F9Widebody From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1604 posts, RR: 9
Reply 1, posted
Fri Jun 17 2005 06:33:36 UTC (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1397 times:
On this computer it looks too jagged (wing) as well as oversharpened, evident by the halo on the bottom of the aircraft. You just shot at a bad time of day. Shoot when the light is not directly above you and you will get much better results.
YES URLS in signature!!!
CallMeCapt From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 496 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted
Fri Jun 17 2005 06:58:12 UTC (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1390 times:
Without struggle, there is no progress. (Frederick Douglass)
Granite From UK - Scotland, joined May 1999, 5613 posts, RR: 62
Reply 3, posted
Fri Jun 17 2005 09:30:23 UTC (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1369 times:
Slight oversharpening resulting in wobblies (rather than jaggies) atop the fuselage.
To me, front half of the aircraft looks over processed compared to the back half.
Nice image and with correct processing, a nice addition to the database.
StealthZ From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5831 posts, RR: 41
Reply 4, posted
Fri Jun 17 2005 09:36:05 UTC (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 1366 times:
Will leave it another couple of days until I get used to these glasses and reprocess
If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
JumboJim747 From Australia, joined Oct 2004, 2465 posts, RR: 41
Reply 5, posted
Fri Jun 17 2005 11:24:08 UTC (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1355 times:
Hey Chris i forgot to comment on your new glasses today when i saw you.
Looking very elegant of late
Hope you are happy with the 2x
On a wing and a prayer