Bigphilnyc From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 4077 posts, RR: 51 Posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 3484 times:
I got email notification about the upload status of one of my photos.
This shot had been rejected months ago for badcameranagle, and I've since fixed it and reuploaded.
This time I got it back, rejected, with the only rejection reason being "badpersonal" with the message "sweet shot home slice", and no other explanation for rejection.
I'm just curious as to why this was rejected because I'd like to fix it. I was going to email the screeners but I heard others were having similar trouble and I wanted to gauge public experiences.
Was the screener being sarcastic with me in his rejection? Did he mean to accept it and in an effort to supply a personal message rejected it with badpersonal only? did he reject and forgot to click on the other reason?
Cancidas From Poland, joined Jul 2003, 4112 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3425 times:
to me, the plane looks a bit soft. then again, i'm on a shitty computer right now. i'll be able to look it over later on on a better monitor. then again, this is the same kind of work that i come up with. :-P all in all, it's a swet shot!
"...cannot the kingdom of salvation take me home."
Ryangooner From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 969 posts, RR: 20
Reply 4, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3410 times:
I like the shot myself and i love that angle......
but in contrast to your CRJ-700 shot there, the rejected one looks a tad soft on the tail and a the tiniest of bit on the reg.
maybe this is the reason check the markings on the tail - what do you think?
Clickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9790 posts, RR: 65
Reply 7, posted (11 years 2 months 1 week 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 3286 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW PHOTO SCREENER
Dude, its my fault.
I sent you an IM, explaining what happened, but I will explain it to the forum, too.
The shot had two screeners approval (HQ). I was the third HQ, which I did, but I also sent you a message in the approval email, and for some reason it rejected the shot as badpersonalmessage (I think).
My intent was to tell you what a good shot it was, the result was an unwarranted rejection. I apologize for that. Please reupload the shot and we can get it added to the database.