Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Another One Of My Rants...This Shot Rejected  
User currently offlineKaddyuk From Wallis and Futuna, joined Nov 2001, 4126 posts, RR: 26
Posted (9 years 10 months 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 3868 times:

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=NW_N224NW_DC10_EHAM_250904.jpg

This rejected for low asthetics

WTF?

The photos were of low esthetic qualities - bad angle, included
window reflections (for shots taken through glass such as terminal windows),


Cant be that

pictured just a part of an aircraft (with no motivation, like a special
sticker, damage etc., for doing so), out of focus, distracting or
obstructing objects in the foreground or similar


Its a front end shot, thats the motivation... I wanted to get a closer look at the front half just like other shots quite the same... If this was the reason, surely Bad Crop would be more appropriate

or did not picture an aircraft or anything sufficiently
related to aviation at all. Finally, you might read this because your camera
displays the date in the lower right corner of the image. If so, please
disable that feature in the future.


Thats not applicable in this situation


I am thinking of appealing as was screened by a Screener in training, but is it worth it before I add to Johans workload?

1/80th shot came out pretty well IMO.

Comments/Critique would be great Big grin



Whoever said "laughter is the best medicine" never had Gonorrhea
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWhaley From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 44 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (9 years 10 months 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 3833 times:

I'm not a screener and have about half of my first uploads rejected, but I like the picture. I would have made it just a little brighter, and personally I prefer not to crop that tight (but apparently the screeners do), but I like the panning shot, with the plane very sharp yet the background 'moving'. The only real reason I could think of is that it's a crop (the plane is not fully shown) but I think in this case it only enhances the feeling of the shot. I'd like to know the reason(s) for rejecting it as much as you do  Smile

User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9609 posts, RR: 69
Reply 2, posted (9 years 10 months 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 3830 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Kevin, I wasn't the one who rejected the shot, but I did ask for a second opinion as to the motiv...for me the shot is neither a nose shot or a half shot containing the wing and/or engines.

For me it just didn't look right.


User currently offlineSesd97 From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 116 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (9 years 10 months 1 week ago) and read 3774 times:

Kevin, great picture, I really like it !  Big thumbs up

...but, ...probably that's why I'm not a screener ... Wink/being sarcastic


User currently offlineKaddyuk From Wallis and Futuna, joined Nov 2001, 4126 posts, RR: 26
Reply 4, posted (9 years 10 months 1 week ago) and read 3761 times:

Okay, so maybe a re-crop and then resubmit might get it accepted...

Where would be a good place to crop?




Whoever said "laughter is the best medicine" never had Gonorrhea
User currently offlineSukhoi From Sweden, joined May 2006, 373 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (9 years 10 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3676 times:

Badcloning if you ask me look at the mess you made of the radome  Wink/being sarcastic

User currently offlineChris78cpr From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2819 posts, RR: 51
Reply 6, posted (9 years 10 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3670 times:

Unlucky Kev! I thought it was an awesome shot, try a diff crop!

Good luck! I'll call you soon, i got that message you left me! Been busy with college!  Laugh out loud

Chris



5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
User currently offlineMirage From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3122 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (9 years 10 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3657 times:

"Badcloning if you ask me look at the mess you made of the radome"


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Chaim Van Prooyen



Not badcloning for sure, bad cropping, no space on the left and an engine cutted in half.

Luis


User currently offlineQantas077 From Australia, joined Jan 2004, 5850 posts, RR: 40
Reply 8, posted (9 years 10 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3612 times:

i'm not sure but i don't like the fact that the nosewheels are almost blended in with the black background, nice shot though!


a true friend is someone who sees the pain in your eyes, while everyone else believes the smile on your face.
User currently offlinePhotopilot From Canada, joined Jul 2002, 2720 posts, RR: 18
Reply 9, posted (9 years 10 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3584 times:

Forget about the screeners. You like the shot..... it's a good photo for you to be proud of. Acceptance is just the icing on the cake, not the end of the world.
To improve this photo, I'd overall lighten the image a tad then mask and lighten the nose wheel a bit more so it separates visually from the background. It definately needs this. Perhaps a bit of artfull and very carefull dodging along the edge with a soft edge brush to give a little 3 dimensional highlight to the tires.
Next, I'd totally burn down the piece of horizontal wing/stab that shows below the engine. It's visually distracting from the photo and adds no usefull info. No cloning it out, that's not allowed, but masking and buring it down as far as possible is within the rules.
And lastly, I'd open up the crop by about 10-15% to give it a little more breathing room.
Other than that, great shot. I'd tweak it a bit and re-submit.

Steve


User currently offlineDehowie From Australia, joined Feb 2004, 1057 posts, RR: 33
Reply 10, posted (9 years 10 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 3553 times:

Nice shot and very sharp indeed for a motion blur shot.
Very nice indeed.
Darren



2EOS1DX,EF14.2.8LII,17TS,85/1.2,16-35L,24-70LII,24L,70-200F2.8LII,100-400,300/400/500/800L
User currently offlineLaw4fun From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 135 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (9 years 10 months 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3449 times:

Who gives a hang what the screener who rejected it thinks...it is a super shot that you should and can be very proud of. Look at it as your gain and A.net's loss if it is not added to the data base.


Canon Shutter Slut
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
One Of My Best Pics Rejected, Why? posted Mon Sep 24 2001 22:32:56 by Jon01
Found One Of My Pictures Through A Subscription posted Fri Nov 3 2006 00:24:42 by F4wso
Help/criticism Required On One Of My First Uploads posted Fri Apr 14 2006 01:47:24 by Aviamil
Northwest Wants To Use One Of My Photos! posted Tue Jan 31 2006 00:31:16 by AlitaliaMD11
One Of My Photos Has Disappeared - What To Do? posted Fri Nov 18 2005 00:07:19 by Ua935
One Of My Photos On EBay posted Sun Oct 23 2005 19:03:24 by Ander
Another "help, My Photo Has Been Rejected" Thread! posted Sat Jul 16 2005 22:52:51 by TupolevTu154
Another Round Of "Is This Worthy?" posted Mon Apr 11 2005 22:56:05 by WakeTurbulence
One Of My Photos Disappeared posted Mon Nov 15 2004 20:26:30 by TWAMD-80
Rhaa One Of My Pics Got Stolen By A Magazine! posted Wed Nov 10 2004 09:27:51 by 707cmf