Paulianer From Germany, joined Jul 2002, 875 posts, RR: 12 Posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 8321 times:
do you think the new Canon 28-300 L IS lens is any good for aviation photography. Is the quality comparable with the 100-400 L lens...
I almost bought a 100-400 L lens to replace my current 75-300 IS lens, but as I have also the 28-135 IS lens I really like the idea of the 28-300 which mean that I don't have to change lenses anymore (reduce the risk of sensor dust).
Any opinions or experiences with that lens? I know is more expensive than the 100-400.
As always, thanks for your help in advance.
Tobias Rose - Hamburg (HAM/EDDH) & (XFW/EDHI) - Canon EOS D60 - ICQ: 235621277 - MSN: Tobias.Rose@gmx.de
Zander From Sweden, joined Feb 2000, 611 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 8261 times:
I am very interested in that lens too, I am not sure if it's out on the market here in Sweden yet but I really hope so.
It's a great range for aviation photography, especially at airports like
AB) (FRA / FRF / EDDF), Germany">FRA and AMS.
Chris78cpr From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2825 posts, RR: 48
Reply 3, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 8233 times:
The sample i tested was soft and suffered from chromatic aberration. 100-400 is of a much higher quality than this! This lens is pretty much designed for travel photographers who shoot in harsh condition and cant afford to change lenses a lot!
It is nowhere near as sharp as a 100-400/70-200! Very overpriced also! I would only get this if it was priced at Â£500ish.
5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII