Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Sigma 100-300 F/4 With 1.4x Converter?  
User currently offlineLHRsunriser From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 399 posts, RR: 2
Posted (9 years 2 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 5507 times:

Hi all,

I am in a dilemma at present. I have around £350 and I am looking towards a new lens.

The lenses in question are predominantly the Sigma 100-300 F/4 with 1.4x converter. Can I have an opinion of the quality of this lens please on it's own and with the converter if possible.

The other lenses would be the Bigma 50-500 which would set me back more than the others as I would need a new bag and a BG-E1. The cheapest option would be the Sigma 70-200 2.8 with 2x converter, but I guess quality is lost in that.

Opinions please if poss guys and gals thanks all.

(P.S. 100-400 is out of the question lol)


Getting back into it
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineVIR380 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2002, 621 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (9 years 2 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 5486 times:

Quoting LHRsunriser (Thread starter):
Can I have an opinion of the quality of this lens please on it's own and with the converter if possible.

Simple .... buy the lens !

ive used it for a while now , i have no problems in recommending the lens to anyone , rapid focus and pin sharp images

I have the EX 1.4 conv also but have yet to find a use for it yet , although i have played with it on the lens , the focus is a little slower and the F4 becomes F5.6 as for the image quality i ant comment on yet .

hope this helps

Tony


Edit : I also have used the 70-200 f2.8 ... that lens was by far the best i have ever owned ! however the downside was the maximum 200mm , when you have a lower F number on the lens you do not need IS , i would always go with F2.8 or F4 rather than IS personally simple reason of cost and i have NEVER once thought i wish i had IS

[Edited 2005-07-01 17:10:01]

User currently offlineSfilipowicz From Netherlands, joined Jul 2002, 327 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (9 years 2 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 5491 times:

Hi Dominic,

I can't give you any own experience advice on those lenses, but can maybe give you some advice.

I have just bought a 100-400 IS L Canon lens but before I bought it, I looked into some othere lenses. I looked into the combination 200mm 2x converter. After reading several website I decided not to go for the 2x converter as this give a 'poor' result. A lot better was the 1.4x convert but this wasn't enough zoom for me. So I wouldn't go for the Sigma 70-200 with 2x converter option if I was you.

If money isn't a problem, I would go for the Bigma 50-500. Quality is (from what I read) good. The only problem could be the weight of the lens.

Hope this info is of any use!

Good luck in with your choice!

Steven.


User currently offlineLHRsunriser From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 399 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (9 years 2 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 5477 times:

Thanks very much. Well the 100-300 is at the top of the list atm closely followed byt he Bigma. I used the Bigma at the Southend airshow. It was peachy, I could hack the weight but would have to rest the camera down somewhere.

I was just wondering as I will not often shoot full out 500mm, will the 100-300 at 420mm 5.6 give me good image quality with pretty quick focusing. Tony is the focusing real slow?

Cheers Dom



Getting back into it
User currently offlineVIR380 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2002, 621 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 2 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 5473 times:

Dom , The focusing does slow down a touch when used with the 1.4x .... it is still very much useable though

If you bought the lens and used it from the start with the conv on ... youd still be very impressed with the speed of the focus .

still ... go for it

regards Tony


User currently offlineUa935 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 610 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (9 years 2 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 5454 times:

Quoting LHRsunriser (Thread starter):
The other lenses would be the Bigma 50-500 which would set me back more than the others as I would need a new bag and a BG-E1. The cheapest option would be the Sigma 70-200 2.8 with 2x converter, but I guess quality is lost in that

Erm I think you should check your prices out.

The 50-500 is circa £649 the 70-200 F2.8 EX HSM + 2x converter is £818.

The 70-200 + converter is far from the cheapest option.

The 70-200 F2.8 EX HSM is a stunning lens, I own this along with the 1.4 converter and the quality is stunning.

UA935.



Live every second like you mean it
User currently offlineUA935 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 610 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (9 years 2 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 5435 times:

Quoting LHRsunriser (Thread starter):
I am in a dilemma at present. I have around £350 and I am looking towards a new lens.

