Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Alternative Lens For Canon 300 L Is USM F4  
User currently offlineLHRSIMON From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2002, 1343 posts, RR: 23
Posted (9 years 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 8938 times:

Well as a few of you are aware I have had major issues with my Canon 300 L IS USM F/4.0. Now I know this lens SHOULD be the best in its class but to be honest I have had so many problems with my 300 L that im thinking if I get my money back I may try another lens.

So here's the question. For a budget of appx £850-£900 what are the alternatives. It needs to have a range of at least 300-400 mm. I was thinking of the Sigma 100-300 (I think its f4). I would have liked to get the 100-300 f2.8 like Chris Sharps , but that's £1300 odd quid !!! I also thought of maybe the 400 L USM F5.6. Comments anyone.....

I may decide to risk a Canon 300 L IS USM F4.0 again but I just would like some comments on what else is out there from people that have used it .....

Cheers
Simon C

PS : Oh it needs to work on auto focus with a 1.4 extender as well.


Canon 1D Mk III,Canon 20D+17-40 L f4.0,70-200 L IS USM f2.8,400 L USM f5.6,135 mm L f2.0, 50 mm f1.8,1.4 x II extender
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFergulmcc From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, RR: 53
Reply 1, posted (9 years 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 8908 times:

Quoting LHRSIMON (Thread starter):
Oh it needs to work on auto focus with a 1.4 extender as well.

Then I think you can't get a lens smaller than an f4. I think I said that right. In other words what you need for AF with a 1.4 TC on a 10D and a 20D is an f4 or bigger, i.e. f2.8.

Take care

Fergul    

[Edited 2005-07-12 17:55:40]


Zambian Airways, Where the Eagles fly free!!
User currently offlineOD720 From Lebanon, joined Feb 2003, 1924 posts, RR: 33
Reply 2, posted (9 years 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 8892 times:

Quoting LHRSIMON (Thread starter):
I would have liked to get the 100-300 f2.8 like Chris Sharps

That's actually 120-300 mm and I had the chance to try it at a local shop here and is fantastic, a little heavy though.

The Sigma 100-300 F4 is on my wishlist and I hear that it works fine with a 1.4 TC. It sounds good value for money but I haven't tried it and only have read reviews which are mostly positive.


User currently offlineTin67 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 268 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (9 years 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 8889 times:

Hi Simon,

I must admit that I too was considering a change.

I have been disappointed with results from my Canon 300mm f4 IS and was considering the latest DG version of the Sigma 300mm f2.8.

I used to have a Sigma 300mm f2.8 EX HSM and optically it was superb, however mine was let down by build quality and I also found the autofocus to be a bit slow with a tendency to hunt.

I contacted Sigma and they assured me that this is a new lens has improved technology so my old issue with AF should be resolved. I think build on mine was unusual, a Friday afternoon lens!

As I mentioned before the results on my old Sigma were amazing. In fact the EOS 10D + Sigma was better than my EOS 1DII + Canon 300. I cannot fault the optics on the Sigma.

If the build and AF are improved the new Sigma 300 f2.8 EX DG promises to be a great lens. Seeing as I can't stretch to the Canon 300 f2.8 it's a definite possibility once I've seen some reviews (hopefully) and had a play.

Regards
Martin


User currently offlineLHRSIMON From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2002, 1343 posts, RR: 23
Reply 4, posted (9 years 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 8889 times:

Anyone know how sharp the Sigma 100-300 is at 300 mm compaired to the Canon 300 L ??????


Canon 1D Mk III,Canon 20D+17-40 L f4.0,70-200 L IS USM f2.8,400 L USM f5.6,135 mm L f2.0, 50 mm f1.8,1.4 x II extender
User currently offlineTin67 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 268 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (9 years 2 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 8880 times:

I forgot to mention.

The Sigma worked with both my Canon extenders.


User currently offlineLHRSIMON From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2002, 1343 posts, RR: 23
Reply 6, posted (9 years 2 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 8841 times:

Hi Martin...

Jeeez you think YOUR 300 L is a problem !!!! Remember when we swapped lenses at LHR and i borrowed your 300 L to compair how poor mine was. Well when i had your lens this photo was the result !!!!!!!! My second most popular photo and imho one of my best.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Simon Curtis



If you think your lens is poor good knows what you would think of my pathetic effort of a 300L. If your Sigma was a Friday afternoon lens, i think mine was an "in the pub Friday at 11.15 pm lens" !!!!!

