Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
That Old Chestnut: Sharpening  
User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2041 posts, RR: 28
Posted (11 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3407 times:

I've been exploring photoshop some more and I've got some questions about sharpening technique. I typically use 30/0.3/0 for percentage amount/pixel radius/threshold and it's served me well (thanks Justin!), however I'm still not sure it's ideal in some cases.

My interest was prompted when I read this informative article here:


I found it helpful as, aside from having a very basic knowledge of what USM does, I didn't have a clue what the settings really meant. Having said that, I looked at my own settings, and dug up an old thread here, and found most people prefer very low figures, but in particular a threshold value of '0'. Essentially, this means that Photoshop will apply the sharpening algorithm to all pixels where a difference is detected after creating the mask; no matter how small that difference is.

That was enlightening for me, as I had noticed on some of my images a very fine - but noticeable - saw-tooth effect on low contrast edges, such as white fuselages against the sky, or wing leading-edges against any background. I'm not talking about the USM stegosaurus you get after oversharpening, but something more subtle. Increasing the threshold did seem to help with this quite a bit.

Any techniques people want to share? Do you just avoid USM 'problem' areas and process parts of the image individually? People do get some amazing results and I thought it would be useful to exchange some tips.

It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 813 posts, RR: 12
Reply 1, posted (11 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3378 times:

This is such a difficult area ... to get good results is pretty straight forward, but to get optimum results, well that's another matter! Moreover, as the best results are also dependent on camera type (and in-camera settings), file processing method (in the case of RAW) and required output size, the ideal formula is going to be pretty specific to any individual photographer and picture.

For this reason, 3rd party tools such as FocalBlade are very useful since they a) analyse the actual image being sharpened to determine an optimum algorthm and b) provide simple slider controls to fine tune things like haloing (which would require very time consuming masking and channel work in PS).

I have been through the process of writing reasonably complex actions for optimum sharpening, but, apart from the intellectual interest, this is really a waste of time. I don't worry about it too much anymore.

For everyday work, I'll use a standard USM formula - for my 1Dii, its something like 300-400/0.3/0 for A.net size images; 300-400/0.6/3 for A4 size prints (note that unlike the 10D/D60/300D which always apply some sharpening, even with sharpening set to 0, the 1Dii applies none).

For very critical work, I'll use Focalblade.

Subject matter makes a difference as well - in general, with aviation pics, we just want the image "sharp". However, with portraits, such an approach can be unflattering - we want sharp eyes, but smooth skin, so here selective sharpening becomes necessary, though once again, products like Focalblade make this much easier.



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineChrisH From Sweden, joined Jul 2004, 1136 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (11 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3368 times:

On a 1024x image I usually start with 80%/0.3/3, and then adjust percentage to what looks good. I do this in LAB-mode in lightness channel. If jaggies appear, Either sharpen the image in a new layer, then use erase tool to "paint away" the jaggies, using low flow (press 3 on keypad for 30% flow, 4 for 40% etc.). Or you can use the historybrush to accomplish the same thing really. Also I use quickmask to select the aircraft or details I want sharpened, leaving skies and background untouched.

what seems to be the officer, problem?
User currently offlineKaddyuk From Wallis and Futuna, joined Nov 2001, 4126 posts, RR: 23
Reply 3, posted (11 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3317 times:

USM Is the best tool in photoshop [IMO].

I am usually using the following 200-400% / 0.3-0.4 / 3 or 4

This can bring some nice results without enhancing grain too much  Smile

Whoever said "laughter is the best medicine" never had Gonorrhea
User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3267 posts, RR: 50
Reply 4, posted (11 years 10 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3292 times:

I use Focal Blade almost exclusively for my print sales. The latest upgrade seems to be the best yet. USM is o.k. for simple things like viewing online, but the results are just that. Nothing special.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Old Pictures That Have Historical Significance posted Wed Jun 30 2004 05:20:40 by Jetjock22
Look At This Old Picture That I Found posted Sun Dec 15 2002 05:50:32 by Sushka
Help With Sharpening posted Fri Dec 1 2006 00:31:36 by LOCsta
Colorizing Old Black And Whites posted Thu Nov 30 2006 20:35:11 by SlamClick
Very Old Pictures posted Sat Nov 18 2006 02:31:47 by Flugnord
Old Dan-Air London Photo's - A/C ID Help Please? posted Fri Nov 3 2006 12:02:17 by Dazbo5
St Marten Never Gets Old! posted Fri Oct 20 2006 17:10:31 by NIKV69
That Terrible Patch Of Dayglow posted Sun Sep 17 2006 00:57:30 by Ptrjong
Motive And Sharpening Question posted Fri Sep 15 2006 06:13:29 by MarkJBeckwith
My Sharpening Am I Close? posted Mon Sep 11 2006 07:02:34 by JumboJim747