Danpio From United States of America, joined May 2004, 131 posts, RR: 1 Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3334 times:
Great question. It's cool to see that you may be the only one that has uploaded a photo of a certain aircraft.
I have several, but it's because i've uploaded several small, local Cessna single engine types.
Sean377 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 1225 posts, RR: 45 Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3319 times:
I can't believe they are stopping production of the 757. It's (in my opinion) the best looking airliner ever, and your photo Tim, emphasises that point fantastically.
Sean
Flying is the second greatest thrill known to man... Landing is the first!
Vzlet From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 820 posts, RR: 0 Reply 4, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3315 times:
Many of my military and private shots are unique regs, so I won't list them all.
Ones that I'm surprised haven't been posted by anyone else include the An-124 prototype at the 1985 Paris Show:
SnowJ From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 207 posts, RR: 6 Reply 5, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3315 times:
Well, I have a couple of firsts...meaning that the photos I managed to get accepted were the first ones in the database. They are common TYPES, but the actual aircraft themselves--their tail numbers--are (were) new.
All four photos were firsts in the database tail-number wise, with the C-5 being still the only one of it's registration in the database. The F-15C was first, the second in the database was also mine. Not trying to brag, just happy and a little proud of them.
JetAv8r From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 284 posts, RR: 1 Reply 6, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3305 times:
I've got around 250 shots of unique N#'s (ones only I've shotten). It helps not shooting airliners and living 100 miles from the closest a.net photographer.
SnowJ From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 207 posts, RR: 6 Reply 7, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3301 times:
Um...yeah I suppose that makes a little difference.
GPHOTO From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 818 posts, RR: 27 Reply 8, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3285 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW DATABASE EDITOR
Actually, its not too difficult for general aviation types. It's not too rare to get the first shot of a military type either. Airliners however are much harder to get a unique entry of, so well done Sleekjet. I have a habit of going off the beaten track looking for hidden odd-balls such as these, which I enjoyed getting and uploading:
Mikephotos From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2923 posts, RR: 56 Reply 9, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3269 times:
Bronko From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 805 posts, RR: 12 Reply 17, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 3153 times:
Quoting IL76 (Reply 2): I guess people around Hamburg, Toulouse and Seattle will have many unique rego-shots with all the temporary Airbus & Boeing rego's...
Not really, at least in Boeings case. Boeing reuses their temporary registration numbers. For example, I have 12 different shots of N1786B, but all unique aircraft. Boeing test reg's are usually N1786B, N1787B, etc.
SnowJ From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 207 posts, RR: 6 Reply 22, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 2994 times:
Well, that is an impressive array of photos! I just feel the need to say well done to everyone!! All your photos are just outstanding, and if I were you--though I am ONE of you--I would be proud of those photos. Again everyone, well done and keep it up!!
28 Clickhappy: Even better would be a unique shot (airline, reg, type) that you managed to capture but no longer exists. I have such a photo, Lequios of Japan, went
29 Skymonster: Not only a unique registration, but a unique type - there appear to be no other pictures of an Ahrens 404 on the database! View Large View MediumPhoto
31 Gkirk: I've never seen such plugging in my life And Skymonster, as a photo screener you should know better All very nice pics though
32 Willo: I have a fairly easy task here as all of my pictures are of GA taken at small airfields. Of the 200 or so that I have in the database, 60 are still un
33 Malandan: I hadn't realised there were so many among my rather eclectic collection, probably due to the age of the picture and that many of them are light aircr