Andz From South Africa, joined Feb 2004, 8451 posts, RR: 10 Posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3977 times:
I am planning on asking one of the SAA crew to bring me a 350D from New York, probably from B & H. Now, I would like to get an additional zoom as well, and from my experience with my Minolta X-700 something in the line of 70-300 will meet my needs.
However, on the website http://www.bhphoto.com there are so many derivatives of this zoom that I don't know where to start. They have:
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS Image Stabilizer USM $ 1,099.95
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS Image Stabilizer USM $ 1,149.95
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 EF IS Image Stabilizer USM $ 399.95
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 EF IS Image Stabilizer USM $ 414.95
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III $ 149.95
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III $ 159.95
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM $ 174.95
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III USM $ 189.95
For each lens there is an "imported" and "USA" derivative, the USA being the more expensive. This is going to be a purely hobby camera so the first two lenses aren't an option based on the price, but what can anyone advise about the others?
ps anyone wanna buy my X-700?
After Monday and Tuesday even the calendar says WTF...
Sulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2035 posts, RR: 32
Reply 6, posted (9 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 3843 times:
The 70-200 F4 is a great lens, but - dependant on what and where you shoot - you may find the 200mm limiting. Yes you can crop quite heavily, but that's bad practice. For shooting heavies at most airports I think you'd be okay. It's pretty good all the way down to F4, and is nice and stable due to it's weight.
The 75-300 IS seems like a great lens, and you get a good reach plus IS if that's important to you. Look for Paul Markman, Glenn Stewart, Justin Wood (earlier stuff), and Gary Watt for an idea of what it will do.
It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.