Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
100-300mm Or 75-300mm?  
User currently offlineLewis From Greece, joined Jul 1999, 3659 posts, RR: 5
Posted (13 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 3842 times:

I will be buying a new lens the following month and I am between Canon's 75-300 USM IS, 75-300 USM and 100-300 USM? Which one has better performance? I read that the lens featuring Image Stabilizer has soft focusing beyond 200mm and I would like a user to verify this or deny it before i spend 430$ for it.

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAircanon From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 238 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (13 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3771 times:

Lewis

I used to have the Canon EF 75-300 f/4.0-5.6 III. That is the cheapest 75-300 Lens from Canon. It was quite ok and i made nice pictures with it. Some of them though turned out blury so i decided to give it away and then i bought the Canon EF 75-300 f/4.0-5.6 IS USM. Since then i get sharper pictures. Yes on the upper end of the Zoom it does get a little soften but so did the other one. The only thing you have to keep in mind is that using the IS takes about one second before it works. Also the autofocus is a little bit slower with the 75-300 lens. Not slow with my Canon EF 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM. And yes of course... You can switch the image stabilzer off when you do not need it. When using a tripod you should definetly turn the IS off.

IS works best when taking pictures of static objects. It works ok when panning moving objects but you have to practice and find out when it suits best.

Just to give you an idea.. The photo below i made with the EF 75-300 IS lens. I scanned it from a print not a slide.


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Edwin Olinowetz



Oh.. I almost forgot! I decided for the 75-300 and not for the 100-300 so i am more flexibel and do not have to change lenses so often. "L" lenses would be the best but they cost a looooot of money hehe..

Hope i was of some help.

Lot´s of luck with your new lens whatever it will be.

Kind Regards

Edwin (AirCanon)


User currently offlineA380-200 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 3761 times:

Hi Lewis,

I would go for the 100-300 USM.

I recently traded my 75-300 F4-5.6 USM for this lens and it is a whole lot better.

The 75-300mm is what I call a "consumer" lens. I would call the 100-300 USM a serious amateur lens. It has better optics, internal focusing, is quicker, quieter and sharper. Here in England the 75-300 USM (without IS) costs about 170 GBP - I paid 200 GBP for a used 100-300 USM when I traded the 75-300...you get what you pay for at the end of the day.

I now have...

24-85 Canon USM F3.5-4.5 (did have 28-80 USM "consumer" lens)
70-210 Canon USM F3.5-4.5 USM
100-300 Canon F4.5-5.6 USM

All from the same internal focusing range...and all very nice lenses.

You will not be disappointed with the 100-300.

Cheers,
Dean


User currently offlineZoomer From Netherlands, joined Dec 2000, 218 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (13 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 3735 times:

I can't give you any technical info on Cannon. What advice I can give you is: aim for an 75-300 lens. It will save you a lot of lens changes. I used to have a 100-300 and it was a pain in the deriere.

User currently offlineA380-200 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 6 months 1 week 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 3714 times:

Two bodies gets me around that problem  Smile

And...is it not better to change the lens now and then and use good lenses...rather than compromise quality for convenience...surely a false "economy"...

Cheers,
Dean


User currently offlineUSAir_757 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 996 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (13 years 6 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 3719 times:

Get the 28-105 USM and the 100-300 USM...high quality combination, andthe same lens switching as with 28-80 and 75-300.

Regards
Cullen



-Cullen Wassell @ MLI | Pentax K5 + DA18-55WR + Sigma 70-300 DL Macro Super
User currently offlineRindt From Germany, joined May 2000, 930 posts, RR: 13
Reply 6, posted (13 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 3714 times:

I use a 35-70mm and an 80-200mm with one camera body... and I switch lenses all the time. Even though I have two camera bodies, I like being able to shoot about 4.5 fps with my F90x ALL the time... in the very distant future I'll have two F5s, but unless I win the lottery, this won't happen for a while.

Regards,
Rob




What other people think of you is none of your business!
User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (13 years 6 months 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 3724 times:

I've used both lenses. The quality of the 100-300mm lens is definately better than the 75-300mm, but having that lower limit of 100mm was really a pain in the ass. I almost dropped lenses a couple of times because of hurried lens changes.

Out of frustration, I bought Sigma's 28-300mm hyperzoom. I don't have to worry about lens changes anymore, and the lens is even smaller than the 100-300mm Canon lens, but the image quality I find is slightly inferior.

Try the Canon EF 75-300 f/4.0-5.6 IS USM, like Aircanon suggested. The optics should be a little better in that one.

Charles



Charles


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
100-300mm Or 75-300mm? posted Thu Apr 19 2001 14:54:26 by Lewis
Thoughts On 100-300mm SLR Lens posted Fri Mar 25 2005 15:31:33 by A321fly
Pentax 100-300mm Lense, Good? posted Sun May 19 2002 09:00:23 by Serge
Which 100-300mm Lens For EOS30? Help Please. posted Sat Apr 6 2002 19:52:20 by Craigy
Canon EF 100-300mm/4,5-5,6 USM posted Sun Feb 10 2002 16:19:05 by Ndizani
Shutter Speed With A 100-300mm posted Tue Oct 30 2001 16:58:20 by Lugonza_2001
Canon 100-400 Or 300 L Or 400 L? posted Sat May 13 2006 00:37:44 by LHRSIMON
Canon 100-400 Or 70-200 + 2X TC? posted Sun Jul 20 2003 14:59:20 by Mirage
Canon Lens Help: 70-200L F/4 Or 75-300IS? posted Sun Jul 6 2003 13:47:04 by Boieng747-400
Canon L Lens 100-400mm Or Sigma 50-500mm? posted Thu Dec 12 2002 07:05:15 by Tsentsan