Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
B767-200 Hardest Plane To Get The Rego Right  
User currently offlineN178UA From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1680 posts, RR: 65
Posted (10 years 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4602 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I found B767-200 is one of the hardest plane to get the rego on your side shot. YOu have to do it from an (rear) angle, then it is not 100% side on, I am talking about those 762 have rego got covered by the relatively large wing span such as UA, QF etc (not like AA762s)

Is any other planes a pain in the butt like the lovely 762s?

Subject intend to only slide side on shooters.
Sam

20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTimdegroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4552 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

KLM 744 new c/s, terrible to shoot at 50mm Smile

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineN178UA From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1680 posts, RR: 65
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4536 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

wow that was a quickie  Smile

Beside that, I just got all my AMS k64 back after 3 weeks, oooooooo....lot of horizontal stabilizer got clipped off, seems to be Kodak mounting cover rather a large area than my Fuji mount. I open the cardboard mount, the hori. stab. is there!! A pain in the butt to scan those full frame slides too. I found looking at the new slides returned from kodak much more joy than shooting digital  Big grin

Sorry Jan  Wink/being sarcastic

Sam


User currently offlineJan Mogren From Sweden, joined Dec 2000, 2043 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4537 times:

My beloved SP's are the same... sometimes you have to settle for a slight rear shot  Angry

/JM



AeroPresentation - Airline DVD's filmed in High Definition
User currently offlineN178UA From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1680 posts, RR: 65
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4533 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

On a full frame slide, especially if it is slightly not level, you don't have much room to adjust without cropping off things....

I just found out I have a great shot of the Sudan/Flyair Turkey A300 (with JAS hybrid and the evil eye on the tail), and it was so tightly done and I have no room to adjust.  Sad

I have to learn shoot less full frame soon

The one from LAX turned out real well, real blue sky! especially that N163AT Joe  Big thumbs up
Sam

[Edited 2004-08-16 16:36:07]

User currently offlineJan Mogren From Sweden, joined Dec 2000, 2043 posts, RR: 51
Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4534 times:

Sam,
you clipped them again????? Never mind the trading then..  Wink/being sarcastic
/JM



AeroPresentation - Airline DVD's filmed in High Definition
User currently offlineTimdegroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4517 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Sam, yes Fuji fullframe is easy. Kodak fullframe, whole other story Big grin

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlineN178UA From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1680 posts, RR: 65
Reply 7, posted (10 years 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 4508 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

It just a disease in my blood and vein everytime I see a hot plane I try to squeeze it into the frame as much as I can !!! Full Frame Action shot  Big grin

Sam


User currently offlineJderden777 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 1755 posts, RR: 29
Reply 8, posted (10 years 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 4373 times:

roush air racing 727-100 (N502MG, and 503MG for that matter) have the reg right behind the trailing edge of the wing root....had to shoot it from slightly rear...this is best i could do kneeling down...standing up the wing blocked the reg

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jonathan Derden - SPOT THIS!



i agree with you tim, those KLM 744s in the new paint are a pain!  Big grin

jd



"my soul is in the sky" - shakespeare
User currently offlineCathay112 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (10 years 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 4296 times:

One doesn't have to be a "slide side shooter" to know about this problem!

762's and 74L's are the most troublesome when it comes to getting a good side on shot with the registration visible!

I know Frank always had trouble shooting the 762's for this exact reason!

Cheers,
Craig
(Non slide shooting sometimes side on shooting photographer).



User currently offlineN178UA From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1680 posts, RR: 65
Reply 10, posted (10 years 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4288 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Sorry Craig, slide shooting and digicam shooting ain't exact the same. Hence I try to direct this to only slide people and those people understand this better than anyone else (with no offense to digicam guys). On slide shooting, espcially, the rego showing clearly in side on position is highly sought after, for collection, trading, selling and many reasons. On digital personally I don't find there's a lot of principles around, I will go for slides for close side on and digital for tele side on, actions, artistic etc.

Sam


User currently offlineBronko From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 810 posts, RR: 11
Reply 11, posted (10 years 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4282 times:

I think (and correct me if I am wrong) Craig's point was that if the reg is hidden behind a wing or whatever, it doesn't matter if you are shooting film or with a digital. It is still hidden regardless.

Slide shooters don't have a monopoly on straight on side shots. Your's may be worth more or sell, but you get my point.  Smile



Jet City Aviation Photography
User currently offlineN178UA From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1680 posts, RR: 65
Reply 12, posted (10 years 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 4275 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi Bronko, your point is well taken by me.

But,
I direct this thread to the interest of slide shooting people, primary reason is they understand what I am saying the BEST and they know in side on position which A/C is hard to get it right. Believe me, I genuinely want to direct this message to slide shooters, on digital, I ain't care too much on the rego thing than slides does, but get the rego in is always better.

