Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Can This Be Salvaged Or Binned?  
User currently offlineIL76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2239 posts, RR: 48
Posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2686 times:

Hi guys,
Been trying to edit this shot numerous times, because I like it so much, but without success. The rejection reason was badquality/badblurry. The plane is distorted because of its own jet exhaust, but the picture is not unsharp I think, f.e. the runwaylights look ok to me.
Is the engine heat a not-to-overcome hurdle, or are there perhaps other issues that can (hopefully) be solved to make this shot stand a chance at A.net?
Thanks,
Eduard

[Edited 2005-03-15 10:35:06]

16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePH-OTO From Netherlands, joined Mar 2002, 434 posts, RR: 31
Reply 1, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2663 times:

Ed,

What's with the blur around the sun? That can't be from the exhaust IMO. Look's like a compression effect to me. Nice shot BTW.
Try less sharpening around the contours of the plane and it would look better IMO.

I had the same problem with my 747 taking of from RTM. These shots are very hard to get right. The exhaust blur looks jagged very quickly when sharpened some way or another.


Martin



Look very closely between the lines of this message, and you will see the captain beating up the jumpseater
User currently offlineTimdegroot From Netherlands, joined Apr 2002, 3674 posts, RR: 64
Reply 2, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2642 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

It's a nice shot Ed, but one for the perosnal files I'm afraid. Too much engine exhaust/blur.

Tim



Alderman Exit
User currently offlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3064 posts, RR: 58
Reply 3, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2640 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

A beautiful photo Eduard. It is such a shame that the situation was going to prevent you getting the clarity of image demanded by the site.

If I were a site screener I know I would have to reject it, as the quality of the image of the aircraft itself is just not there. Having looked closely I cannot imagine how you can rescue that aspect of the photo. But it's a lovely image, nonetheless. Some of my favourite shots on the site include this kind of atmosphere that you have captured. My sympathies. However, I would be very pleased to have a photo such as this in my personal collection.

All the best.

Paul


User currently offlineIL76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2239 posts, RR: 48
Reply 4, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2634 times:

Thanks guys... I was hoping for a miracle I guess.
&*^$% exhaust...  Smile
Cheers...
Ed


User currently offlinePH-OTO From Netherlands, joined Mar 2002, 434 posts, RR: 31
Reply 5, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2615 times:

Quoting IL76 (Reply 4):
Thanks guys... I was hoping for a miracle I guess.

Ed, posting a picture doesn't improve picture quality  laughing 
Ooh, found out that I am exactly three A.net years old today (see my profile)
 old 
Martin



Look very closely between the lines of this message, and you will see the captain beating up the jumpseater
User currently offlineIL76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2239 posts, RR: 48
Reply 6, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 2598 times:

Congrats Martin!  praise 
(can't remember when my 1st shot was added, there were no statistics back then.  Sad)

Quoting PH-OTO (Reply 5):
Ed, posting a picture doesn't improve picture quality

ehh... No, but perhaps someone could have a fantastic editing trick that could have made a difference... crossfingers  But hey, we all know: crap in = crap out. I'll try to see how it looks on print, and otherwise it'll get a nice corner of the harddrive to rest its days... zzz 

Mzl,
Ed


User currently offlineAviopic From Netherlands, joined Mar 2004, 2681 posts, RR: 41
Reply 7, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2558 times:

Magnificent Eduard but if you want somebody else to try you better post the original.
Although i am afraid the result won't be enough for A.net it is to good for the bin, a nice A3 print will do very good !

Willem



The truth lives in one’s mind, it doesn’t really exist
User currently offlineBobster2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2551 times:

Wow! That's the best rejected picture I've seen. I know it had to be rejected, but I bet the screeners looked at it a long time. It should make a fantastic print.

User currently offlineDiezel From Netherlands, joined Oct 2002, 646 posts, RR: 11
Reply 9, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2524 times:

That is a great picture Ed! It is something for the cover of one of those big coffeetable photobooks:

"AMS, The Brantjes Way".

Well done and don't worry, it is good just the way it is.

