Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Badlevel/badmotiv?  
User currently offlineFiveholer From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1013 posts, RR: 14
Posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1647 times:

Hey all, I caught this rare one at TUL yesterday..didn't get there quick enough to catch it land but it was accesible from the ramp. For some reason, it looks unlevel, but if you look at the wings, its level. I think it looks like that because I may not have been head on as you can start to see the side of the nosegear tire. Also, this was the only shot I was able to get of it since they left a tug and ground power cart in the way. Is it too tight? I think it looks interesting myself, shows some detail.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ready/N941NATUL62805.jpg

Danny


Bring back Bethune!
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLtena From Mexico, joined Jan 2005, 70 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1630 times:

Great photo!!!

Well back on topic, It looks leveled to me  Confused

Regards



Luis Tena Orozco. Why drink and drive when you can smoke and fly
User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2037 posts, RR: 32
Reply 2, posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1577 times:

I like it! Makes me think of the monsters from 'Mars Attacks' for some reason. Hope it's accepted!

Cheers


James



It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlinePsych From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 3052 posts, RR: 58
Reply 3, posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1569 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

That's a great photo Danny.

I really hope that it doesn't have any problems with badlevel, as I can't see any reliable reference you can use, other than what you have done.

Good luck with it - I really like to see the reflections, too.

All the best.

Paul


User currently offlineGary2880 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1563 times:

Great photo, it might get badsize maybe? I had a R44 portrait about that size and it was done for badsize but im not sure

can any screeners say if there's a preferred size across for portrait photos


User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4163 posts, RR: 54
Reply 5, posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1557 times:

About the size reqirements:
Clarification Of Minimum Photo Dimension (by PUnmuth@VIE Apr 20 2005 in Aviation Photography)



-
User currently offlineFergulmcc From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, RR: 53
Reply 6, posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1552 times:

Quoting PUnmuth@VIE (Reply 5):
About the size reqirements:

OK What am I missing here the photo is at a correct size Peter, 683x1024, or do all photos have to be 1024 wide and 683 tall and not the other way around?

Fergul Big grin



Zambian Airways, Where the Eagles fly free!!
User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4163 posts, RR: 54
Reply 7, posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1541 times:

Fergul my answer was aimed at Gary who was asking for preferred sizes. As the text I linked to seems not to be sufficient enough to understand here is some help with some selected sizes.

landscape photos:
The first number is the longer side (the horizontal one  Silly ) * second number is the shorter side (vertical one) in a 3:2 ratio and third (last) number is the shorter (vertical) side in a 4:3 ratio. Note that those number dont include the a.net copyright banner which is added during upload and is 12 pixels high. This would then add 12 pixels to the shorter (vertical) size.
1000 * 667 -> 750
1024 * 683 -> 768
1100 * 733 -> 825
1200 * 800 -> 900
1300 * 866 -> 975
1400 * 933 -> 1050
1500 * 1000 -> 1125
1600 * 1066 -> 1200

portrait photos
The first number is the shorter side (the horizontal one  Silly ) * second number is the longer side (vertical one) in a 3:2 ratio and third (last) number is the longer (vertical) side in a 4:3 ratio. Note that those number dont include the a.net copyright banner which is added during upload and is 12 pixels high. This would then add 12 pixels to the longer (vertical) size.

667 -> 750 *1000
683 -> 768 *1024
733 -> 825 *1100
800 -> 900 *1200
866 -> 975 *1300
933 -> 1050 *1400
1000 -> 1125 *1500
1066 -> 1200 *1600



-
User currently offlineFergulmcc From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, RR: 53
Reply 8, posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1523 times:

Quoting PUnmuth@VIE (Reply 7):
Fergul my answer was aimed at Gary who was asking for preferred sizes

OK Sorry about that Peter, Specsavers comes to mind right now.

Fergul Big grin  sun 



Zambian Airways, Where the Eagles fly free!!
User currently offlineFiveholer From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1013 posts, RR: 14
Reply 9, posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1503 times:

LOL, I'm kinda confused now. So, is my photo at 683x1024 for a portrait ok? Just need some clarification. I usually upload horizontal or vertical shots at 1024x768 or 768x1024. I was thinking of going to 1024x683 now and vice versa.

Danny



Bring back Bethune!
User currently offlineCallMeCapt From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 496 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1502 times:

1024 x 683 is much better as you will cut out a bit more of possible clutter at the bottom of the photo, like fences, etc...


Without struggle, there is no progress. (Frederick Douglass)
User currently offlineFergulmcc From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, RR: 53
Reply 11, posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1497 times:

Quoting Fiveholer (Reply 9):
So, is my photo at 683x1024 for a portrait ok

Yes, I upload at 1024x683 but if there is more I need to show then I go to 1024x768.

Quoting CallMeCapt (Reply 10):
1024 x 683 is much better as you will cut out a bit more of possible clutter at the bottom of the photo, like fences, etc...

Yeah done that too, every little helps when trying to cut out those bloody fences, saves a bad motive! Big grin

Take care

Fergul Big grin  sun 



Zambian Airways, Where the Eagles fly free!!
User currently offlinePUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4163 posts, RR: 54
Reply 12, posted (9 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1499 times:

Quoting Fiveholer (Reply 9):
So, is my photo at 683x1024 for a portrait ok?



Quoting PUnmuth@VIE (Reply 7):
portrait photos...683 -> 768 *1024

And the unclear point is?



yes it is ok
[Edited 2005-06-30 16:04:45]

[Edited 2005-06-30 16:05:30]


-
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
I'd Like To Share A Badmotiv posted Fri Mar 31 2006 11:22:20 by Codeshare
Will This Get Badmotiv? posted Sun Feb 12 2006 20:36:52 by SEAchaz
Is This Badlevel? posted Wed Nov 30 2005 01:30:45 by AirKas1
Badmotiv, Badpersonal, Or Both? posted Sat Nov 12 2005 20:27:45 by Pepef
Beaten By Badmotiv Again: Any Ideas? posted Thu Sep 29 2005 02:54:35 by Philthy
Possible 'badlevel'? posted Mon Sep 19 2005 19:58:11 by DC10Tim
Badmotiv Again - Advice Please! posted Fri Aug 26 2005 12:13:05 by Philthy
Badlevel Rejection - Help Please posted Wed Aug 17 2005 18:50:27 by UA935
Asking For A Badmotiv On This One? posted Mon Aug 15 2005 15:45:06 by Fiveholer
Any Risk Of Badmotiv Or Other Bad...'s? posted Fri Aug 12 2005 01:30:31 by Edoca