A346Dude From Canada, joined Nov 2004, 1328 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2823 times:
Neat idea and cool result.
I would think the badmotiv is because the landing gear is not seperate from the building in the background. As for the badquality, it is harder to pinpoint, but it seems that in the brighter area of the plane (right around where the sun is) just isn't quite "right". Unfortunately, I would guess the landing gear issue would prevent it from being accepted.
Try it again though, I think this type of shot has some potential.
You know the gear is up and locked when it takes full throttle to taxi to the terminal.
LHSebi From Germany, joined Jan 2004, 1049 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 week 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2825 times:
Nice shot! However, I agree with badmotiv: You can not really immediately distinguish the bottom of the aircraft from the houses (if you understand what I mean). If you could have made that shot while the plane was higher up in the sky, you would have had more of a chance, I think.
As for the badquality, it looks like you have a lens flare. I think if you would have bumped up the aperture a bit, it could have worked.
I guess that's what happens in the end, you start thinking about the beginning.