Fiveholer From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1009 posts, RR: 12 Posted (7 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1070 times:
Hey all, I caught this rare one at TUL yesterday..didn't get there quick enough to catch it land but it was accesible from the ramp. For some reason, it looks unlevel, but if you look at the wings, its level. I think it looks like that because I may not have been head on as you can start to see the side of the nosegear tire. Also, this was the only shot I was able to get of it since they left a tug and ground power cart in the way. Is it too tight? I think it looks interesting myself, shows some detail.
OK What am I missing here the photo is at a correct size Peter, 683x1024, or do all photos have to be 1024 wide and 683 tall and not the other way around?
PUnmuth@VIE From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4161 posts, RR: 56 Reply 7, posted (7 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 964 times:
Fergul my answer was aimed at Gary who was asking for preferred sizes. As the text I linked to seems not to be sufficient enough to understand here is some help with some selected sizes.
landscape photos:
The first number is the longer side (the horizontal one ) * second number is the shorter side (vertical one) in a 3:2 ratio and third (last) number is the shorter (vertical) side in a 4:3 ratio. Note that those number dont include the a.net copyright banner which is added during upload and is 12 pixels high. This would then add 12 pixels to the shorter (vertical) size.
1000 * 667 -> 750
1024 * 683 -> 768
1100 * 733 -> 825
1200 * 800 -> 900
1300 * 866 -> 975
1400 * 933 -> 1050
1500 * 1000 -> 1125
1600 * 1066 -> 1200
portrait photos
The first number is the shorter side (the horizontal one ) * second number is the longer side (vertical one) in a 3:2 ratio and third (last) number is the longer (vertical) side in a 4:3 ratio. Note that those number dont include the a.net copyright banner which is added during upload and is 12 pixels high. This would then add 12 pixels to the longer (vertical) size.
Fiveholer From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1009 posts, RR: 12 Reply 9, posted (7 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 926 times:
LOL, I'm kinda confused now. So, is my photo at 683x1024 for a portrait ok? Just need some clarification. I usually upload horizontal or vertical shots at 1024x768 or 768x1024. I was thinking of going to 1024x683 now and vice versa.
Fergulmcc From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, RR: 54 Reply 11, posted (7 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 920 times:
Quoting Fiveholer (Reply 9): So, is my photo at 683x1024 for a portrait ok
Yes, I upload at 1024x683 but if there is more I need to show then I go to 1024x768.
Quoting CallMeCapt (Reply 10): 1024 x 683 is much better as you will cut out a bit more of possible clutter at the bottom of the photo, like fences, etc...
Yeah done that too, every little helps when trying to cut out those bloody fences, saves a bad motive!
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1009 posts, 
From Mexico, joined Jan 2005, 70 posts, 
From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2004, 2028 posts, 
From Austria, joined Aug 2000, 4161 posts, 
From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, 
) * second number is the shorter side (vertical one) in a 3:2 ratio and third (last) number is the shorter (vertical) side in a 4:3 ratio. Note that those number dont include the a.net copyright banner which is added during upload and is 12 pixels high. This would then add 12 pixels to the shorter (vertical) size. 
From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 496 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
