Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
So, Which Photo Is "right"?  
User currently offlineOly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6734 posts, RR: 11
Posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 3667 times:

2 photos taken at more or less the same time (2nd May 2004) at MAN, but with different outcomes, exposure wise.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © James Rowson

Too dark?


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Danny Hill - AirlinesOnPrint

Too pale? Though it was a misty morning.


wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9633 posts, RR: 68
Reply 1, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 3641 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

I don't think either is right, although I wasn't there, so I can't be 100% certain.

To me the top shot looks like it has had Auto Levels applied, the second one no Levels at all. I think the 'correct' shot would be somewhere in between.

Both are nice shots. Good angle and well composed.

Nice result Big grin


User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 3624 times:

Don't give up hope for these shots yet. Add a little bit of contrast to the second shot by using a brightness/contrast layer and get it to where it looks a bit less "misty" and send it in. This shot looks like it has some real good potential.

User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4163 posts, RR: 54
Reply 3, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 3615 times:

Quoting DLKAPA (Reply 2):
Add a little bit of contrast to the second shot by using a brightness/contrast layer and get it to where it looks a bit less "misty" and send it in.

Good morning.  Big grin No need to send them in cause both shots are already in the database.



-
User currently offlineGranite From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5568 posts, RR: 63
Reply 4, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3596 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi all

So what's the point here?

Two different shots from two different photographers and possibly two different cameras.

Andrew, do you have one to upload? We would like to see it.

Regards

Gary


User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2035 posts, RR: 32
Reply 5, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3589 times:

Not sure what the point of the post is, but it can be an interesting exercise, and one of the fun things about DSLR processing. Different photographers will usually get different results from their workflow.

The exception is when the conditions are so favourable that the camera achieves an ideal capture, and all that's left to do is crop and sharpen.

Personally, these sunny but slightly muggy days have really tested my post-processing ability, but it certainly makes it rewarding when you succesfully recreate what you saw through the viewfinder.

Cheers

James


Edit: To answer the question, as Royal said, I think it's down to the levels. Different white & black points have been chosen, or simply a different interpretation with the curve tool.

[Edited 2005-03-31 21:15:08]


It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3582 times:

Quoting PUnmuth@VIE (Reply 3):
No need to send them in cause both shots are already in the database.

ok wow, I completely missed the point of that one...


User currently offlineApuneger From Belgium, joined Sep 2000, 3032 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3528 times:

Personally I like the first one more. The second photo is just way too bright in the dark areas and I think it takes away a lot of the 'depth' in the composition, certainly when comparing to the other one.

Maybe some might think that the first one is a bit too dark, but for me it has the best contrast of the two photos, by far. No offence to the photographer of the second photo of course.

Greets,
Ivan



Ivan Coninx - Brussels Aviation Photography
User currently offlineJRowson From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 352 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3510 times:

Good evening all,

The 1st photo was taken by myself in the days when i was using a 300D. To me the photo looks right, or I wouldn't have uploaded it. A number of different variables come into play though to cause the differences. Firstly Danny uses a different camera to me (10D I think?). Secondly, beacause the 300D has a tendency to blow out highlights, I was most likely under-exposing by 1/3, despite it being misty. I don't use auto levels to process. I would have used photoshop's level adjustment using the histogram. Monitor setup could cause the differences to.
I perceive my image to be right, as it looks right to me. I can't see how there is a definative answer to what is right. If it wasn't right it wouldn't be on Anet  Smile.
Thanks for plugging the shot anyway, it's much appreciated  Wink.

James.



James Rowson. Canonite and lover of all things L. JAR Photography.
User currently offlineJumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2464 posts, RR: 44
Reply 9, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3484 times:

Quoting DLKAPA (Reply 6):
ok wow, I completely missed the point of that one

Eric your not the only one .
Had us all going for a while .
I had both pictures open and was having a close look at which would look better when i realized they are already in the DB.



On a wing and a prayer
User currently offlineOly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6734 posts, RR: 11
Reply 10, posted (9 years 5 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 3421 times:

OK, having left this to stew for a few hours, my question was really about how much a photo could have been adjusted or how much it can be adjusted (levels/contrast/brightness, etc, etc). What the eye sees and what the camera records are different and everyone has a different idea of what looks right. Do people try and reproduce the conditions (weather/light) on the day when postprocessing or try and get the plane looking its best?

Maybe I should have said that the photos were already in the DB, but I presumed that the layout would give this away.

Incidentally, it was interesting looking at the AP-BGL photos and just about all of them were at MAN with occasional others at LHR, JFK, Toronto and IAH.



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Which Photo Is Better Of The Two? posted Thu Apr 11 2002 23:42:31 by Sydneybuses
Pictures Ever Accepted "as Is"? posted Thu Nov 24 2005 10:44:11 by Andz
What Is "bad Cropping"? posted Mon Sep 12 2005 11:15:08 by LIPH
Just How Close Is "too Close"? posted Sat Jan 1 2005 09:08:14 by Bell407
How Small Is "Too Small"? posted Sat Jun 12 2004 16:58:07 by Olympus69
What About A New Photo Category: "Artistic" posted Mon Apr 19 2004 23:03:28 by Diezel
Who Says The Digi Rebel Is "Soft" posted Tue Dec 16 2003 07:16:35 by Maiznblu_757
Help With "Photo Scanners" Please posted Tue Dec 9 2003 01:51:36 by MartinairYYZ
Which Livery Is Hardest To Photo/ Process? posted Mon Aug 11 2003 19:53:53 by JFKTOWERFAN
Another "Photo Request" Question! posted Sat Mar 8 2003 23:23:40 by Wietse