Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Rare Photo Rejected  
User currently offlineLevg79 From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 995 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2165 times:

Hello everyone!

Have you ever noticed how this database lacks photos of LY's cabin shots? As a matter of fact, the first one was only added a couple of days ago. Well, I uploaded my shot of LY's 777 cabin and guess what, it got rejected. What can I do to improve the quality of my shot? Please help.

Leo.

http://airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=elal.jpg


A mile of runway takes you to the world. A mile of highway takes you a mile.
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11708 posts, RR: 60
Reply 1, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2110 times:

While it may be a rare photo, it is not very crisp and the background seems slightly blurred to me. There is also some glare from the headrest in front which I presume comes from the flash of your camera. Have a play around with it in a photo editing program and you might have more luck.

Dan  Smile



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineEGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 35
Reply 2, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2086 times:

Too dark, not level, too soft..

User currently offlineJeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2051 times:

Your right, there definitely isn't man images like that, if any, in the database..
Compare yours to some that have made it in, and you will see what you "need".


User currently offlineN317AS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2015 times:

Too dark and soft and the woman in the middle is recognizeable. I think no matter how much it is lightened and sharpened, you'll still get a bad people.

Bill


User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 2000 times:

Flash killed it.



The message you were about to post is too short and probably not of any higher value to the topic at hand. You should think long and hard before posting a message in this forum and make it detailed and a valuable addition to the topic discussed.

Avoid posting "Me Too" messages. These are messages that are posted by people who agree to a point being discussed and post a one liner, "me too!", "Good post Jim!", "I disagree" or similar message. This takes up time as readers must sort through these messages which have no real value to the group at large. Any message containing nothing more than a line or two of text is probably not worth posting.

If you have an opinion on a topic, you should in detail express why you have the opinion and what made you come to that conclusion.

Your post should be relevant to the topic discussed.







Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Photo Rejected. Help? posted Wed Apr 19 2006 21:01:05 by Christeljs
Why Was This Photo Rejected? posted Mon Apr 3 2006 19:07:00 by Bravo45
'Dark' Photo Rejected For Being 'dark'? posted Mon Mar 13 2006 22:22:05 by Mattbna
Photo Rejected For . . . "error" posted Wed Feb 22 2006 10:50:29 by AndrewUber
Photo Rejected, Screener Tio Help Needed posted Wed Feb 8 2006 08:26:57 by A388
Photo Rejected Because Of.. posted Fri Aug 5 2005 17:02:48 by TFSPhoto
How To Improve This Very Rare Photo? posted Sat Sep 11 2004 22:31:48 by Blackhawk144
Photo Rejected For Being A "Nice Shot"! posted Sat Sep 11 2004 04:54:21 by Jakbar
An-124 Cockpit Photo Rejected posted Sun Jul 4 2004 21:09:57 by Numloxx
RE: Why Was This Photo Rejected posted Thu May 27 2004 23:45:50 by CactusHP