Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Please Read. Baddouble Amended  
User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4146 posts, RR: 63
Posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1179 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi all,
As of today Johan has approved our suggestions for changing the definition of baddouble. Here is (changes are in red) the final result.
====
BADDOUBLE
These photos have already been added to the database or you have
uploaded other photos that look very much like these. Please read more
on this issue in the Upload-FAQ.

Notes:
- You could also get rejection message if there are photos very similar
to these that have passed the first screening and are waiting for the
second, final, screening. Also, generally if you submit a number shots of
an aircraft taken at the same time, only the best 1 or 2 will be selected
and rest may have been rejected as doubles. You can better control
which ones we accept by only uploading the 1 or 2 best shots from a
sequence of photographs of the same aircraft.

- You can also get the rejection message if there are photos in the database very similar to the one(s) rejected here, but taken on another date by you.


Please check the database carefully for already existing photos of this aircraft
taken by you before uploading new photos and refrain from reuploading photos which where rejected with baddouble. Continous reuploading might result in a temporary ban from the site.


AirTeamImages
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 2671 posts, RR: 65
Reply 1, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1148 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Excellent Peter. This is just the kind of developments that I am arguing for.

I also think it is important to draw attention to these issues with posts like this.

A couple of questions

- can a 'section' be created where all these emails/clarifications (I am thinking of your recent badmanipulation thread, threads I have read from Peter V. updating photographers on uploading information, Glenn's recent very useful and detailed explanation of the baddouble rule plus other examples) can be placed together for reference?

- can there be a similar addition to the badcommon rejection email to draw attention to this issue as it applies to that criterion (see my recent thread on this) or does this suggest that now my rejection would have been for baddouble, not badcommon?

Paul

User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4146 posts, RR: 63
Reply 2, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1140 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Psych (Reply 1):
does this suggest that now my rejection would have been for baddouble,

Yes it does


AirTeamImages
User currently offlinePepef From Finland, joined Oct 2002, 440 posts, RR: 22
Reply 3, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1049 times:

Quoting PUnmuth@VIE (Thread starter):
- You can also get the rejection message if there are photos in the database very similar to the one(s) rejected here, but taken on another date by you.

Please check the database carefully for already existing photos of this aircraft

Does this mean you won't reject a cockpit photo of OH-LVK even if I took a similar one a year ago of OH-LVA?

-Pepef-

User currently offlineQ330 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1460 posts, RR: 34
Reply 4, posted (4 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1046 times:

Quoting Pepef (Reply 3):
Does this mean you won't reject a cockpit photo of OH-LVK even if I took a similar one a year ago of OH-LVA?

I assume it only applies to the exact same aircraft. It would be ridiculous if it applied to similar photos of different regos.

-Q


Long live the A330!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Badmotiv Amended - Please Read posted Mon Jul 11 2005 21:03:12 by PUnmuth@VIE
Information About C/n And Code Field! Please Read! posted Wed May 25 2005 08:08:40 by PUnmuth@VIE
Priority Screening, News Banners - Please Read posted Sun Apr 25 2004 16:07:18 by Skymonster
Latest Reuploads Option- Please Read posted Wed Feb 25 2004 02:19:23 by Planeboy
Another Reason To Charge For Photos - Please Read posted Fri Feb 13 2004 20:01:53 by Serge
Final Concorde Dep NYC- Please Read: posted Wed Oct 15 2003 18:37:02 by Joe pries
Photoshop 7 Users Please Read And Obeye posted Fri Oct 4 2002 10:45:29 by PUnmuth@VIE
Rough Edges-Please Read. posted Mon Jun 11 2001 08:02:50 by CYKA
My US 2001 Trip: Please Read. posted Mon Nov 27 2000 01:24:46 by Pearson
Johan Please Read, This Is Not Complaint posted Tue Jun 20 2000 19:23:47 by USAir_757