Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Reality Vs. Perfectionism  
User currently offlineCliffie From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 6 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1046 times:

Recently I had the opportunity to try my luck at Faro Airport in Portugal (thanks to Luis for the spotting guide btw!).

I only sent 4 pics of the bunch of 200 to A.net - and to my surprise, even the 4th got accepted w/out warning:


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Ingo Richardt



Am I just a lucky dog or is there something in the blur?

Regards
Ingo Richardt





7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineN737MC From Canada, joined Oct 2000, 678 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (13 years 6 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 949 times:

#1 Great shot. I like that angle. #2. I think it is blury only because of the daytime heating there in Faro. That happens sometimes in some U.S. Cities as well.

#3 I think it got accepted because it was a nice shot besides the blur and its a great angle for the picture. Overall it looks neat!

Regards,

Aaron Mandolesi
Denver, Colorado


User currently offlineMirage From Portugal, joined May 1999, 3125 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (13 years 6 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 931 times:

Hi Ingo,

I hope you have enjoyed your trip here. In late May the temperatures were extremly high for the season, now it's not so hot.

I like the photo, the blur was caused because of the very high temperatures on the runway and the use of 400mm I guess.

all the best from sunny Algarve

Luis, Faro, Portugal
P.S. Do you have 200 photos taken here? I would like to see.


User currently offlinePlaneboy From India, joined May 2005, 199 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (13 years 6 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 922 times:

Hello Ingo,

You are a "lucky dog" !!!! However, I must say you are very good in what you do. You captured a nice photo here. The human eye does not have ZOOM capabilities as do the cameras we all like to use. Had you captured this image from the vantage point it suggests - it would have looked different. I realize I am stating the obvious, maybe I have TOO MUCH TIME on my hands. However, one thing is certain, ZOOM is a true gift that should not be taken for granted - and you have used it well in this instance by capturing the energy of an airliner...


User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 6 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 908 times:

That's a pretty cool photo. It might have been better without the surface heat distortion, but hey, it's a different flavor, and the tire smoke looks good, and the fact that the cockpit area looks good compared to the rest of the plane.

I'm glad Johan accepted it. I would class it as an "artsey" photo.

Charles


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29840 posts, RR: 58
Reply 5, posted (13 years 6 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 881 times:

Actually I like the heat refections on the aircraft.

Good job.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineAndyEastMids From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 1026 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (13 years 6 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 880 times:

Normally, I hate heat haze in a picture as it distracts from the image of the aircraft and makes the aircraft appear soft. However, in this case the heat haze makes the picture - it is different and rather imposing. Obviously, the photo would not have worked without the long-lens view.

Nicely!

Andy


User currently offlineCliffie From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (13 years 6 months 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 865 times:

I think that makes the bottom line, Andy. I thought about uploading this candidate too, cause it shows half of the runway on the lower fuselage, including Rwy number, stripes, wing reflection and some more details (sorry Gary  Wink/being sarcastic), but that just makes not up for the overall (lack of?) quality.

Thank to all,
Ingo


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
LHR Renaissance Hotel Vs. Myrtle Avenue posted Sat Apr 28 2007 03:50:06 by A388
Nikon Vs. Canon. What Should I Get? posted Sun Apr 15 2007 22:16:37 by 797
D80 Vs. 400D posted Thu Jan 11 2007 21:39:17 by Flynavy
Silver VS Black Price Difference posted Wed Jan 10 2007 18:02:30 by Flamedude707
Adobe PSE 5 Vs Corel PSP X Or XI posted Thu Nov 30 2006 05:40:13 by Avsfan
Canon Rebel XTi / 400D Vs. Nikon D80 posted Sat Oct 28 2006 23:03:29 by 9V
Rarity Vs. Quality posted Sun Sep 24 2006 21:11:24 by Domokun
Tamrac Expedition 8 Vs Lowepro Photo Trekker AW II posted Wed Sep 13 2006 11:08:29 by Javibi
REbel XT Vs XTI Plus Lens Question posted Fri Sep 8 2006 07:38:12 by Flamedude707
EF 75-300 Vs EF 75-300 USM posted Tue Aug 1 2006 06:08:47 by NicolasRubio