A346Dude From Canada, joined Nov 2004, 1328 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (9 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 2827 times:
1. The angle just isn't very flattering, plus the FO is partially covered in shadow.
2. I guess the screeners took issue with that guy standing in front. Also, it is otherwise too dark.
3. Really cool shot, but I think there's just one too many planes in the shot. If that SQ wasn't in the background taking off, I think it might have had a better chance.
Interesting shots, but unfortunately I don't think any of them will be able to get into the db.
[Edited 2005-05-08 18:54:01]
[Edited 2005-05-08 18:55:03]
You know the gear is up and locked when it takes full throttle to taxi to the terminal.
Newark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 28
Reply 3, posted (9 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 2783 times:
I agree with the first too, also, and I think the third one got it because it is not clear exactly what your subject is. Is it the big tail? The plane in the background? The SQ 777 taking off? I think this caused the badmotive. I like the aesthetics of it, but the only thing you can really do is appeal it, and I don't know what its odds would be there.
DLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 2763 times:
To me, the third one just looks looks like a tail sticking up from out of nowhere. Maybe if you'd have not cut off part of the fuselage it'd have a better chance of getting in, otherwise as-is, it's just a tail.