Thomasphoto60 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3786 posts, RR: 24 Reply 1, posted (12 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1142 times:
Wow! this is a tough call.... One could argue that since Cable TV HongKong submitted the image and it was they who made the image that it does not break the rules. I suppose it is up to the viewer and Joahn to decide. Personally I do not care for it.
Tappan From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 1538 posts, RR: 44 Reply 2, posted (12 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1089 times:
We all (aviation buffs) are glued to the news when something as horrible as this happens to the aviation community that we all are passionate about. It happens. I do not feel as if the photo is exploiting. It was gathered as a news organization should gather..I am sure the image is painful for families and airline employees, but I think this type of photo on airliners.net is an important one (historically speaking) for those here who use a.net to further their info regarding these things.School reports, thesis etc.
Thom@s From Norway, joined Oct 2000, 11951 posts, RR: 50 Reply 3, posted (12 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1074 times:
Images that are accident or inncident related can be accepted allthough they may be of bad quality or display the date in the corner or simmilar. I'm pretty sure it says something like that in the FAQs.
"If guns don't kill people, people kill people - does that mean toasters don't toast toast, toast toast toast?"
Cathay111 From Australia, joined Oct 2006, 55 posts, RR: 15 Reply 5, posted (12 years 7 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 1050 times:
I agree with Mark, it should stay as it does depict an incident that will be thought of for years to come not only by the families of the victims, but aviation enthusiasts as well. Also this was one of the first shots of the CI MD-11 crash as well and it does provide the viewer with an abundance of information on which he/she can use to imagine just how this incident occured.
After all, the image was submitted by the company that owns the copyright to this "screenshot".
I remember when it was uploaded, I for one viewed the full size image and appreciated the information that the shot contained given that I took photos of this aircraft 30hrs prior to the crash (see below).
Cathay111 From Australia, joined Oct 2006, 55 posts, RR: 15 Reply 8, posted (12 years 7 months 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 1015 times:
Glenn, living in a glasshouse and throwing stones..... interesting.
From memory I believe that aircraft crashed, and these being the last shots this aircraft prior to the crash of it were very important to both myself, and the people that view this site.
Interesting that none of these aircraft have crashed.
These examples are just some of many that are here @ a.net and you may note that of these 4 photos 2 contain wrong information (Qantas Air Calin?, F-DMPX??? Doesn't exist). These shots were all taken on the same day.
Glenn From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0 Reply 12, posted (12 years 7 months 4 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 988 times:
Luis, As guilty as I am, I was only pointing out to an aquantaince who has emailed me in the past with so called dupes, that he too is as guilty as I. Seems to have been a mute point
In all honesty, I think it is not the number of photos one has here, it is the quality of them. Looking back on them they are extremely crappy scans
But you are right, some of these should be removed to conform with the moving goal posts.