Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
More Rejections  
User currently offlineTWAMD-80 From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 1006 posts, RR: 4
Posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1886 times:

Recently after my last upload, I got a string of rejections. For a few of the shots and didn't see how the reason for the rejection fit the photo. Maybe it is just me. The following were rejected for badangle. When I edited the pictures, I aligned the grid with the indentations on STL tower.

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=6047_AA_md83_N961TW_10304_stl_e.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=6042_US_cl6002c10_N780PS_10304_stl_e2.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=5700_DL_737232_N316DL_91904_stl_e.jpg

The next shot was taken right at sunset and was rejected for badcolor:
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=6079_WN_7377H4_N788SA_102404_stl_e.jpg

The next one was rejected for badquality. I can see where the screener is coming from, and I am wondering if there is a way that I can fix it or should I try an appeal?
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=6087_NW_DC941_N762NW_102404_stl_e.jpg

Finally for my last one. I uploaded this awhile ago and it was rejected for badinfo. When I reuploaded it with the corrected information, it was rejected for badquality.
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rejphoto.main?filename=5086_usaf_C17_891189_9604_sus_e.jpg


I'd appreciate any input on these photos and any suggestions on what I can to do prevent this in the future. Thanks,

Tim


Two A-4's, left ten o'clock level continue left turn!
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9633 posts, RR: 68
Reply 1, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1874 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

For the unlevel ones, rotate them CCW about .2 or so.

The screener consensus on the WN shot was it was too orange. I think 7 or 8 of us had the same conclusion.

The badquality is a cool shot, but I dont know if it can be brought up to par.

Dunno. Seems washed out and over sharpened.


User currently offlineKarlok From Netherlands, joined Mar 2002, 839 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1829 times:

For 1,2 and 3. It's sure bad level, alignment with just the tower is not always enough. Try to get a good level feeling when watching the photo.

4, too red/orange.

5, nice photo, but not sharp. It's camera shake. Not much you can do about it.

6, lack of contract IMO, also some motion blur and jagged lines.

RGDS/Kar-lok


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
More Rejections..... posted Mon Jul 17 2006 00:17:36 by N723GW
Some More Rejections ... posted Sat Apr 22 2006 23:34:39 by LukasMako
More Rejections posted Mon Feb 27 2006 13:44:32 by AirKas1
More Rejections. Help Wanted! posted Thu Dec 29 2005 18:34:09 by Linco22
YAY More Rejections! posted Tue Dec 14 2004 23:18:26 by DLKAPA
More Rejections posted Wed Nov 3 2004 05:29:55 by TWAMD-80
More Rejections :( posted Fri Apr 16 2004 01:18:57 by TWAMD-80
More Rejections Than Acceptances!.....Help posted Tue Apr 13 2004 23:54:40 by Hpr7
More Rejections. Haha. Help Please. posted Mon Mar 15 2004 21:07:21 by Vaman
Some More Rejections, What's Wrong With Them? posted Sun Nov 30 2003 21:33:46 by Paulianer