Vaman From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 328 posts, RR: 0 Posted (11 years 6 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 3031 times:
I'm just curious what exactly about his image gave it the bad quality reject. I though it was one of the better ones of the batch. But alas, the screeners are wiser than me ( I mean that sincerely not sarcastically). Again, not arguing just trying to learn. Thanks for the input.
Vaman From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 328 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (11 years 6 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2996 times:
Clickhappy, you picked a perfect definition for esoteric. "or understood by only a particular group." ----the term Bad Quality being the object and the group being those who understand what is wrong with the pic. A synonym is mysterious. I was just trying to spice up the title instead of being the 1000000th Badquality help post..
And if you would care to explain the best shadow detail bringing out techiniques...i'm all ears.
MissedApproach From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 713 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (11 years 6 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 2907 times:
It would be nice if there was an FAQ section on photo editing techniques, I'm sure the same questions get asked many times. I have a collection of rejection notices, & while I usually see what the screeners mean after they point it out, I don't understand how to fix it.