But again, Craig got his right to express his feelings on this public forum.
Sam


User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4163 posts, RR: 54
Reply 13, posted (10 years 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 4272 times:

I seem to agree with Mr. Murray very seldom but in this case

One doesn't have to be a "slide side shooter" to know about this problem!

i do



-
User currently offlineN178UA From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1680 posts, RR: 65
Reply 14, posted (10 years 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 4269 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

May be I forgot my point, I direct this thread to the interest of slide shooters, because that's where my interest is. But I didn't mean ALL digital guys didn't know the problem.


Sam


User currently offlineCathay112 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (10 years 1 week 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 4215 times:

I seem to remember a time when I shot only prints and slides and getting a visible rego in a side on shot was always important to me and it still is when I do a similar shoot using a digital camera.

Medium isn't what defines a registration being visible or not..... I'm glad this point is understood from my original comment. Slide, print, digital getting that rego in on the abovementioned aircraft can be a deadset pain in the arse!

Explain how a side on shot is different slide vs print/digital anyway? The talent to get it exactly right to one individuals own personal standards is exactly the same is it not when using SLR/DSLR? Therefore I think the medium in use to be irrelevant in this question.

Strikes me as a little self indulged to think that only a slide shooter/collector has any idea about problems unique to photographing a certain aircraft.

Glad to see that from time to time Peter we can agree, let's not make it a habit mate  Smile/happy/getting dizzy


User currently offlineN178UA From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1680 posts, RR: 65
Reply 16, posted (10 years 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 4195 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

You're right Craig  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Medium isn't what defines a registration being visible or not

But I intend to ask my question to the slide shooters, mainly because almost every single slide shooter care about the Rego being visibile in the shot. Some digital guys just won't as I know it myself! I thought the slide guys would care much more on the rego thing than the digital guys. Having said that, I didn't mean ONLY slide people are aware of the problem.  Smile

Sam


User currently offlineBenyhone From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 206 posts, RR: 3
Reply 17, posted (10 years 1 week 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 4157 times:

L-1011s were notorious for this. You have a perfect example yourself, Sam...


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sam Chui



I don't mind standing slightly behind the wingline to ensure the registration is visible. I hate glare on the fuselage even more than a non-visible reg, and I will adjust my position to "hide" the glare behind a wing, or in a door, for a better photograph.

Terry/PHX



Cactus Wings Photography, Phoenix
User currently offlineFUAirliner From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 538 posts, RR: 3
Reply 18, posted (10 years 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 4145 times:

Sometimes you have to choose whether you accept the glare on the fuselage or a covered registration - I even had to accept both on this one (you don't have the opportunity to shoot this beauty too often):


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank Unterspann



At least you don't need the registration to identify the plane!  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Other planes that are difficult are Alitalia's and Scandinavian's MD-80, Iran Air's Boeing 747SP which has to shot from far behind to make the registration visible and Lufthansa's newly painted Canadair RJs.


Frank



Frank Unterspann - Hamburg, Germany
User currently offlineN178UA From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1680 posts, RR: 65
Reply 19, posted (10 years 1 week 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 4100 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Terry

Yes, haven't photograph L1011 for ages and forgot about their existance!!!!

That Orient Thai one was a pain, not just the plane position, also the security guard won't let me stand any further, that was about 30-35mm if correct...wish I can do better then.

Frank, thanks for pointing out, this is very interesting,

Also Almost All American Airlines plane are a pain to get the rego, coz they're all in dark blue and looks very dark.
Sam


User currently offlineA340Spotter From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1980 posts, RR: 23
Reply 20, posted (10 years 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 4008 times:

Sam, Terry,

I seem to remember America West 757s, notably Teamwork cls, that were hard to get the reg's visible, same goes with TransMeridian 727s currently and certain 777s where you'd have to be just aft of center.

I think that sometimes, when shooting slides side on/gear split, etc., the reg. can be blocked partially but only when the color scheme is a one off, like Teamwork was, the Arizona Cardinals 757 or a Disney 747. If it's a common airliner, like a Continental MD-80, where the reg. is down low, then you'd have to take it slightly forward or aft...I prefer forward of course!

Cheers
Jeffrey



"Irregardless, it's a Cat III airplane, we don't need an alternate!"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Hardest Airline To Get Right posted Mon Nov 10 2003 07:26:55 by Paulinbna
Where In The UK To Get The Best Camera Deals? posted Sun Aug 27 2006 15:21:34 by AndyHunt
Can't Seem To Get Things Looking Right! posted Wed Aug 24 2005 01:47:12 by DC10Tim
How To Center The Plane? posted Fri May 12 2006 12:04:35 by Dcrusafon
OK Guys You Have To Get This UPS Plane! posted Tue Mar 25 2003 20:40:30 by Alaskaairlines
Where To Get CDs Made In The UK? posted Sun Jul 21 2002 23:55:55 by Hkg_clk
Best Place To Get Prints Done On The Net? posted Sun Jul 21 2002 10:11:09 by Alaskaairlines
How To Get A Monitor With The Correct Settings? posted Sun Dec 23 2001 07:34:59 by Ghost77
Time To Get Your Pics On The Site posted Sun Apr 29 2001 16:55:39 by Marka
Criteria To Get In The Headline On Frontpage posted Wed Apr 18 2001 21:03:41 by PUnmuth@VIE