Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Baddistance Criteria?  
User currently offlineVzlet From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 835 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2494 times:

I'd like to ask screeners to elaborate a little on the "distance" rule. (Input from other uploaders is welcome as well.) My questions are prompted by a string of "baddistance" rejections, but I'll try not to make this a gripe/whine session.
First of all, what does a screener look for to determine compliance for "distance"? Is there a strict requirement, or even a general rule of thumb for the amount of the frame that should filled by the aircraft (i.e., 800 pixels from a width of 1024), or is it a generally subjective matter? (I'm not implying that subjectivity is undesirable here. In fact, I think it would be necessary.)

Secondly, what consideration is given to showing an aircraft's activity rather than just the aircraft? I'll give some specific examples for this one. This (clickable) A-10 shot couldn't be much tighter and still show the bomb impacting alongside the target. It's similar in concept to the logging shot in that a wider view is necessary to see "the whole picture".

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Markus Herzig

In this CF-18 shot, I felt that the rocket's trail imparted the same sense of path and motion that vortices, contrails, and airshow smoke do and is an integral part of the image.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Willem Honders

Finally, I'll add that I can see a clear difference in "distance" criteria between this C-141 shot and Mike's and Juan's sunset images: Additional zoom would have only detracted from their spectacular results, whereas my shot would have benefited from more.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Mike "Rotor" Nowak
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Juan Carlos Guerra Aviation Photography of Mexico

(And I'll note that I'm not claiming aesthetic parity with any of the other photographers' shots here.) Screeners, I hope that any input you provide will save contributors and yourselves time and effort in the future. Thanks for reading this far!
-Mark



"That's so stupid! If they're so secret, why are they out where everyone can see them?" - my kid
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAdministrator From Sweden, joined May 1999, 3251 posts.
Reply 1, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 2467 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
SITE ADMIN

Like with all rejections, it is very difficult to give you exact limits to where a photo is baddistance and where it isn't. It very much depends on the other perceived values of the photo. For instance, if a screener deems that the artistic qualities of a photo is helped by the distance to the aircraft (showing possibly a sunset or clouds or similar), the photo will be accepted. If on the other hand the screener deems the photo less interesting due to the distance to the aircraft, the photo might be rejected. Furthermore, the decision depends on how rare the aircraft pictured is - if the aircraft is rare there's a bigger chance that a normally "baddistance" photo would be accepted.

Like with all rejection reasons, I have setup the basic rules that the screeners should judge a photo by. However, most cases aren't crisp clear and the screener must make a choice for himself whether a border-case photo should be accepted or not.

Regards,
Johan



Working on the site from morning 'till night that's livin' alright (1997-2007)
User currently offlineVzlet From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 835 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2402 times:

Johan:
Thanks for the quick response. I realize why the screening process can't be accomplished without subjectivity, but if those basic rules are significantly more detailed than the "Upload FAQ", would you consider making them available somewhere on the site?

Screeners:
I'd still be interested in hearing any of your views "from the trenches". Most of the work I submit is older stuff and I generally try to select unique pictures that I think other people will find interesting, but I know I'm starting off from a quality disadvantage compared to current work.

-Mark



"That's so stupid! If they're so secret, why are they out where everyone can see them?" - my kid
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A.net Criteria? posted Sat Nov 4 2006 19:22:13 by CYEGsTankers
Baddistance? What Is The Standard? posted Fri Sep 2 2005 17:39:57 by J.mo
Did The Criteria For Bad Motive Change? posted Thu Aug 25 2005 10:21:38 by FlyingZacko
Help With Baddistance posted Tue Jun 28 2005 07:25:00 by F9Widebody
Baddistance Or Worth An Upload? posted Mon Jun 13 2005 20:45:48 by Thom@s
Quick Question About Criteria/upload Form posted Sat May 7 2005 16:33:48 by Sulman
I Don't See How This Is Baddistance? posted Fri May 6 2005 23:54:11 by APFPilot1985
Badcentered,baddistance Rejection posted Tue Apr 5 2005 23:46:00 by SoBe
Baddistance - Worth Appealing? posted Sun Mar 27 2005 05:57:47 by TransIsland
Bad Criteria .. Suspect posted Wed Feb 16 2005 13:51:53 by StealthZ