EGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 33 Posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2691 times:
I haven't really been out much this year so photo's from me have been very slow, if not non existent. Add to that the fact that I've lost most of my photos from the last 2 years when my computer blew earlier this year (twist of fate, my backup DVD was in the DVD drive when the power supply surged and was corrupted). But since then i've had 1 trip abroad to Barcelona. I got really lucky with a passing aircraft and somehow managed to snap a picture of it.
I'm pretty sure i've managed to get a superior edit out of it since then but i'm wondering whether there's any point. Any help is appreciated! I can see its a bit grainy and a bit soft (you won't BELIEVE how dirty the windows were, I always seem to have this problem with Boeing's).
LHSebi From Germany, joined Jan 2004, 1049 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2652 times:
Can you perhaps tell us why this was rejected? From your explanation, I'm guessing badquality. If that's the case, I don't know if any of the new photos are any better. I however much prefer the final edit you posted up. Very lucky to have gotten that shot! Nice job!
By the way, may I suggest you name your uploads something more appropriate than "BA757"?
I guess that's what happens in the end, you start thinking about the beginning.
EGGD From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2001, 12443 posts, RR: 33
Reply 4, posted (10 years 6 months 2 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2641 times:
If you think the color is wrong in the modified version, here's the original .
I'm surprised it came out even half presentable...!
edit: Yes the reason was badquality, which I can understand in a way, I was just hoping there was a chance of getting it onto the database as it means quite alot to me. I realized after uploading that perhaps the filename was not the most appropriate, result of a rusty photo processing technique I think .