Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Opinions On This Photo  
User currently offlineTim From Australia, joined Jun 2000, 705 posts, RR: 3
Posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 3463 times:

G'day all,

What do you think my chances are of getting this photo accepted? It is a Beech 60 Duke. I took it a few weeks ago at Jandakot Airport (Australias Busiest Airport).

It has now been in the line for 10 days (dont think I am complaining! because I aint.) should be reviewed and hopefully added soon  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/kevron.jpg

Regards
Tim
Perth, Australia


7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 1, posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks ago) and read 3365 times:

should be another week or two, at the current rate.
I think the verdict will be that the aircraft is at too great an angle to be accepted, but only Johan can tell for certain.



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineTim From Australia, joined Jun 2000, 705 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (13 years 2 months 3 weeks ago) and read 3353 times:

Ta for the comments mate! Im not to sure if it will make it or not myself.
Yep Im expecting another week or two.

Cheers
Tim


User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 3, posted (13 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3330 times:

Personally, I like it. Not that much into the standard sideview myself, but it is what many people seem to want for some reason.


I wish I were flying
User currently offlineTomH From United States of America, joined May 1999, 960 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (13 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3333 times:

Tim,

The Duke is my favorite piston executive type. They look like they are going fast while just parked on the ramp. I have never seen one with wingtip extensions like the one in your photo, and I think that complicates picture taking a bit. But that's not what throws me off about the picture.

My preferred shot of the Duke would have been with a prime lens (50mm or so) and it would have included the nose of the aircraft. I think you have to be careful when obstructing the nose of most aircraft with another part of the airframe, as you have.

Some will argue this point, but in most successful aircraft photos, the nose of the aircraft has been treated with respect. What I mean is that the photographer has tried not to let the outline of the nose be compromised by background distractions such as light poles, harsh, contrasty buildings, groups of people or parts of other aircraft. In your case, you eliminated the nose of the aircraft entirely, and this frustrates the viewer right away.

It is also important on twin Beeches, though not necessarily the Duke, to include some engine detail. In this way, if you had the prop spinners in the shot, the viewer could quickly determine if it is piston or turboprop-powered-and Beech has produced many of both.


One last comment. Ideally could be a bit higher in the frame. It is noticeably closer to the bottom (horizontal) margin of the frame, with the result being a disproportionate amount of clear sky. It's hard for me to complain about the latter, as that is a commodity we have seen little of where I live!

Hope my comments help.

TomH



User currently offlineTim From Australia, joined Jun 2000, 705 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (13 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3325 times:

Tom and jwenting,

I really appreciate your comments! I am very new to actually photgraphing aircraft and like to get better and better with the tips of other photographers!

Tom: Great looking aircraft aint it!? Especally with those 744 style winglets!  Smile/happy/getting dizzy

Cheers
Tim


User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 6, posted (13 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 3305 times:

I can only advise to create your own style, shoot what you like the way you like it.
Shooting shots you don't like just to get them accepted by someone else should only be done if the other guy is paying for it  Smile/happy/getting dizzy



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineRindt From Germany, joined May 2000, 930 posts, RR: 13
Reply 7, posted (13 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3293 times:

Jwenting, what you just said is probably the best thing I've heard from you... and it's very true.

Tim, the photo is properly exposed, but slightly blurry. I think if you had walked 8-10 feet to your right, you would have eliminated the problem Tom is referring to. (the nose)

-Rob



What other people think of you is none of your business!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Need Some Opinions On This Photo posted Sun Jun 25 2006 01:04:06 by AIRBUSRIDER
Opinions On This Photo posted Sat Dec 24 2005 18:36:12 by B076
Opinions On This Photo posted Fri Aug 12 2005 16:20:44 by B076
Opinions On This Photo... posted Sat Dec 14 2002 20:00:45 by EGGD
Opinions On This Photo... posted Tue Jun 4 2002 16:21:08 by Mirage
Opinions On This Photo posted Wed Jun 6 2001 12:47:57 by Tim
Opinions On This CF-18 Shot Please posted Sat Oct 21 2006 20:16:21 by LOCsta
Please Comment On This Photo. posted Tue Oct 17 2006 07:49:58 by Ferrypilot
Opinions On This Shot... posted Thu Oct 12 2006 06:27:59 by Longhornmaniac
Opinions On This Single-engine Shot posted Wed Oct 4 2006 19:10:41 by LOCsta