Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
1D MkII Vs. 20D - What Justifies The Price?  
User currently offlineBREmer From Germany, joined May 2004, 551 posts, RR: 15
Posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 2924 times:

The 1D Mk II is a professional camera while the 20D is only a semi-pro camera.
However, what are the exact facts that distinguishes the two cameras so much that a 1D MkII is more than twice the price for a 20D? That's a lot of money.
What moves people to opt for the MkII? Just curious to know.  Smile

Cheers Lukas

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineKaddyuk From Wallis and Futuna, joined Nov 2001, 4126 posts, RR: 23
Reply 1, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 2894 times:

Durability, Reliability...

It has a better and faster processer, better color processing, faster AF, more AF points, 1.3 crop factor... All sorts really...

Whoever said "laughter is the best medicine" never had Gonorrhea
User currently offlineTin67 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 268 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (11 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 2863 times:

When I sold my 10D just prior to the 20D's launch, it was my every intention to replace it with the 20D.

I happened to be changing lenses at the time also and actually tried out the 1D MkII. Okay this doesn't justify it's price tag, but the feel, build quality and features simply eclipsed that of my old 10D and at that moment I wanted one.

I went away and thought about it for a while, afterall the 20D was being offered at very low introductory prices. Also if you consider the Canon consumer SLR camera market, there has been the D30, D60, 10D, 300D and now the 20D. This is a huge growth market and is prone to change more quickly. In 12-18 months time there will be a replacement for the 300D and 20D.

The professional range doesn't seem to change so frequently and I consider the EOS 1D MkII to be a camera that I will not outgrow in a hurry. I will probably never use it to it's full potential, and I will not be looking to upgrade anytime soon given my investment.

Overall I think the 1D MkII was the right choice for me.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Canon 300D...or What's Better For The Price? posted Tue Dec 28 2004 11:38:25 by Andz
Cyeg - What Is The Problem With Security? posted Fri Sep 29 2006 23:06:26 by Psyops
Too Artsy+ What About The Contrast? posted Thu Sep 21 2006 18:06:51 by Rotate
20D LCD On The Frizz... posted Fri Sep 15 2006 17:52:47 by Fiveholer
With A Limited Budget What Is The Best SLR? posted Sat Jul 29 2006 19:43:11 by COEXpilot
What Is The Meaning Of "motive" Rejection? posted Wed Apr 5 2006 09:35:44 by Walter2222
What Is The Problem!? posted Tue Feb 21 2006 14:46:56 by Martin21
What Is The Meaning Of F/4-5.6 In A Lens? posted Tue Feb 7 2006 14:21:08 by TACAA320
What Is The Difference? posted Thu Dec 8 2005 15:19:41 by Nirmalmakadia
What Is The Latest On The FRA Observation Deck? posted Sun Oct 2 2005 13:41:25 by F4wso