JFKTOWERFAN From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1100 posts, RR: 17 Reply 1, posted (8 years 1 month 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1897 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW DATABASE EDITOR
You have that fence there in the foreground. These shots are getting accepted less and less.
(edit) Not just the fence, its really all that distracting clutter.
Corey
DLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 3, posted (8 years 1 month 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1883 times:
I'm gonna go with the fence, combined with that other nose in the background. One of these by itself might not have been enough to reject, but with them both together it becomes really distracting.
StealthZ From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5431 posts, RR: 49 Reply 4, posted (8 years 1 month 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1877 times:
Quoting JFKTOWERFAN (Reply 1): You have that fence there in the foreground. These shots are getting accepted less and less.
And that reality is on a collision course with the fact that there are more and more fences all the time!
I would understand if the fence obstructed the plane .. but it doesn't
Maybe some thought should be given to that!
Regards
Chris
If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
Fergulmcc From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, RR: 54 Reply 9, posted (8 years 1 month 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1843 times:
Quoting APFPilot1985 (Reply 8): how ever in the first post I really dont see why that counts at all
I have seen less fence get bad motive, the first post, the fence is in the foreground, take it or leave it. (I'm not being sarcastic here either, That's the way it is, a.net don't like anything that takes away from the photo, fences included)
Thowman From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2004, 359 posts, RR: 3 Reply 10, posted (8 years 1 month 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 1828 times:
Hi Glenn
Of course, I know the spot - having spent many hours in the same place with Alfonso - and it is nearly impossible to get shots from there without having some fence in the shot.
And the last 2 even more fence than the average picture.
The last 4 shots were added in the last month - so they are recent. So, I am not sure that it is in fact the fence that gives you bad motive. Perhaps asking the screener would shed more light on to the subject?
DC10Tim From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 1405 posts, RR: 16 Reply 11, posted (8 years 1 month 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1803 times:
I wonder where the line is drawn here?
Clearly at some airports you are far more likely to get the fence in the way than at others. At an airport where there is a known 'fence problem', is it then more acceptable?
JumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2462 posts, RR: 50 Reply 12, posted (8 years 1 month 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1742 times:
Quoting Manzoori (Reply 8): 3. Cropped wing tip and tailplane
I believe this is the reason it got rejected and not the fence .
I just got a shot excepted and the fence is in full view .
Good luck with your future uploads EZYairbus
Sulman From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 2028 posts, RR: 35 Reply 13, posted (8 years 1 month 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1729 times:
You can have objects in the foreground like signs, sticks, aerials, traffic cones, fencing etc. If a.net didn't allow them, it would only encourage people to start removing them.
I think as long as they're 'part of the scene' and not an awkward distraction - a subjective distincion, I know - then it's okay. This is what some airports look like for us, no way around that.
Glenn, it may have helped if the aircraft was framed a little wider in this instance. It doesn't quite 'look' right as it is. I know how hard the 346 is close up.
Sponsor Message: 
From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2003, 2448 posts, 
From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1100 posts, 
From Spain, joined Jan 2005, 367 posts, 
From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5431 posts, 
From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, 
From UK - England, joined Sep 2002, 1516 posts, 
From Malta, joined Dec 2004, 1122 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
