Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Baddouble?  
User currently offlineChristhurtell From Australia, joined Apr 2004, 49 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1337 times:

Im a little confused here. Surely this would constitute baddboule? No offence to Darren as he has taken some amazing shots, but this is one of the things that contributes to the queue being big


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Darren Howie



and


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Darren Howie



These two shots are obviously taken in sequence, if they are not I am more than happy to eat my words

So if i was to upload two shots of the same plane in sequence and they are of high quality will the be accepted? There is nothing special about this particular aircraft that i can see

Still good shots though

Chris

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCancidas From Poland, joined Jul 2003, 4112 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1316 times:

they're not the same shot. plain and simple.


"...cannot the kingdom of salvation take me home."
User currently offlineJderden777 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 1757 posts, RR: 28
Reply 2, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1306 times:

both great shots....these both are a lot better than a lot of the stuff that gets uploaded here...plus the vertical one is very unique, not a very common angle for a.net to say the least

so what's the problem?

jd



"my soul is in the sky" - shakespeare
User currently offlineMia777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2002, 1165 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1303 times:

The baddouble rule is a bit ambiguous. I think this is a baddouble because they were shot seconds apart and the only real difference in focal length. If he shot the plane from behind departing, it probably would not be bad double. Art Brett's MIA sequences cleared that up...


MIA777
User currently offlineN178UA From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1708 posts, RR: 65
Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1303 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

But I think Darren took the vertical shot horizontally  Big grin

Great stuff, having met Darren that day gave me lot of inspirations

Sam


User currently offlineChristhurtell From Australia, joined Apr 2004, 49 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1298 times:

im not too fussed about "how" shot was taken Sam. Its the fact they are almost in sequence, i mean, thats gotta be within say what, 5 seconds apart from each other off rwy25? I think Mia777 put across what i was trying to say a bit better

Chris


User currently offlineN178UA From United Arab Emirates, joined Jan 2001, 1708 posts, RR: 65
Reply 6, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1287 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Oh back to the topic, ummmm no baddouble was detected by me. No rules say you can't upload 2 pic taken within 5 seconds. Both shots were compeltely different, one horizontal and one vertical, one showing all wings and one shot only the body, great composition!  Smile

Sam


User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4163 posts, RR: 54
Reply 7, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1280 times:

1.) Its in the database, so stop whining about. Which is against the forum rules by the way.
2.) Thos shots are for shure NOT the ones contributing to the big Q!



-
User currently offlineChristhurtell From Australia, joined Apr 2004, 49 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1272 times:

great. so asking a question now has turned into whining

wonderfull. is it any wonder i dont bother frequenting these forums too often with responses like that


User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4163 posts, RR: 54
Reply 9, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1261 times:

but this is one of the things that contributes to the queue being big

Asking a question????



-
User currently offlineCancidas From Poland, joined Jul 2003, 4112 posts, RR: 11
Reply 10, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1252 times:

that first one reminds me of this shot:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mateusz Celmer



 Smile sorry for the shameless plug  Smile



"...cannot the kingdom of salvation take me home."
User currently offlineManzoori From UK - England, joined Sep 2002, 1516 posts, RR: 33
Reply 11, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1245 times:

Chris,

The baddouble rule I believe applies when (for example) one snaps a dozen shots of the same aircraft in a sequence, or in the case described above if the photographer has shot it at rotation and then again at rotation + 1 second, +2 seconds, +3 seconds etc.

In this instance Darren may well have done that and many more besides but he has elected to submit the rotation shot (short-ish focal length, full width of the wings, landscape format) and a close-up of the nose gear retracting (longer focal length, portrait crop, concentrating on the nose and fuz only) resulting in two quite different images. So, IMHO this doesn't warrant a Baddouble rejection. Then again I'm not a screener so what do I know!  Wink/being sarcastic

Hope that helps!

Rez
 Big thumbs up



Flightlineimages DOT Com Photographer & Web Editor. RR Turbines Specialist
User currently offlineChristhurtell From Australia, joined Apr 2004, 49 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (10 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1231 times:

thanks all, i was just curious

Chris


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
? About Baddouble posted Fri Aug 12 2005 18:12:05 by Spartan13
Puzzled By A Baddouble posted Tue Jul 26 2005 15:16:49 by Javibi
Baddouble Question ..again! posted Sat Jul 23 2005 05:18:25 by StealthZ
Baddouble Question.. posted Fri Jul 22 2005 15:12:46 by Johndm1957
Confusing Baddouble posted Fri Jul 22 2005 14:46:16 by JohnJ
Pleae Explain The Baddouble Rule posted Thu Jun 23 2005 01:38:22 by Photopilot
Baddouble ....... Again! posted Sat Jun 18 2005 22:37:27 by Malandan
A Better Idea Of Baddouble Please. posted Tue Jun 14 2005 10:52:37 by UA777222
BadDouble Question posted Fri May 20 2005 20:04:37 by WakeTurbulence
Baddouble Question posted Thu May 19 2005 23:11:31 by Gary2880