Now first of all I know what you are thinking: "There is visable compression, and the tail is slightly cut off by the copyright bar." I can assure you that those are both faults of the site which I uploaded to. Unlike a.net, the copyright bar goes over part of the image, instead of adding onto the bottom. Also, the site compresses it a little too much for my monitor.
Anyway, would this be acceptable?
Also, Alex Kroychik, if you are reading this, could you post the Reg# for me? It came in around 5:30.
JeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3267 posts, RR: 50
Reply 7, posted (11 years 7 months 2 days ago) and read 2561 times:
I hate laptops.... I can't tell for sure, but it looks like Hisham is right. It is under-exposed. That is a tough angle to shoot by any means, but this is Airliners.net, not BlueSky.net.... What you can do is make a duplicate layer, mask off the aircraft, then adjust your levels, and then do a shadow/highlight recovery and adjust to bring out a little more exposure to the underside. Then flatten, sharpen, etc., etc., etc.,....... If you do it with a layer/mask, you'll retain the nice blue sky...!
Shooting the entire Delta fleet I think here in Salt Lake....