Newark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 31 Reply 3, posted (8 years 7 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 985 times:
I think it may be the crop that is messing it up. If it was about neatimage, it would have been a badquality, and I think the white poles are behind the aircraft. Sometimes, when these nose shots are submitted, the screeners don't like the fact that too much or too little of the plane is showing. Too bad the screener didn't leave a badpersonal.
No neat image used here and I cropped it so I get just the "West" part. It'd be kind of tough cropping it without the little bit of "J". As for the four poles... I didn't think it would be a problem since they're behind the aircraft like you said above. I'm not here to whine, just looking for opinions, thanks.
Fergulmcc From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, RR: 54 Reply 11, posted (8 years 7 months 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 923 times:
When I looking at a photo you need to ask yourself what do you notice first. To me it was the tail of the plane in the backround and that's taking away from the main subject. The plane should be the main subject and all the clutter in the backround should not distract from the main point. To me that would be the bad motive here.
Psych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3008 posts, RR: 59 Reply 14, posted (8 years 7 months 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 912 times:
Although it is the plane's winglet, I think Fergul may have a point here. On first viewing the position of the winglet is not ideal in my opinion, as it sits a bit 'uncomfortably' above the flightdeck in the current composition.
Though it is being very picky, I wonder whether the overall feel of the photo would have been slightly altered if the plane had turned that little bit more so that the winglet, though still visible, would have been seen further down the fuselage, more behind the flightdeck (if you see what I mean).