The lenses in question are predominantly the Sigma 100-300 F/4 with 1.4x converter. Can I have an opinion of the quality of this lens please on it's own and with the converter if possible.

The cheapest I can find the 100 - 300 F4 for is £668.99.

Are you talking about the 100-300 F4.5 - 6.7 which is £89.99? If so I don't think the quality will be great with a 2x convertor.

UA935



Live every second like you mean it
User currently offlineAirplanepics From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2003, 2732 posts, RR: 40
Reply 7, posted (9 years 2 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 5438 times:

Quoting UA935 (Reply 6):
The cheapest I can find the 100 - 300 F4 for is £668.99.

Jesus, is that quote from Jessops or something?!

http://www.7dayshop.com/catalog/prod...=777_4_409_40911&products_id=99500

Simon  Wink



Simon - London-Aviation.com
User currently offlineUA935 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 610 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (9 years 2 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 5418 times:

Quoting Airplanepics (Reply 7):
Jesus, is that quote from Jessops or something?!

No it was from Warehouse express but even £549.00 is still a heck of a lot more than the £350 with convertor mentioned in the initial post!

UA935



Live every second like you mean it
User currently offlineLGW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (9 years 2 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 5398 times:

Dom,

I use the 100-300mm f4 and love it.

The 100-300mm f4 does AF with the 1.4 and will become f5.6 throughout the zoom range. I have yet to try the 100-300mm f4 with a 1.4 although I am tempted to get one but knowing the 100-300 speed I can't belive it would impact much on the speed.

Cheers

Ben

PS Let me know if you do get the combo how the images are and the AF speed Smile


User currently offlineChris78cpr From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2819 posts, RR: 51
Reply 10, posted (9 years 2 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 5378 times:

Quoting Airplanepics (Reply 7):
Jesus, is that quote from Jessops or something?!

http://www.7dayshop.com/catalog/prod...=777_4_409_40911&products_id=99500

Simon

YEs and buying from them isnt damaging the UK market! They also sell grey lenses and to be honest their customer services leave a lot to be desired. Ill steer well clear i think!

Chris



5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
User currently offlineLHRsunriser From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2004, 399 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (9 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 5318 times:

Ok thanks all for the comments. I went Waddington at the weekend:

http://www.ukar.co.uk/board/ikonboar...04da6ef429d7850;act=ST;f=10;t=4418

Photos are in the link above.

Quite simply I will get the 100-300 with the converter which will give me 420mm of reach or I will dish out alot more money for most like the same optical quality if not worse for the Bigma. But it has the extra reach, but 60mm isn't much as I never go wack out on a lens alot of the time.

Ben, I will let you know but since I need another 300 quid if I am going to get the converter aswell lol it will be a while.

Cheers All, Dom



Getting back into it
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Ok Sigma 100-300 EX F/4 I Need To Make My Mind Up! posted Sun Jul 31 2005 13:40:16 by LHRsunriser
70-200 F/4L With 1.4x Converter? posted Sun Apr 18 2004 18:17:41 by Portcolumbus
D60, 100-400 And 1.4x Converter Problem posted Sat Nov 2 2002 15:54:15 by The Red Baron
Sigma 1.4x Converter With Rebel posted Mon Nov 29 2004 06:52:23 by Danny
How Does Sigma 70-300 Compare With Nikkor 70-300? posted Sun Jan 15 2006 14:26:45 by Aviationfreak
300D With A EF 100-300 1:5.6 posted Tue Feb 1 2005 22:46:31 by Gulfstream
1,4x Converter For Tamron/Sigma posted Wed Aug 11 2004 23:59:22 by Volare
Sigma EX 4,0/100-300 EX If (MINOLTA) posted Wed Mar 26 2003 12:10:39 by Apollo
Sigma 70-300 & Canon 100-300 posted Sun Jun 24 2001 08:48:59 by WillL
Pentax ZX-5N With 28-105 And 100-300 Lenses... posted Sun Mar 25 2001 19:59:16 by USAir_757