Roel.



Never be afraid of what you like. (Miles Davis)
User currently offlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3064 posts, RR: 58
Reply 10, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2515 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I've just had another look at this photo - really atmospheric. With a photo like this I can understand why some members propose an 'artistic' category.

Out of interest, Eduard, what are the details for this photo - you've obviously frozen the plane well, so what was the ISO etc? I love the way the sun is so clearly still up, yet it looks like night time.

Paul


User currently offlineIL76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2239 posts, RR: 48
Reply 11, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2508 times:

There was a massive fog that morning, so that's why the sun is so weak. Every plane that passed blew away some of the fog, dissapearing in the mist a few seconds later. There was very little contrast to begin with. Everything looked grey and the histogram basically was a tall spike in the middle.
To give you an idea of the unedited original:

I had to crank up the "shadows"-slider in the RAW converter to get any contrast.
Exif... Lemme check...
1/200s f7.1 400mm 200ISO.

Cheers,
Eduard


User currently offlineBobster2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2492 times:

Quoting IL76 (Reply 11):
Everything looked grey and the histogram basically was a tall spike in the middle.

I have pictures like that too. The fog/mist/rain in the air erases all the color and contrast. You can't really put them back after they're gone. Increasing the contrast gives you a grainy and posterized image, and the color information is still gone. Low contrast pictures can look very nice, sort of abstract and moody, but a.net doesn't seem to go for that kind of picture.


User currently offlineAA777 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 2544 posts, RR: 28
Reply 13, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2479 times:

You know that really is a beautiful picture. And I dont think it's meant to have so much contrast.. that is what the image WAS. Why should it be rejected because you cant see every detail of the A/C? This picture is not meant to show that...it shows an a/c in the fog, with the sun and runway lights....its a gorgeous shot, and A.net is at a loss IMHO if they dont accept it....

best of luck,

-AA777


User currently offlineJavibi From Spain, joined Oct 2004, 1371 posts, RR: 41
Reply 14, posted (9 years 9 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 2415 times:

I just hate you Eduard, for making all my pictures look like crap... Fantastic shot!!!!!

If it was my shot I think I'd try not to crank up the contrast so much, as AA777 suggests.

I wish for an Artistic category as well, funny Johan does not give in to this, as most of the shots in Editor's choice could fall into that one....

Regards and thanks for sharing!

j



"Be prepared to engage in constructive debate". Are YOU prepared?
User currently offlineYULtoPEI From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 218 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2342 times:

Really nice shot Eduard... hypnotized  thank's to share...

I understand the point to have an artistic category.
Sorry if I repeat but I think is important that they know A.net NEED a artistic category.

 wideeyed 

YULtoPEI



PEI in Colombia!!!. [Canon T2i]
User currently offlineLHSebi From Germany, joined Jan 2004, 1049 posts, RR: 8
Reply 16, posted (9 years 9 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2334 times:

Eduard,
Absolutely beautiful! You have any more of that morning to share? I have hoped for conditions like that forever!

Keep it up!

Sebastian



I guess that's what happens in the end, you start thinking about the beginning.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Can This Be Saved? posted Sun Oct 22 2006 12:22:26 by Cosec59
How Can This Be Improved? posted Sat Sep 16 2006 00:34:52 by Flamedude707
Quality Rejection... Can It Be Saved Or Not? posted Thu Jul 20 2006 00:33:30 by Walter2222
Can This Be Priority? posted Mon Jul 17 2006 09:21:24 by OD720
How Can This Be Bad Distance? posted Sat Apr 15 2006 00:23:02 by PilotNTrng
Can This Be Saved? posted Wed Mar 15 2006 00:42:08 by Walter2222
Can This Be Improved? posted Wed Feb 1 2006 09:12:26 by Eadster
Can This Be Improved? Help Requested posted Mon Jan 9 2006 09:29:04 by Walter2222
Can This Be Saved? posted Sat Nov 19 2005 20:06:11 by BmiBaby737
Can This Be Saved? posted Tue Sep 27 2005 17:24:33 by SEAchaz