FlyingZacko From Germany, joined May 2005, 583 posts, RR: 6 Posted (9 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1896 times:
I promise this one will be my last one for this week. I just wanted to hear your hones opinion about this shot of mine. It's nothing special just a regular 25R approach at FRA. Any comments will be highly appreciated.
Canon 40D + 24-70 f/2.8 L + 70-200 f/4 L + Speedlite 430EX
IL76 From Netherlands, joined Jan 2004, 2238 posts, RR: 48
Reply 8, posted (9 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1852 times:
Especially the nose section is blurry, the tail looks alright. It's either motion blur, or the nose section is simply out of focus. You can tell by the AerLingus.com and Airbus A320 titles. Sharpening it further will only bring out jaggies.
The editing is not bad, but I'm afraid the the original has some problems
(that's a speculation from my side. I -of course- have not seen the original).
AviatorTJ From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1838 posts, RR: 7
Reply 11, posted (9 years 4 months 3 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1789 times:
Sometimes it is due to the relative motion of the airplane. I notice it especially during rotation when a wing moves with the camera along the x-axis and the nose and tail go along the y-axis resulting in a blurred nose. Since the tail is locked on in this case, I'd not say it is motion blur. Leaving this to be a mystery.