Thom@s From Norway, joined Oct 2000, 11963 posts, RR: 41
Reply 1, posted
Thu Oct 28 2004 10:43:57 UTC (11 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 3545 times:
If it's the same reg, then it would most likely still get rejected. However, if your photos are showing two different aircraft then the double thing shouldn't be a problem.
As it got rejected, I assume it was the same reg?
"If guns don't kill people, people kill people - does that mean toasters don't toast toast, toast toast toast?"
Pumaknight From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted
Thu Oct 28 2004 10:45:00 UTC (11 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 3543 times:
Tis a nice photo....but I am not sure an appeal is worthwhile. There must be tonnes of at gate KLM 737s......just my thought though....and I am no expert at this uplaoding poker game
Mygind66 From Spain, joined exactly 12 years ago today! , 1058 posts, RR: 10
Reply 3, posted
Thu Oct 28 2004 22:28:18 UTC (11 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3482 times:
I've seen worse baddoubles (identical copies..) in a same plane, same day, same position...and got both uploaded...theorically should be a baddouble but if you think is no so *double for you..appeal it...and wait for months for a final decision...
AGrayson514 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 396 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted
Thu Oct 28 2004 23:49:08 UTC (11 years 6 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3449 times:
Thats not even at the same spot. Its a totally different gate, totally different background etc. I'd appeal. You don't exactly have anything to lose, now do you?
~ Andrew Grayson
Give a little bit...
FUAirliner From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 538 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted
Fri Oct 29 2004 19:00:02 UTC (11 years 6 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 3392 times:
Definitely baddouble, it's the exact aircraft from the same angle at the same airport. Considering other baddouble rejections which are occasionally posted on this forum, an appeal would be only a waste of time.
Frank Unterspann - Hamburg, Germany
Karlok From Netherlands, joined Mar 2002, 839 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted
Fri Oct 29 2004 19:20:46 UTC (11 years 6 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 3386 times:
I would not appeal it anymore, the quality is also not SUPERB
Andrewuber From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 2528 posts, RR: 32
Reply 7, posted
Fri Oct 29 2004 23:50:08 UTC (11 years 6 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 3365 times:
Not being mean here, but frankly there's no point in appealing - there are shots nearing two months old in the appeal queue. Don't know what's up with that.
Your shot is great. Nice size comparison next to the massive 744. It's clear, clean and should have been included in the d/b IMHO.
I'd rather shoot BAD_MOTIVE
Syncmaster From United States of America, joined Jul 2002, 2081 posts, RR: 9
Reply 8, posted
Fri Oct 29 2004 23:55:01 UTC (11 years 6 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 3361 times:
I agree with Drew...I just gave up and deleted my two photos I had in the appeal queue because I was tired of waiting.
Both shots are great, they might be the same angle but when it comes down to it everything but the physical plane in the foreground is diffferent and IMHO it should have been accepted as well.