It was just easier for me that it was rejected for baddistance or badcentered.
I can,t see the badquality of the aircraft.
I thought for this distance the photo was made it was in a acceptable quality range,but hey who am I
Or is the problem that I like the photo that much I don,t see it anymore.
I know this photo was easier to make on a nice summer evening with the sun behind you.
Can I save this photo for A.net or is better to keep it for my personal database:D
UA777222 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3348 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 5382 times:
I think that there is all of the a/c and just a little bit of the tower lowering the overall quality of the picture. If you are able to back that shot up a bit and get a bit more tower/airport in and pass it off as an airport overview. Shots like these;
Mygind66 From Spain, joined May 2004, 1058 posts, RR: 11
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 5323 times:
I agree anyhow with Badquality terms. As you have said light isn't good enough although this 'silver look' produces a nice pic IMHO....
If it was because of the tower a Badmotiv call would be more accurate.
The TWR is focused but the a/c is out of focus or slightly blurred....
Psych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3069 posts, RR: 57
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 5274 times:
I really like the principle of your photo. Interestingly, when I opened it with my browser it appeared on the screen as more closely cropped and I felt that that improved the shot - slightly closer in on the tower and cutting out some of that sky above the top of the 747.
I would agree with Enrique, though, that it does suffer a bit with depth of field problems - the tower is noticably sharper than the aircraft.
But good luck with your next attempt at this - I certainly like the motive and somehow there is a real dynamic quality to the shot, for me.
IL76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2239 posts, RR: 46
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 month 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 5254 times:
I think with the right lighting conditions it could be nice, but this shot is too grey and bland because it's backlit.
The sheer distance makes this a shot a nasty one to edit as it quickly turns grainy. But it can be done: