Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
I'm New At This  
User currently offlineRoadrunner165 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 882 posts, RR: 8
Posted (14 years 5 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2323 times:

I realy want to get into airplane photography, But I don't know what type of camera to buy, If you could tell me everything I need for a beginner and the average price. "Including" camera, lens ect.


9 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineCYKA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (14 years 5 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 2280 times:

Scroll down, there was a thread recently called "Small Budged Camera", there's plenty of information there.

User currently offlineClassic707 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 548 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (14 years 5 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2270 times:

I would go with a Canon EOS Rebel 2000. Get a 28-80mm lens, 100-300mm lenes, and a nice camera bag. That would be a nice kit to start with. It is not too expensive ($350-$400 US) and you can expand on it later. Thats just my $00.02

User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 17
Reply 3, posted (14 years 5 months 6 days ago) and read 2246 times:

Another good option is the Nikon F65 (N65 on the other side of the pond), with Sigma 28-80 and 100-300 lenses. Should cost about the same.
A good bag is important. It will save your equipment from destruction on a more or less regular basis (as well as protect your back and neck from permanent damage once the equipment grows).

I wish I were flying
User currently offlineRoadrunner165 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 882 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (14 years 5 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 2236 times:

What type of film do I need to use???


User currently offlineMirage From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3125 posts, RR: 13
Reply 5, posted (14 years 5 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 2233 times:

Start with print film, 100 ASA or 200 ASA for cloudy days. Later in a few monthes you can try Fuji Reala 100 ASA and notice a great improvement in quality. Reala is expensive but maybe the best for prints.


User currently offlineCYKA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (14 years 5 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 2224 times:

I will have to agree with Mirage, use Fuji Reala....you will be amazed.

User currently offlineHawaiian717 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3236 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (14 years 5 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2209 times:

I was recently at the Minolta service center in Cypress, California and noticed that they sell refurbished cameras there. Refurbished/used cameras are a good way to save money.

I agree with the others, start with prints. Kodak Gold 100 is cheap but good enough, at least until you get the hang of shooting photos. Then move on to Fuji Reala 100 which is a great print film, and is actually pretty cheap if you get it from the right place. I get mine from http://www.bhphotovideo.com.

If you want to put your photos on airliners.net, you will need some sort of scanner. For best results, you will want one that can scan negatives.

David / SAN

User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (14 years 5 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2208 times:

I agree with David. A Used camera is the best way to go, if you have a place near you that has a good selection. SLRs with built-in motor drives, autofocus, etc have been common for over a decade, and can be found on the second-hand market.

Stay with the big names - Canon, Nikon, Minolta. There are tons of accessories and lenses for these from various manufacturers, and this will make sure that you can upgrade little by little as you find the funds - a new lens here and there, a new body...

You will need two zoom lenses. One in the 35-80mm range and another in the 80-200 range. If you can get higher than 200mm, great, but if not, usually you can get away with it (depending on the airport). But 200mm is a minimum.

Finally you need to decide whether you will shoot prints or slides. Prints are very forgiving, but getting a good scan off of a print is difficult unless you have a very good scanner. Depending on where you live, prints can be expensive choice as well - you need a fairly large print to be able to scan with good detail, and getting big prints every time will start to cost you. The advantage of prints is that flatbed scanners are pretty cheap.

Shooting slides is the other option. Slide scanners are more expensive, but, depending on where you live, slides are usually much less expensive than prints, and you make the money back in the long run (I figure that I save something like $15 per roll of slide film vs. prints). Slides generally result in much brighter and truer colors, but are unforgiving of error. Best to start with prints and go on to slides when you get the hang of it.

Finally, and it is what most people forget, is the scanner. People often concentrate on getting the camera, and blow their whole budget on it, shoot a few rolls, and then realize that the have nothing to scan them with, and their budget is gone. So don't forget to budget of a scanner.


User currently offlineCYKA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (14 years 5 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 2205 times:

Cfalk forgot to mention that film scanners which are used to scan slides can also scan negetives. Results are(im my opinion) just as good plus you dont need a projector to view your work for personal pleasure since you can always get prints from your negatives.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
I'm New At This posted Mon Jun 25 2001 01:06:18 by Roadrunner165
What Is A Spotting Area?(I Am New At This) posted Wed Jun 14 2000 16:41:23 by USAir_757
I Am Speechless....take A Look At This Shot... posted Tue Sep 19 2006 16:34:47 by Eksath
Look At This! Flaming Engine! posted Tue Nov 22 2005 23:26:42 by Tappan
Lots Of Pics At This Site... Illegally? posted Fri Oct 28 2005 19:28:51 by AJO
Pictures From Airliners.net At This Site. posted Wed Aug 17 2005 23:12:08 by Nlspot2004
No Zoom Lens, No Digital, But Look At This Photo! posted Mon Aug 18 2003 22:49:33 by RayPettit
Look At This Old Picture That I Found posted Sun Dec 15 2002 05:50:32 by Sushka
Please Have A Look At This posted Tue Nov 26 2002 22:32:01 by Clickhappy
Geesh- Look At This! 14MP! posted Tue Sep 24 2002 03:57:03 by Planedoctor