Dcrusafon From Spain, joined Apr 2004, 333 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week ago) and read 2345 times:
I know that it takes just a moment, but from my eyes I see it OK but I can be wrong.
I just wanted to share and have other opinions, and the reupload as the appeal function it is like do nothing. I had one pic during more than one month without response...
737heavy From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2002, 601 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week ago) and read 2336 times:
1 looks ok to me
2 looks like you might have used a wide angle lens, hense the poles not looking straight
3 runs downhill from left to right
4 I agree with the screener - it's about the aircraft not the people who make them work.
JeffM From United States of America, joined May 2005, 3266 posts, RR: 52
Reply 4, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week ago) and read 2336 times:
"I know that it takes just a moment, but from my eyes I see it OK but I can be wrong."
You are wrong. Look at the photos. If you learn to use the grid and or ruler you won't have this problem. One month in the appeal queue is not that bad. This topic gets beat to death every few weeks and the result is the same.
BADMOTIVE can be rephrased as "What are you trying to show us here?"
Ryangooner From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 969 posts, RR: 24
Reply 9, posted (9 years 6 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2066 times:
1. cockpit shot - im too distracted by the captains chair and the view out of the window.
2. I find im looking straight over the wing into the distance at the hills when maybe centralising the wing may have been better.
3. again i find myself staring into a big wide open green space with a terminal in the ditance somewhere - if i look hard enough to the right i see an engine and winglet (but only just)
4. I like what you had in mind but the aircraft is too small in the frame and im not too bothered about business men crossing runways.
I would say check your angles and also question your motiv behind the pic, ask yourself "what am i trying to show here" you need a focal point in the picture no.4 was nearly there, had it been a 747 that filled the frame with a business man running across the runway then marks out of ten would have been ten!
TZ From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2003, 1085 posts, RR: 53
Reply 10, posted (9 years 6 months 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 2025 times:
There is no such thing as "badlevel". The rejection for "not level" pictures is only:
The angle of the camera does not seem to be straight compared
to the horizon. In the future, make sure you always hold the
camera absolutely level. This particularly applies to pictures
of aircraft on the ground. For shots of aircraft in flight where
the ground is visible (take-offs and landings in particular),
the general rule is that the camera should be level with the
horizon and the aircraft be at an angle. There may be
exceptions to this rule if the composition of the picture is
unique and having a level horizon would detract from the
aesthetic value of the picture (such cases will be rare).
A good method for checking if the photo is leveled is to check
the verticals in the photo (if there are any) for really being vertical.
Such problems can often be fixed by carefully rotating and
cropping the picture. If you think you have been able to
improve the photos, please re-upload them. Note that we are
still very interested in having these photos in our database,
we only ask that you try to improve the quality of the digital
version of your photos.
Tamsin (a.net screening crew)
TZ Aviation - Aeropuerto de los Banditos Team Images