Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Badcentred?  
User currently offlineDehowie From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 1056 posts, RR: 34
Posted (9 years 9 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1311 times:

Great photo by David,but any reason why it wasn't bounced and recentred prior to uploading?

View Large View Medium

Photo © DAVID GAIR


From where i sit a quick bit of cropping would have sorted it out and given the number of rejections for this exact reason i am wondering why this one was let slide?
From which an even better photo would have been created.
Darren

[Edited 2004-06-28 15:32:36]


2EOS1DX,EF14.2.8LII,17TS,85/1.2,16-35L,24-70LII,24L,70-200F2.8LII,100-400,300/400/500/800L
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFlyingbronco05 From United States of America, joined May 2002, 3840 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (9 years 9 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1296 times:

Rare/unusual photos have lower quality standards.

FB05



Never Trust Your Fuel Gauge
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 2, posted (9 years 9 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 1294 times:

I think this is one of those situations where the rules say the aircraft must be in the "proper" dead center of the frame should be overlooked. When I look at it, I can almost sense the movement toward me in the direction of the turn, and gives some depth to the image. I'm not sure I would like it as much with the run of the mill centering rule applied.

Well done Mr. Gair


User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2035 posts, RR: 33
Reply 3, posted (9 years 9 months 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 1266 times:

I agree Jeff, the framing gives the aircraft space to 'fly into'.

That being said, this has come up before in similar photographs, which have been equally well composed, but rejected for badcentre.

I suppose the rarity and interest of the subject has worked for photographer, screener, and viewer in this instance.



It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlineKaddyuk From Wallis and Futuna, joined Nov 2001, 4126 posts, RR: 26
Reply 4, posted (9 years 9 months 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 1247 times:

I like that shot Big grin




I really really do  Smile Well done mate



Whoever said "laughter is the best medicine" never had Gonorrhea
User currently offlineDehowie From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 1056 posts, RR: 34
Reply 5, posted (9 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1197 times:

Fair enough about the rare photo high quality etc as it is a rare high quality photo.
However my point was it would take less than 60 sec's to make this photo goodcentre'd.

Darren



2EOS1DX,EF14.2.8LII,17TS,85/1.2,16-35L,24-70LII,24L,70-200F2.8LII,100-400,300/400/500/800L
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 713 posts, RR: 16
Reply 6, posted (9 years 9 months 4 weeks ago) and read 1174 times:

Darren - its only your opinion that centering would improve the pic. Yes, I know A.net likes centered pics, but many of us prefer not to centre. As Jeff has said, in this pic the composition provides depth. There is a visual dynamic to this shot that centering would kill dead.

Sometimes the screeners let us get away with it, sometimes not, but I'd prefer photogs to upload the compositions they're happy with and risk rejection rather than conform to an arbitrary rule.

Cheers,

Colin



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineDehowie From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 1056 posts, RR: 34
Reply 7, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1164 times:

Hi Colin
I agree that many photo's are improved by non centreing and indeed the 1/3 rule for most shots applies in aeroplane photo's as much as anywhere else.
In this case the A340 looks great at the top of frame and i was more referring to the left right rather than the up down which adds considerably to the photo.
As Jeff said it makes it sem to be moving toward you and Dave has seemingly used the 1/3 rule perfectly to add to the photo.
If anything it goes to show that as a rule a photo which uses the 1/3 rule which ALL landscape photographers,nature photags try to use where ever possible should be applied here at A.Net.
A perect example was my SQ photo from yesterday.
If i was allowed to crop it like this A340 pic it would have looked far more dramatic.
With the aircraft a third of the way up rather than in the middle and the great looking sky occupying over half the photo a more "classic style" aviation photo would have resulted.
The 1/3 rule is a basic rule of photo composition taught to ALL photographers in training yet is considered "badcentrered" at Airliners.
I am wondring why it is so????
Thanks
Darren

[Edited 2004-06-29 03:38:09]


2EOS1DX,EF14.2.8LII,17TS,85/1.2,16-35L,24-70LII,24L,70-200F2.8LII,100-400,300/400/500/800L
User currently offlineDehowie From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 1056 posts, RR: 34
Reply 8, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1154 times:

WHere did David's photo go.
I seems to have been removed from both the top 24/48 and all its links are dead?
Something funny going on??

Darren



2EOS1DX,EF14.2.8LII,17TS,85/1.2,16-35L,24-70LII,24L,70-200F2.8LII,100-400,300/400/500/800L
User currently offlinePlaneboy From India, joined May 2005, 199 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1151 times:

Dehowie (Darren) -

Good topic and since you brought it up I viewed your photos. You've been putting some real nice photos up on this site. This one below - fantastic - heat haze in background - very impressionist...


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Darren Howie




But since you have mentioned quote "Badcentred?", I think we should talk about this photo below...


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Darren Howie



Indeed, a wonderful photo, I have viewed many of similar composition. But I have to say - looks a bit odd to me - unbalanced or as you have said above "Badcentred". I am fascinated with airplanes and for this reason I upload many photos to this site. But I am very limited. My eyes are bad and my camera is very generic. If I could capture an image like the one above, I would show more space beyond the nose of the aircraft. As is, this photo looks bad centered - a bit off balance...

But what do I know?

Keep having fun Darren - your images are great !!




User currently offlineDehowie From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 1056 posts, RR: 34
Reply 10, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1144 times:

G'day
I personally think you are correct but it is not what the screeners like.
I also think my BA 744 shot is unbalanced(bit like myself sometimes!!) but in shots which include winglets etc the screeners here seem to like the same distance between the extremities of the aircraft.
In this case the winglet and nose.
My personal preference is as you say for balance and for more space on the front so the picture is weighted correctly.
I agree 100%.
Thanks for the kind comments to.
All the best
Darren



2EOS1DX,EF14.2.8LII,17TS,85/1.2,16-35L,24-70LII,24L,70-200F2.8LII,100-400,300/400/500/800L
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9601 posts, RR: 69
Reply 11, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1138 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

uploading a stolen shot is huge, what an asshole

User currently offlineDehowie From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 1056 posts, RR: 34
Reply 12, posted (9 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 1132 times:

Your kidding???
Unbelievable.
Darren



2EOS1DX,EF14.2.8LII,17TS,85/1.2,16-35L,24-70LII,24L,70-200F2.8LII,100-400,300/400/500/800L
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Badcentred - Help Please posted Tue Jul 12 2005 11:53:13 by Malandan
Badcentred? posted Mon Jun 28 2004 15:30:56 by Dehowie