Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Canon 100-400 L Is On A Tripod?  
User currently offlineMfz From Germany, joined Aug 2004, 259 posts, RR: 2
Posted (9 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 8086 times:

Hi everybody!

In a review of the Canon 100-400 L IS at http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/400v400.shtml
I have just read that the IS of this lens cannot be used when mounting the lens on a tripod. The IS of the 70-200 L IS on the other hand can. What is the reason for this? Where is the difference in the two versions of the IS? Are both equally suitable for spotting?

In case this subject has already been covered in this forum please post the link.

Thank you very much already for your help! Best regards,

mfz


Extra Bavariam non est vita et si est non est ita! --- My flights: http://my.flightmemory.com/mfz
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBrick From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 1578 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (9 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 8004 times:

Not sure what they are talking about. My Canon 100-400mm IS has a tripod collar that works just fine...

Mark



A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man...
User currently offlineIL76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2237 posts, RR: 49
Reply 2, posted (9 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 7992 times:

Perhaps others can confirm or correct me, but I think the 70-200 has a newer generation of the IS system, which obviously (as luminous landscape states?) can be mounted on a tripod with IS switched on. The 100-400 could get confused if IS is switched on when the camera is completely still, causing IS lens-group to shake. I have not noticed this yet, but people with the 100-400 have been advised (informally, I don't know what Canon has said) to switch off the IS when taking shots from a tripod. Which isn't a problem really, since you don't need IS on a tripod.
Cheers,
Eduard

[Edited 2004-11-06 21:09:26]

User currently offlineWoody001 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 529 posts, RR: 22
Reply 3, posted (9 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 7955 times:

The manual of my 100-400 does say to shut off the IS when mounted on a tripod, the gyros may cause movement and hence give a blurred image. Unfortunately not owning a 70-200 IS I can't comment  Sad

I can't see why you'd need the IS turned on if the tripod was stout enough to hold the equipment still enough..?

Ian.



If I could just get the afterburner working...
User currently offlineMygind66 From Spain, joined May 2004, 1058 posts, RR: 12
Reply 4, posted (9 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 7949 times:

..

Respecting my 300/F4 IS the manual says I have to switch the IS off in case of tripod used...Opossite to this recommendation I've read in this forum that you can use it with no problems...

Colin...are you there? We (all) need your help... Big grin

Enrique


User currently offlineN317AS From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 7927 times:

I use the 100-400L IS lens on a tripod all the time, with IS on. Not for spotting though. I leave IS on and don't use a tripod for aircraft. More for wildlife. I never noticed it freaking out on a tripod. When it does gyro shake is when it is not on a tripod, and I am following an aircraft at 45 degrees. It doesn't know if it is going side to side or up and down. So it shakes and makes a hell of a racket. For a quite camera anywy.

User currently offlineMfz From Germany, joined Aug 2004, 259 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (9 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 7830 times:

@ all

Thanks a lot so far for your help! Your comments cleared things up a bit for me. I also assumed that you wouldn't really need the IS when using a tripod, but I just wanted to hear some experiences from people with more expertise in this field. But I guess essentially it comes back to "trial and error" with each lens to find out what happens.  Smile/happy/getting dizzy I don't own the lens yet but I am very tempted to get one really soon...

@N317AS

Your comment about the IS freaking out when you tilt the camera (and thus the lens...) to a 45 degree angle however was quite interesting. Good to know that in those cases it might be better to switch the IS off.



Extra Bavariam non est vita et si est non est ita! --- My flights: http://my.flightmemory.com/mfz
User currently offlineRyan h From Australia, joined Aug 2001, 1530 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (9 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 7793 times:

What about using the lens with a monopod?


South Australian Spotter
User currently offlineLyzzard From Singapore, joined Nov 2003, 404 posts, RR: 14
Reply 8, posted (9 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 7785 times:

You don't have to switch off IS while using the 100-400L on a tripod. You're supposed to put it into IS mode 2 which only stabalizes on the X axis, as opposed to mode 1 which stabalizes on all axis. I don't quite understand the rationale behind that but that's what the manual says.

Likewise for the 300/4L IS. Most of the newer generation IS lenses do sport the dual modes, unlike the older ones.

[Edited 2004-11-07 13:47:34]

User currently offlineMygind66 From Spain, joined May 2004, 1058 posts, RR: 12
Reply 9, posted (9 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 7768 times:

..

Lyzzard...thanks for clarifying me the matter.

Enrique


User currently offlineMfz From Germany, joined Aug 2004, 259 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (9 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 7761 times:

@ Lyzzard

Thanks a lot for the information! I can see clearly now...  Wink/being sarcastic



Extra Bavariam non est vita et si est non est ita! --- My flights: http://my.flightmemory.com/mfz
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Canon 100-400 Is And The Sigma 50-500mm posted Thu Oct 20 2005 05:07:51 by LOT767-300ER
Canon 100-400 Is Vs. 70-200 Is + 2x Conv. posted Wed Aug 11 2004 18:52:38 by Canberra
Canon 100-400 L IS, Advice Required :-) posted Wed May 26 2004 09:31:47 by Jkw777
My First Canon 100-400 Is Photos posted Fri Apr 2 2004 00:43:54 by Woody001
Canon Converter 1,4x With 100-400 L Is F/5,6 posted Tue Aug 15 2006 19:35:56 by Coninpa
Canon 28-300 Is USM Vs. 100-400 Is USM posted Wed Sep 28 2005 19:16:27 by Stefan
Canon 100-400L IS: Come With Tripod Collar? posted Sun Jul 11 2004 02:32:18 by Bronko
Help Needed: Canon 100-400 Mm Is Lens posted Thu Jan 29 2004 11:12:21 by Paulianer
Canon 100-400mm Is Autofocus Problem posted Mon Oct 23 2006 17:33:10 by Singel09
Canon 100-400 Seizing Up. posted Mon Jul 31 2006 09:54:09 by Spencer