Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Understanding The System (queue)  
User currently offlineAKE0404AR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2535 posts, RR: 45
Posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3090 times:

2005-01-21: 8 photos 8 photos left for Johan
2005-01-22: 1 photos 1 photos left for Johan
2005-01-23: 6 photos 6 photos left for Johan
2005-01-24: 2 photos 2 photos left for Johan
2005-01-25: 1 photos 1 photos left for Johan
2005-01-26: 3 photos 3 photos left for Johan
2005-01-27: 1 photos 1 photos left for Johan
2005-01-29: 2 photos 2 photos left for Johan
2005-01-30: 3 photos 3 photos left for Johan
2005-01-31: 1 photos 1 photos left for Johan
2005-02-01: 3 photos 3 photos left for Johan
2005-02-02: 3 photos 3 photos left for Johan
2005-02-03: 650 photos 560 photos not screened yet 90 photos currently in screening
2005-02-04: 1371 photos 1369 photos not screened yet 2 photos currently in screening
2005-02-05: 1786 photos 1756 photos not screened yet 30 photos currently in screening
2005-02-06: 2446 photos 2440 photos not screened yet 6 photos currently in screening
2005-02-07: 1352 photos 1352 photos not screened yet

Correct me if I am wrong: Does it mean that a total of 128 pictures out of over 7000 have been screened in the last 5 days? It is just a question, so please don't shoot me!!!!

VG.

16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAirplanepics From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2003, 2739 posts, RR: 40
Reply 1, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3027 times:

Vasco,

There has been much more than 128 pictures screened over the last few days. What you are seeing is that there are 650 photos that were uploaded from the 3rd that still have to be processed.

The other pictures that are in screening are pictures that have got priority for some reason or another.

Hope this helps,

Simon Nicholls



Simon - London-Aviation.com
User currently offlineJkw777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3028 times:

Hi Vasco,

That means that there are 128 "Currently in Screening". I'm assuming passed first screening or what ever.

Cheers,

Justin Big grin

Edit: Skippy beat me to it, ta!  Big grin

[Edited 2005-02-07 20:00:53]

User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2037 posts, RR: 32
Reply 3, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3020 times:

Vasco,

You have to think of photos submitted on those particular days. So in your example, the 2nd of Feb has been cleared of pictures submitted that day, with three left for Johan.

The 3rd of Feb however has 650 photos remaining that were submitted that day, 560 of them unscreened, leaving 90 actually pulled for screening.

What you don't see are the 'screened' figures, which would make it appear more logical. Once a photo is screened, it effectively vanishes from these figures.

The figure of 128 is the number of pictures in screening at the particular time you accessed the stats page.


Cheers


James


Edit: Beaten like a redheaded stepchild.

[Edited 2005-02-07 20:06:26]


It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlineAirplanepics From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2003, 2739 posts, RR: 40
Reply 4, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3005 times:

Ah, Im to quick  Big grin

Simon



Simon - London-Aviation.com
User currently offlineJkw777 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2991 times:

That's not something to be bragging about! The ladies won't like that...

Cheers,

Justin  Wink/being sarcastic


User currently offlineAirplanepics From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2003, 2739 posts, RR: 40
Reply 6, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2982 times:

Justin,

I'll give you that one  Big grin

Simon Nicholls



Simon - London-Aviation.com
User currently offlineAviopic From Netherlands, joined Mar 2004, 2681 posts, RR: 41
Reply 7, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2977 times:

So what happened the 5th ?
It is normal to see some priorities but 30  Confused
Got some nice uploads myself on that date, maybe it's better to pull them back............. learned from Wietse haha  Laugh out loud

Willem



The truth lives in one’s mind, it doesn’t really exist
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9668 posts, RR: 68
Reply 8, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2966 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Just to show you that a huge amount of pictures get screened each day, here are the top-10 stats for the last 7 days. The first number is how many pictures that individual screened. I have truncated the usernames for obvious reasons.


4986 35% 0% 65%
3293 20% 0% 80%
2081 42% 0% 58%
1462 20% 0% 80%
1361 35% 0% 65%
1177 58% 0% 42%
1010 28% 0% 72%
clickhappy 882 40% 0% 60%
767 38% 0% 62%
659 7% 0% 93%


User currently offlineINNflight From Switzerland, joined Apr 2004, 3767 posts, RR: 59
Reply 9, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2947 times:

Thanks for the insight Royal! Just to understand that, 2nd row is acceptances, 3rd left for johan and 4th rejections?

Thanks
Florian



Jet Visuals
User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2037 posts, RR: 32
Reply 10, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2935 times:

Wow, so over 70 percent rejected. That's very interesting, and more or less on the 1-in-4 figure quoted on the upload page.


James



It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9668 posts, RR: 68
Reply 11, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2922 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

3rd row is a stat that isn't used, it is always zero

User currently offlineMaiznblu_757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2002, 5112 posts, RR: 50
Reply 12, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2888 times:

There are a total of 7707 photos from 1184 photographers waiting to be processed on the upload page (34 waiting for Johan and 7673 waiting for the screeners).


That is very understandable.  Big thumbs up


User currently offlineAKE0404AR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 2535 posts, RR: 45
Reply 13, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2732 times:

Chad,

thanks for the smart a.. comment.

V.







User currently offlineFergulmcc From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, RR: 52
Reply 14, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2607 times:

If you happen to photograph an incident and would like it to get onto the DB quickly. How do you go about trying to get a photograph screened before others i.e. priority screening.

Fergul Big grin



Zambian Airways, Where the Eagles fly free!!
User currently offlineTZ From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2003, 1085 posts, RR: 52
Reply 15, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 2586 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Fergul: Send an email to screeners - @ - airliners.net. Make sure you include the registration of the aircraft (very important).

Tamsin (a.net screening crew)



TZ Aviation - Aeropuerto de los Banditos Team Images
User currently offlineFergulmcc From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, RR: 52
Reply 16, posted (9 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 2588 times:

Tasmin

Thanks, I don't know if its worth send the e-mail. Nothing actually happened as such, as far as damage is concerned, but a 737 entered the runway, 16/34, in Dublin while an Airbus was forced to abort is final and you could see how close it was as the Airbus retracted its landing gear just at the threshold of 16/34 while the 737 was forced to exit the runway. I'm not 100% sure of how or why it happened as I only got second hand info.

I just have two photos of the planes in question at their second attempt to land and take off.

Fergul

I know it been posted but what is the e-mail address for the screeners.

Thanks  Big thumbs up

Sorry I've just seen the address  Nuts

[Edited 2005-02-15 12:51:26]


Zambian Airways, Where the Eagles fly free!!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Is Being Done About The Slow Queue? posted Wed Jul 5 2006 19:30:21 by Navigator
Badinfo And The New Queue posted Sun Jun 19 2005 11:29:44 by DLKAPA
Understanding The New Rules And Is This Acceptable posted Wed Apr 27 2005 04:49:22 by DLKAPA
The Upload Queue posted Thu Dec 16 2004 20:44:51 by Psych
The Long Queue - The Facts posted Sun Aug 15 2004 19:34:41 by United4everDEN
An Idea For The Upload Queue? posted Fri Aug 13 2004 10:59:38 by Bruce
Incorrect Info On Photos In The Upload Queue posted Thu Jun 17 2004 18:26:10 by Skymonster
Why The Slow Queue Recently? posted Mon Jun 7 2004 08:24:49 by Andrewuber
The "Queue". posted Wed Jun 2 2004 18:14:54 by Txiki1uk
Sure Key That Your Photo Is Lost In The System posted Wed Mar 17 2004 01:26:34 by Maiznblu_757