Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A Road Crossing For This Jumbo, How Impressive!  
User currently offlineJkw777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3859 times:

Hi there,

On many occasions when I go to LHR to shoot we see a mixture of BA/SAA 744's 777's etc being moved across the famous perimeter road! I have taken pics everytime but never been successful. Until today when I got my first LHR road crossing uploaded Big grin


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Justin Wood



Wahoo! Makes me kinda happy  Smile

Enjoy you guys!

Best Regards,

Justin  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

27 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 35
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3821 times:

I reckon its been done before.

User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9664 posts, RR: 68
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3821 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

plugging your own photos is weak. Its cool if you are telling a story, or making a point, but trolling for hits is the sauce  Insane

User currently offlineSpencer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 1635 posts, RR: 17
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3787 times:

A self plug maybe. But to those of us who are Heathrow regulars, this is something that can be seen several times a day; those who haven't done the 'Row might just want to see this spectacle? Personally, I haven't shot anything there for a while, but it's a prime spot for detail shots, if that's your thing. It also shows just how close you can still get to the aircraft at LHR, where most of the rest of the airport is either strictly off limits or extremely inaccessible.... It's a decent enough shot too, just perhaps not everyone's cup of tea.
Spencer.



EOS1D4, 7D, 30D, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS USM, 70-200/2.8 L IS2 USM, 17-40 f4 L USM, 24-105 f4 L IS USM, 85 f1.8 USM
User currently offlineTS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3775 times:

All these guys have fantastic shots as well & didn't start threads about it.

View Large View Medium

Photo © Lee Mathews
View Large View Medium

Photo © Gary Watt - AirTeamImages



View Large View Medium

Photo © Gary Watt - AirTeamImages
View Large View Medium

Photo © Christian Waser - Aviapix Zurich/Worldwide



View Large View Medium

Photo © Kevin Minter
View Large View Medium

Photo © Johannes klinghardt



View Large View Medium

Photo © Gregory Bajor
View Large View Medium

Photo © Marlo Plate - IBERIAN SPOTTERS



View Large View Medium

Photo © Michiel Haspeslagh
View Large View Medium

Photo © Stuart Lawson



View Large View Medium

Photo © Ben Pritchard
View Large View Medium

Photo © Christian Galliker



View Large View Medium

Photo © Paul Langfermann - The Art of Flying Photos
View Large View Medium

Photo © Simon Nicholls



View Large View Medium

Photo © Ian Woodcock
View Large View Medium

Photo © Simon Nicholls



[Edited 2004-07-08 22:24:13]

User currently offlineGranite From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5577 posts, RR: 63
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3725 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi all

Justin, if I knew you were going to plug, I would have rejected earlier this morning  Acting devilish

I'll need to re-scan some of my shots above, including my cousin's. Anyone seen him going around LHR lately?

Cheers

Gary


User currently offlineQantas744 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 246 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3717 times:

Rumour has it that spot is disappearing pretty soon...catch 'em while you can. Smile/happy/getting dizzy




Matt



you can't buy time but you can sell your soul and the closest thing to heaven is to rock'n'roll
User currently offlineFSPilot747 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 3599 posts, RR: 12
Reply 7, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3607 times:

Wow, you guys are a harsh bunch.

Shot's great, and I wouldn't have seen it without this thread!




FSP


User currently offlineINNflight From Switzerland, joined Apr 2004, 3767 posts, RR: 60
Reply 8, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 3586 times:

I like the shot Justin, but plugging it here.... hehe... now i know why it's number one of the 24/48 so far  Laugh out loud Good plug  Insane

regards, Florian



Jet Visuals
User currently offlineHisham From Lebanon, joined Aug 1999, 701 posts, RR: 11
Reply 9, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3585 times:

Everybody's tempted to plug from time to time. Johan should count cheap hits separately. Big grin

BTW, check out the stain on the captain's shirt in this photo!!!!!!!

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Hisham Atallah



Hisham.


User currently offlineRotate From Switzerland, joined Feb 2003, 1491 posts, RR: 16
Reply 10, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3563 times:

I ve seen so many pics of a/c crossing the perimeter road, I even dont get it why it still gets accepted .... , i had them rejected several times last year, even with a Concorde ...
I even more dont get it, how this pic got nr 1 on 24 - 48 hrs sofar ...
And I am also so sick of that plugin altitide of some people here in the forum ....
hits/views/average ...... , I dont give a shit .... , why not get rid of it ?

Robin



ABC
User currently offlineJkw777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 3545 times:

I'd like to point out that this was not an attempt to gain hits, but to share this picture with everyone who might appreciate it more than some of you.

This is also the first picture of a South African B744 crossing that road in the database at LHR. So in a way it hasn't been done before.

Why is it you all blow up at this? I have done nothing wrong. Jesus.

Bye,

Justin  Sad


User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2037 posts, RR: 32
Reply 12, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3493 times:

Lighten up guys. It's just a bit of harmless sharing, and ultimately, it is why we're all here, whether you want to admit it or not.


Cheers,


James






It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlineJoge From Finland, joined Feb 2000, 1444 posts, RR: 39
Reply 13, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 3447 times:

I even more dont get it, how this pic got nr 1 on 24 - 48 hrs sofar ...

Because it's...


  • in LHR

  • a B747

  • plugged to this discussion  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

  • badcommonangle  Nuts



And I am also so sick of that plugin altitide of some people here in the forum ....
hits/views/average ...... , I dont give a shit .... , why not get rid of it ?


