Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Slide Trading And Copyright?  
User currently offlineBlackened From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (14 years 11 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2462 times:

I've just been reading the other post about the upload rules here and a lot has been said about slide trading there.
One thing came to my mind: What about copyright when a slide is traded. I mean there some people here (Joe, Michael) that seem to sell their slides. How can you make sure you still own the copyright of the picture. You're still the photographer but how can you prove it? So someone could buy a slide taken by a pro somewhere, scan it and upload it here. Has this ever happened to anyone? What can you do then? Is it legal?

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineMikephotos From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2923 posts, RR: 52
Reply 1, posted (14 years 11 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 2420 times:

Yes, someone could do that but most people who trade seriously are honest people that wouldn't even consider pulling a stunt like that. While there is no guarantee, I feel very confident that the people, make that friends, I trade with can be trusted. I've been trading for several years and never had a problem.


User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 17
Reply 2, posted (14 years 11 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2408 times:

You must also consider the terms of the trade. Does a trade involve transferral of copyright? Selling photos for publication can do so (especially if you're a lowly amateur and the other guys a large publishing house that feels you should be honoured they even consider using your work).

I wish I were flying
User currently offlineCkw From UK - England, joined Aug 2010, 813 posts, RR: 12
Reply 3, posted (14 years 11 months 5 days ago) and read 2385 times:

As a point of information, under UK law copyright is retained by the photographer unless explicitly transferred to another party - doesn't matter who actually possesses the image, even if they paid for it.

But other countries may have different variations on this.



Colin K. Work, Pixstel
User currently offlineSkyliner From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 205 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (14 years 11 months 5 days ago) and read 2380 times:

Further to Colin's comment, U.S. law is essentially the same--copyright remains with the original photographer unless transferred, in writing, or for the specific exception of "work for hire", which covers employees (such as a news photographer) or other situations agreed to in advance by the buyer and photographer.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Masterclass: Slide Scanning And Further Processing posted Sun May 21 2006 14:49:58 by Beechcraft
Slide Film And Airport X-Ray Machines posted Wed Sep 24 2003 09:13:06 by UTA_flyinghigh
Miami Slide Show And Spotting Jan. 2003 posted Wed Jan 15 2003 18:32:11 by AAGOLD
Slide Show And Auction posted Thu Aug 2 2001 16:37:14 by Psa188
And Again A Copyright Violation. posted Sun Oct 30 2005 22:06:24 by Tommy Mogren
Negative And Slide Scanner posted Mon Jun 20 2005 21:03:25 by Singel09
Slide And Negative Film:Way Too Risky. posted Sat Jun 28 2003 01:09:16 by BO__einG
Best Slide And Print Scanner. posted Thu Nov 22 2001 07:17:59 by Alaskaairlines
The Battle Between Slide And Print Film: Who Wins? posted Sun Aug 27 2000 16:15:14 by Usairways@clt
Top Photographer Ranking By Photos And Views posted Thu Feb 15 2007 09:09:31 by Fly-K