Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Military DBs  
User currently offlineSenorcarnival From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1376 times:

I was spotting at KAUS earlier this afternoon and saw three military aircrafts. Does anyone know where I can look up their tail numbers? I've gone through many a sites with no success. Thanks!

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 1, posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1369 times:

http://www.scramble.nl/milbase.htm

Good Luck!

Wietse



Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineSenorcarnival From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1361 times:

Thanks Wietse, I haven't found what I'm looking for yet, but it's definitely a huge help!

User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 3, posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1356 times:

What exactly are you looking for? Or you mean that you didnt find the tailnumber you were looking for?


Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineSenorcarnival From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1355 times:

I didn't find the tailnumber. Actually, none of the formats on that DB match what I saw. I saw an "XL (1) 844" (couldn't exactly tell due to heat haze) on the tail and it clearly says U.S. Air Force on it, but all the formats on that DB show it as a CC or OH format for USAF jets.

User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 5, posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1350 times:

The CC or OH are just examples. According to the database, all XL coded aircraft are T-6 prop trainers. Can you show the photo to us?


Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineSenorcarnival From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks ago) and read 1343 times:

Here's the link to the first one, in case you get the red x of death:
http://www.pbase.com/image/42671127
http://jiki.pbase.com/u17/senorcarnival/upload/42671127.usaf1.jpg
The second set took off in pairs:
http://www.pbase.com/image/42671186
http://jiki.pbase.com/u17/senorcarnival/upload/42671186.usaf3.jpg


User currently offlineLY744 From Canada, joined Feb 2001, 5536 posts, RR: 10
Reply 7, posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks ago) and read 1337 times:

USAF tail numbers actually come in the format xx-yyyy where xx is the last two digits of the year of procurement (to keep it simple), and yyyy is a number (It is most often 0yyy but that is not a guarantee). Problem is, nobody ever puts the entire number in that format in any useful locations on the aircraft. For ACC aircraft, it is most often the last 3 digits displayed prominently on the tail preceded by a smaller 'AF' and the year 'xx'. That is the case with the T-38's in your pictures. What you would do is go to http://home.att.net/~jbaugher/usafserials.html (appears to be down as I type), figure out what years you could be looking at (unless you can see by magnifying the pictures), and look for T-38's that end in the 3 digits. It is possible but unlikely that there would be more than one possibility. The two large letters on the tail are typically indicators of the wing/base the aircraft is assigned to.


LY744.



Pacifism only works if EVERYBODY practices it
User currently offlineLeanOfPeak From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 509 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1327 times:

The tail of the first one definitely says -844. According to http://www.aero-web.org/specs/northrop/t-38a.htm , the only T-38's that end in -844 are 61-0844 and 67-14844. According to scramble, 61-0844 is no longer active, and 67-14844 is active, with an XL tailcode. My money's on that one being 67-14844.

Second photo, left:
-750 appears to yield only 62-3750. Scramble lists that with an RA tailcode, but Scramble may just not yet be aware of a relocation of that aircraft. In the absence of another known serial ending in -750 (You're free to look yourself), 62-3750 is my guess.

Second photo, right:
Having an A2, I know it shoots higher-res than that. In the original, can you clearly tell what the middle digit is? -8*8 leaves a lot of possibilities. Or is that a full-res crop of the original?


User currently offlineSenorcarnival From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1321 times:

Quoting LeanOfPeak (Reply 8):
Having an A2,

Oh so you're the other one... Big grin
How higher res (without going into TIFF or RAW) can you get than 3264 and Extra Fine though? Would it make any noticeable difference if I shot in 3264 3:2?

Quoting LeanOfPeak (Reply 8):
Or is that a full-res crop of the original?

Yes.

After examining the original, that other one is either 818 or 808, or the least likely, 8118. Email me if you want to take a look at the original.


User currently offlineLeanOfPeak From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 509 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1315 times:

If it's a full-res crop, I don't think the original will do much good. I just didn't know it was a full-res crop. That zoom does run out a little early, doesn't it... 

If you were shooting 3264, there is no higher res. 3264 3:2 is essentially like letterboxing on your TV to show a 16:9 format movie. It just throws away pixels at the top and bottom so that the image is in an SLR aspect ratio.

I shoot RAW, but I don't think it would have helped much in this case. The heat haze is just too much. The A2, like every other digital camera I've ever used, does too much in-camera sharpening for my taste in JPG mode on default settings, and you might try rolling the sharpening back a little and seeing how you like it if you don't want to shoot RAW. That said, it's the heat haze that's obscuring that middle digit, and most of what I don't like about the shots is the heat haze.

As for the identification of the third plane, the only -808 T-38 listed is denoted as withdrawn from use by Scramble. The only -818 is listed as stored. 67-14838, 67-14848, and 67-14858 are possibilities.

[Edited 2005-04-28 08:27:54]

User currently offlineSenorcarnival From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1310 times:

I shot those in hard sharpening. That's probably why you got that impression of the oversharpening. The A2 produces extremely soft pictures, IMHO. I used a teleconverter on those shots, btw, b/c that 200mm zoom would run out REALLY soon..

User currently offlineLurch From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1270 times:

The Tail codes you are looking at denote the Airbase that the machines are based at and are changed when a machine moves to a different base.

The Numbers are on the machine for ever!


User currently offlineLurch From United States of America, joined Jul 2008, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (9 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1268 times:

This link explains how they work!

http://www.globemaster.de/tailcodes.html


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Military Info Help Needed posted Mon Sep 4 2006 06:03:50 by Olympus69
US Military Designations posted Sat Aug 26 2006 03:26:45 by Ptrjong
Help With Military Reg. Please. posted Sun Nov 13 2005 00:08:49 by Fiveholer
Shooting Fast Military Stuff. posted Tue Jul 26 2005 16:54:36 by Xenon
What Categories For Old Military Aircraft. posted Tue Jul 12 2005 19:21:27 by Embraer145
Military DBs posted Thu Apr 28 2005 03:29:06 by Senorcarnival
Military Badpeople? posted Wed Mar 16 2005 15:47:53 by Ghostbase
Help With A Military Reg. posted Fri Feb 18 2005 03:39:28 by Fiveholer
Military Nose Art - Is It Welcome? posted Sun Nov 28 2004 16:46:49 by Ghostbase
Military Reg. Help posted Sun Oct 3 2004 23:31:48 by RG828