Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Would This Be Rejected For Bad Personal.?  
User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2464 posts, RR: 44
Posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 4121 times:

I don't want to waste screeners time as i only load what i think has a chance.
But im not sure if i should try with this shot .
Any advice would be appreciated .



On a wing and a prayer
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineQ330 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1460 posts, RR: 21
Reply 1, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 4106 times:

Quoting JumboJim747 (Thread starter):
Would This Be Rejected For Bad Personal.?

Only if the screener decides to write you a personal message. Wink If you mean badpeople, I really can't tell because the photo is so small. Looking at that crop though, I think it could get baddistance.

-Q



Long live the A330!
User currently offlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3048 posts, RR: 58
Reply 2, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 4083 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi Alan,

I can't see what the problem would be from a bad personal point of view. Were you thinking it may be an issue being able to see a private pilot?

I would agree with Q that a tighter crop may be advantageous.

Enjoy the weekend.

All the best.

Paul


User currently offlineTZ From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2003, 1085 posts, RR: 53
Reply 3, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 4050 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

As the others have already said, badpersonal is a special rejection criteria which allows us to write a personal-message to the photographer. Its purpose is to allow us to explain a rejection to a photographer if something is not obvious - an example would be "Please list airport according to standards" or "CMOS dust above wing".

badpeople is highly unlikely to be the rejection reason here - the flight crew and passengers are not reasons for a badpeople rejection if they are going about their normal business while flying the aircraft, if observed from the outside and not dominant in the photograph. An image like yours would not be badpeople.

It does need a tighter crop, and may perhaps be slightly blurry, but without seeing the full-size version it's hard to say. Certainly looks quite nice in other regards.

Tamsin (a.net screening crew)



TZ Aviation - Aeropuerto de los Banditos Team Images
User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2464 posts, RR: 44
Reply 4, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 4035 times:

First of all thanks for the quick replies guys
Q330 , Psych, tamsin.
Second i got my wires crossed here because i was referring to the peoples faces in the chopper being seen now i know its called bad people not bad personal.
Thanks guys for clearing it up

Quoting Psych (Reply 2):
I would agree with Q that a tighter crop may be advantageous



Quoting Q330 (Reply 1):
If you mean badpeople, I really can't tell because the photo is so small.

If you think it has a chance i will try another crop and see what happens thanks psych.and Q330

Quoting Tamsin (Reply 3):
It does need a tighter crop, and may perhaps be slightly blurry, but without seeing the full-size version it's hard to say. Certainly looks quite nice in other regards.

Tamsin here is the link to the full size pic if you also think it may have a chance i will recrop and try with it thanks again guys for all the help.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v337/alan747/helicopterridejpg.jpg



On a wing and a prayer
User currently offlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3048 posts, RR: 58
Reply 5, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 3979 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Something looks wrong there Alan. I followed that link you posted, but the photo looks the same size as the one here.

Anyway, as we now know the people are not a problem, I think a tight crop will make it look better, assuming you have the quality. Is the photo already edited? For me the one thing to watch out for on the basis of what I can see would be the tail, which looks like it may need to be sharper.

Good luck with it.

Paul


User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2464 posts, RR: 44
Reply 6, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 3911 times:

Paul
That is the maximum size photobucket will let me upload
Im not sure if there is another way to do it.
Anyway ill see what happens and thank you and everyone else for the help



On a wing and a prayer
User currently offlineLeanOfPeak From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 509 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3892 times:

What are the dimensions of the original image?

User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2464 posts, RR: 44
Reply 8, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3888 times:

LeanOfPeak
3054x2336 thats the uncropped size



On a wing and a prayer
User currently offlineLeanOfPeak From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 509 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3853 times:

Then, assuming the quality is there (It's difficult to tell from the smaller image), I see no trouble whatsoever with an acceptable 1024x*** full-frame crop.

User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2464 posts, RR: 44
Reply 10, posted (9 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3831 times:

I've done it to 1024 and have submitted it see how i go.
Thank you once again for your assistance and everyone else cheers



On a wing and a prayer
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Would This Be Rejected For Motive? posted Thu Sep 21 2006 20:47:41 by San747
Will This Be Rejected For Bad Motive? posted Sun Nov 14 2004 13:43:12 by Dahlgardo
Would This Be Considered A "bad" Double? posted Tue May 23 2006 05:22:02 by Je89_w
Rejected For 'Bad Personal'? posted Tue Apr 19 2005 16:18:46 by United_Fan
Would There Be Interest For A Shot Like This posted Mon Aug 21 2006 07:03:22 by JumboJim747
Would This Be "bad Motive"? posted Fri May 19 2006 19:15:32 by AIRBUSRIDER
Would This Be Bad Double posted Wed Apr 26 2006 11:28:15 by CallMeCapt
Should This Really Be Rejected For Baddark? posted Sat Dec 18 2004 21:35:08 by KC7MMI
Would This Be Acceptable? posted Sun Oct 15 2006 23:24:42 by Walter2222
Accident Pic Rejected For "personal" posted Wed Sep 20 2006 23:44:05 by EZYAirbus