Oneshot From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 8 posts, RR: 0 Posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 1466 times:
I have recently joined here in an attempt to improve my shooting and editing skills. I have found the advice and links to various tutorials very helpful. I have managed to get three shots accepted and would be grateful for feedback on a badquality rejection I recently had.
Newark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 28
Reply 4, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 1434 times:
Perhaps a silly question, but how is the use of Neatimage so noticable?
It gives the image that watercolor-like appearance, almost like it is wet. When you read these threads enough, the neatimage looks just jumps out at you once you open the image. If you post the original, we can give you some tips to improve the quality, since I assume the picture was noisy to begin with, which caused you to use neatimage in the first place.
Oneshot From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 8 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1383 times:
Thanks for the replies and offer to look at the original. Unfortunately I am away all week and haven't got time to find out the originals. Thanks for the pointers anyway and I will re-evaluate my use of neatimage.
CallMeCapt From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 496 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1363 times:
Don't be so quick to dismiss the use of Neat Image. I always say it has it's place in photography. I'm doing a lot of dusk and night photography where I have to crank up the ISO to sometimes 1600 and Neat Image works very well for those.
Without struggle, there is no progress. (Frederick Douglass)