Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Unsharp Mask - Lost Settings  
User currently offlineWork4bmi From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (10 years 3 months 21 hours ago) and read 2731 times:

Hello, just a quick one! I had to re-install my Adobe software and forgot to jot down the unsharp mask tool settings that I "used"... I was just wondering what you use, so I can tinker on my images and see what looks best (again)

Thanks,

Aaron

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGo3Team From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3267 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (10 years 3 months 21 hours ago) and read 2701 times:

For me, 1 setting did not work on all my pictures. Some would be 200, and others would be below 100. I just depended on how it looked when I got done. But then again, with my rejection rating, I need some work too.


Yay Pudding!
User currently offlineSesd97 From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 116 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (10 years 3 months 20 hours ago) and read 2702 times:

Hi ... I use 30%, 0.3 radius and 0 levels .... click multiple times till jaggies appear and then back-off a few times till sharp .... hope this helps, Shaun

User currently offlineSkymonster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 3 months 20 hours ago) and read 2691 times:

100 (or thereabouts, depending on each picture), 0.7, 1 - wham, bam, thankyou mam! Big grin

Andy


User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 3 months 20 hours ago) and read 2676 times:

hehe

500%, .5 Radius, 5 Levels.

100% acceptance on last batch.


User currently offlineSiggi757 From Iceland, joined Oct 2001, 123 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 3 months 20 hours ago) and read 2672 times:

Hi.

USM can also be used to increase the dynamic range in ones pictures. In other words to get rid of the gray dullness (lacking better words) and give pictures that extra kick.

I got this setting from the brilliant website www.luminous-landscape.com.

Set radius to 50 pixels, threshold to 0 and experiment with the amount until your picture looks good. Usually amount of 5-10 % gives good results.

For sharpening I first resize the picture to desired size and then set radius to
0.2 pixels and threshold to 0. Then I adjust the amount to desired setting. I find that 3 applications of amount 100% gives better results than 1 application of amount 300%.

Try the dynamic range method. You won't be disappointed.

Best regards,

Siggi Ben  Smile


User currently offlineDehowie From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 1066 posts, RR: 33
Reply 6, posted (10 years 3 months 20 hours ago) and read 2665 times:

No one rule is a good way to sharpen as its a pretty powerful tool.
Canon 10D's require more hsharpening as they produce softer images but conversly these images allow far more sharpening.
I use Focalblade a plugin which allows you to shepen edges and surfaces seperately and is well worth the price and then some.
I apply 400,0.1,0 to edges and 100,0.1,0.
The advantage of the Canon here is it allows between 3-5 passes with those setiings and very little noise but you could not do that with normal USM because it hits the entire picture not just the edges.
The extra flexibility allows you to get crisp edges yet avoid noise buildup in open surface area's.
Probebly the best tool i have ever seen for PS.
Darren



2EOS1DX,EF14.2.8LII,17TS,85/1.2,16-35L,24-70LII,24L,70-200F2.8LII,100-400,300/400/500/800L
User currently offlineAviopic From Netherlands, joined Mar 2004, 2681 posts, RR: 41
Reply 7, posted (10 years 3 months 15 hours ago) and read 2624 times:

Darren got a point with his statement.
USM works on a difference in contrast and because noise is exactly that there is always a chance to increase noise levels while applying USM.
In other words get your levels and contrast right then remove noise before any USM is applied.
For that i use Fred Miranda's noise remover and sharpening pro which gives you a lot more control and better results in the end.




The truth lives in one’s mind, it doesn’t really exist
User currently offlineWork4bmi From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (10 years 3 months 8 hours ago) and read 2561 times:

Hello,

Thanks for the replies folks! I cant wait to get my inages tweaked with some of these suggestions. I am set to get my 20D Saturday, so I hope to produce some good results.

Continue with other advise if possible though, as am sure others apart from myself will gain some good knowledge/tips from the input.

Thanks,


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Settings Unsharp Mask Settings posted Wed Mar 30 2005 01:44:08 by Jetman41
Your Unsharp Mask Settings posted Fri Jun 21 2002 19:13:42 by LGW
Unsharp Mask posted Mon Apr 26 2004 02:05:59 by Syncmaster
Adaptive Unsharp Mask posted Thu Apr 8 2004 20:16:54 by Lanpie
What Unsharp Mask Level? posted Sat Jul 5 2003 12:18:45 by Work4bmi
Check Out This Unsharp Mask Technique posted Thu Jan 31 2002 19:12:03 by EDIpic
Sharpen Or Unsharp Mask? posted Wed Nov 21 2001 20:10:49 by LGW
Unsharp Mask posted Wed May 23 2001 10:45:21 by Andyhunt
Unsharp Mask posted Sat Apr 28 2001 14:48:10 by PhilB
Unsharp Mask Is Better! posted Tue Sep 26 2000 07:22:41 by USAir_757