Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Two Strange Rejection Reasons?!?  
User currently offlineBeechcraft From Germany, joined Nov 2003, 828 posts, RR: 41
Posted (10 years 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 3240 times:

Hi all,
maybe some screener, or the one who screened my photos this morning could
explain those rejections to me.

This one was rejected as badinfo

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/rix1denis.jpg

This is the corresponding upload info:

Upload id: 688659
rix1denis.jpg
Unknown
-
-
Riga - International (Skulte) (RIX / EVRA)
Latvia, December 12, 2004
Reg:
Code:
Cn:
On short final RWY 36 in RIX
Denis Roschlau
Meant for sale: Yes
Categories: AIRPORT Rejection time: 2004-12-15 06:06:15 Reject reason: badinfo

All my overviews or approach shots have been added with that kind of information, i think. Am i overlooking something? Any help is appreciated.

This one was rejected as badmotive
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/lh-d-aclk1denis.jpg

I agree, it is a just CRJ, but i hope it isn´t badmotive just for that  Smile/happy/getting dizzy
Also, i would be happy about any advice.

Thanks,

Denis


That's it! You people have stood in my way long enough. I'm going to clown college!
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2037 posts, RR: 32
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 3211 times:

Denis,

Regarding your CRJ, I don't anything wrong with it motive wise, and the woman is even fully clothed  Wink/being sarcastic But it is a little dark in the bottom half - maybe that's the reason?

I hope you can get it in, I really like the composition.

Cheers


James



It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlineJaspike From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2008, 1 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 3170 times:

For the airport overview, I'm presuming the "Unknown" was for the airline field. If so, this should always be a single hypen: -
(The same for aircraft and aircraft_generic)

The category "AIRPORT" is partly correct, because no part of the aircraft it was taken from is visible. Though I would have uploaded it as "AIRPORT,DARK".
It shouldn't be "AIRPORT,WINDOW_VIEW" or "AIRPORT,COCKPIT" because no part of the aircraft that it was taken from is visible.

With these two small changes, the info would be 100% correct  Smile

Tom
Database Editor


User currently offlineJan Mogren From Sweden, joined Dec 2000, 2043 posts, RR: 50
Reply 3, posted (10 years 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3059 times:

Airport, DARK ?

Why is that?

/JM



AeroPresentation - Airline DVD's filmed in High Definition
User currently offlineJaspike From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2008, 1 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (10 years 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3034 times:

Because the sun is setting... it's one of those photos where it's hard to decide if it should go in the dark category or not  Big grin

Tom


User currently offlineStaffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3030 times:

Sun setting?? That sun is higher than it's here at noon.

Staffan


User currently offlineJaspike From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2008, 1 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (10 years 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3025 times:

Sun setting?? That sun is higher than it's here at noon.
Well that's what it looks like in the image anyway, and that's what matters  Smile

Tom

[Edited 2004-12-15 18:10:03]

User currently offlineChris78cpr From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2822 posts, RR: 50
Reply 7, posted (10 years 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3004 times:

Tom,

Can you shed any light on why the CRJ was rejected? I looked at it and couldn't work out what made it badmotiv.

Chris



5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
User currently offlineJan Mogren From Sweden, joined Dec 2000, 2043 posts, RR: 50
Reply 8, posted (10 years 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2994 times:

I seriously doubt that people clicking the Night/dusk/dawn category is expecting shots made in broad daylight like this one.

/JM



AeroPresentation - Airline DVD's filmed in High Definition
User currently offlineFiveholer From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1013 posts, RR: 14
Reply 9, posted (10 years 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2988 times:

I like the CRJ shot, cool angle in my opinion.

Danny



Bring back Bethune!
User currently offlineJaspike From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2008, 1 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (10 years 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2983 times:

Re. the CRJ - I haven't got a clue really.. maybe it's the person in the doorway? You'd have to get the view of a screener  Smile

Nice shot though  Big thumbs up

Tom


User currently offlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3064 posts, RR: 58
Reply 11, posted (10 years 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2969 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Denis

I agree with some of the other comments concerning the CRJ photo - I really like the composition. Although, on the basis of some of my rejections, I am surprised that you didn't get a badcameraangle, as it seems to me the horizon isn't level.

I would argue there should be a place in a high quality database such as this for more 'artistic' images, as the use of the wide angle here really works in my opinion (also helps the cloudscape). Plus I like the low light levels. Good photo.  Big thumbs up

Paul


User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2465 posts, RR: 44
Reply 12, posted (10 years 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2924 times:

Might be the person in the shot .
Im not too sure but i think they are very strict on this issue now .
(regarding people in shots )
They have to be relevant to the picture.



On a wing and a prayer
User currently onlineKereru From New Zealand, joined Jun 2003, 873 posts, RR: 45
Reply 13, posted (10 years 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 2891 times:

Might be the person in the shot

Could also be the steps even though they are part of the aircraft? This view is not favored generally although some similar have been accepted if rare and old. Please do not go and look through the database and add examples here of those that have made it through the system as I am only offering a possible answer to your question. I did not personally reject this one but I am offering an explanation as to why it was rejected. People as already mentioned above are not in favor and the steps are quite intrusive on the overall shot.

As you can see by these shots they are much cleaner looking and the aircraft is the main subject rather than stairs and a lady?


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © John Farrington
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Krzysztof Skowronski [epwa_spotters]



Cheers,
Colin



Good things take Time.
User currently offlineCorey07850 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2528 posts, RR: 5
Reply 14, posted (10 years 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 2883 times:

Maybe badmotiv for the GPU line??

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Did You Ever Have Five Rejection Reasons? posted Mon May 22 2006 22:11:58 by TS
Another Strange Rejection posted Mon May 22 2006 18:47:02 by Aero145
New Rejection Reasons-where Are They Detailed? posted Wed Aug 17 2005 09:59:48 by UA935
Definitions Of All Rejection Reasons posted Mon May 30 2005 17:42:41 by Bubbles
Different Rejection Reasons? posted Thu Feb 19 2004 22:02:25 by AirKas1
Strange Rejection posted Fri Feb 6 2004 21:54:55 by Janne
Questionable Rejection Reasons? posted Tue Jan 15 2002 17:40:53 by Atco
Strange Info Rejection posted Sun Jul 16 2006 23:51:39 by Pauara
Strange Issue With Rejection posted Thu Oct 6 2005 08:10:52 by Psych
Two Screeners .. Two Reject Reasons posted Fri May 28 2004 19:59:27 by S.p.a.s.