LOL, agree with you, Robin! Not always, but quite often the nicer pictures (read: in my opinion) get less views than the popular ones. For instance, I like Hisham's brilliant composition of the B737 much better than the picture of another bloody B747 in LHR. Anyway, is that a nose close-up?

Don't misunderstand me, didn't mean to be offensive  Sad

-Joge



Bula!
User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2037 posts, RR: 32
Reply 14, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3441 times:

747's at LHR are popular because that is what the viewing public wants. Not a damn thing you can do about it. There are many, many good shots of other aircraft here (Gary Watt's Choppers, Derek Pedley & Colin Work's GA pictures) and they arguably do not get the attention they deserve.

As I remarked to Justin in person the other day, this is very much an airliner site. Other aircraft simply don't hit that well.

I happen to like the picture (I was there on the day, and have a similar image) and I don't have the slightest problem with people plugging. If someone wants to start a thread showing 100 thumbnails, more power to him. I don't have to read it, and I don't have to click on them.

I'll also keep shitty comments to myself.



It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlineGranite From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5577 posts, RR: 63
Reply 15, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3439 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi all

What a heap of shit this thread has turned out to be.

Picture was screened.
Pictures was accepted.
People viewed it.
people liked it.
It got No.1 on the 24-48 section.
End of story.

I suppose I will get a bollocking for direct adding in the first place.

Now if Justin would add the tail close up, I will add that one too.

Cheers

Gary


User currently offlineJoge From Finland, joined Feb 2000, 1444 posts, RR: 39
Reply 16, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3437 times:

And what we learn from here...

Don't try to argue with the screeners!  Innocent

-Joge



Bula!
User currently offlineLGW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 3418 times:

Gary,

As I see it it's not the image this discussion is really debating it's the fact that a whole new post was made by the photographer just to show it off.

I saw the image when I did a UK-England search as will many of other people so I think a lot of people don't like a post made about it.

Ben Pritchard


User currently offlineGranite From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5577 posts, RR: 63
Reply 18, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3396 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Ben

I am fully aware of that but the thread was taking a differnet route.

Cheers

Gary


User currently offlineWillo From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 1352 posts, RR: 12
Reply 19, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3390 times:

I agree with Ben about the motive of this thread. I think in this instance the screener should not have made comment (just my view).

[Edited 2004-07-09 13:58:23]

[Edited 2004-07-09 13:59:08]

User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 20, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3386 times:

Excuse me, but exactly how could the impartiality of the screener be questioned? Please show me.

W



Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineEGBB From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3362 times:

I don't agree with all the 'self plugs' we get every day whether it be from the photographer or his mates but Justin seems to have been singled out as the bad guy and the only culprit for some inexplicable reason which I don't understand and which I feel is wrong!

In my opinion he is nowhere near as bad as many who rubbish this forum with constant plugs of either their own work or that of close buddies at EVERY possible opportunity

Derek Pedley





User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4163 posts, RR: 54
Reply 22, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3343 times:

The more you plug or let someone plug for you the more you get singled out. IMHO this plugging sh/( should stop and this forum should go back to its roots. Discussing about photography issues. Oh and even screeners are allowed to make comments from time to time.  Nuts  Nuts


-
User currently offlineLGW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3325 times:

Hi all,

Couldnt agree more with Derek and Peter well said guys

Ben Pritchard


User currently offlineJoge From Finland, joined Feb 2000, 1444 posts, RR: 39
Reply 24, posted (10 years 5 months 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 3325 times:

Derek, Peter...

Personally I don't see nothing wrong with plugging pictures to the discussions, but of course it should make some sense. For getting more hits, I think the plugging should be stopped. Also threats like "post your most popular pics here"... I dunno, that goes to the same category with the posts in the civil aviation, e.g. "a/c type you have flown most".

But for asking opinions or showing an example when somebody is asking for spotting help on an airport, photo plugs are ok.

Why was the plug-thing started in first place? Or why was "views" thing implemented with the pictures? Why why why...  Sleepy

-Joge



Bula!
25 Post contains images Skymonster : Shame certain photographers feel it necessary to plug their own work. I suspect its like guys with little appendages sometimes feel the need to shout
26 Post contains links and images EGBB : Fully agree with you Peter http://www.airliners.net/discussions/aviation_photography/read.main/135121/6/ http://www.airliners.net/discussions/aviation
27 Sulman : Peter, Is it really that big an issue? Does it really bother people that much? People of just about any persuasion and authority quite frequently lowe
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Do I Charge For This And How Much? posted Sat Mar 20 2004 03:36:22 by CFIcraigAPA
How Much To Ask For This Photo Use? posted Wed Aug 10 2005 19:56:10 by AGD
How Much Should I Charge For This? posted Sat Jan 24 2004 03:23:20 by Lyzzard
How Much For This Photo? posted Mon Feb 3 2003 04:43:50 by JayDavis
I Need The Info For This A/c (Piper Navajo) posted Mon Sep 25 2006 21:28:38 by Lanas
Some Opinions Wanted For This Photo posted Sat Sep 23 2006 18:02:17 by AIRBUSRIDER
What Got Me On Motive For This Shot? posted Mon Sep 18 2006 19:53:44 by JohnJ
Any Hope For This Image? posted Mon Aug 7 2006 17:09:37 by TEBguy
Would A.net Go For This Motive? posted Sun Jul 16 2006 14:03:08 by Sulman
Any Chance For This One? posted Sun Apr 23 2006 23:24:30 by Christeljs