I am now returning my 300 L to 7Dayshop under their instructions. Im hoping to get my money back. If that happens Martin do you fancy selling your old 300 L if you upgrade to the Sigma. Big grin I know your lens is spot on and it seems imho that 300 L's seem to be either superb or complete guff !!! Let me know if its something you may be interested in doing. Of course this will all depend on if 7dayshop give a full refund !!! As for the Sigma im pretty sure that lens is going to be well out my price range of under £900.00. Any idea what the price is going to be. Maybe 7dayshop will offer a swap if their about the same !!!!  Smile

Cheers
Simon C



Canon 1D Mk III,Canon 20D+17-40 L f4.0,70-200 L IS USM f2.8,400 L USM f5.6,135 mm L f2.0, 50 mm f1.8,1.4 x II extender
User currently offlineMygind66 From Spain, joined May 2004, 1058 posts, RR: 12
Reply 7, posted (9 years 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 8819 times:

Simon..

I really regret you had problems with the 300/4 L lens.
I've bought a second hand one and since that day this lens just has given me happy days and perfect photos. The AF is superb and the optics are not far away to the no reachable 2.8.

Good choice for your next lens  Big grin

Enrique


User currently offlineTin67 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 268 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (9 years 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 8783 times:

Hi Simon,

I can see from the result on your BA 777 that my lens obviously hit the mark in you hands. Maybe I need to get my 1D II checked out ot maybe it's just me! As I get nearer to 40 my steadiness isn't what it used to be  old 

The Sigma is £1699 or there abouts so it's a lot of money and for me to buy one, I'd not only need to sell the EF300 but also my rarely used EF17-40. It's a thought for me at the moment, but I'd need to try the Sigma out before making the change.

Here's a couple of results from my Sigma, the first 2 with a 10D the others with my 1D MkII.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Martin Aves
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Martin Aves




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Martin Aves
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Martin Aves



Cheers
Martin


User currently offlineChris78cpr From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2819 posts, RR: 51
Reply 9, posted (9 years 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 8746 times:

I have the 120-300 and it really is a great lens! I love mine and will use it for a long while, that is until i can afford a 300F2.8LIS.

Simon, go for the 400F5.6L, great lens and different from what you have now. The 70-200 IS and a 1.4x get you a 280mmF4IS which is nearly the same as a 300!

Chris



5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
User currently offlineLHRSIMON From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2002, 1343 posts, RR: 23
Reply 10, posted (9 years 2 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 8712 times:

Quoting Chris78cpr (Reply 9):
Simon, go for the 400F5.6L, great lens and different from what you have now. The 70-200 IS and a 1.4x get you a 280mmF4IS which is nearly the same as a 300!

Yes thats what i though Chris. But i was hoping that with a pinsharp 300 + 1.4 i would get a 420 mm. But still be able to kick down to a straight 300 is need be.... We that was the plan anyway !!!

Does the 400 f5.6 work with the AF. Also whats the 400 + 1.4 like. Again does the AF work with this combo ????

Cheers
 Smile



Canon 1D Mk III,Canon 20D+17-40 L f4.0,70-200 L IS USM f2.8,400 L USM f5.6,135 mm L f2.0, 50 mm f1.8,1.4 x II extender
User currently offlineChris78cpr From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 2819 posts, RR: 51
Reply 11, posted (9 years 2 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 8686 times:

On 20D 400F5.6 will not AF with a 1.4 but will do without.

Quality with 1.4 is good if u can get hang on MF!

Chris



5D2/7D/1D2(soon to be a 1Dx) 17-40L/24-105L/70-200F2.8L/100-400L/24F1.4LII/50F1.2L/85F1.2LII
User currently offlineCX777 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 153 posts, RR: 3
Reply 12, posted (9 years 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 8652 times:

Although I use it for closeup angels...it has worked flawlessly for me over the last year. However IMHO the focus lock-on is slowest of all the "L" lenses I use 28-70/f2.8, 100-400/f5.6 & 70-200/f2.8)

Some of the samples....


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Rajesh Changela
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Rajesh Changela



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Rajesh Changela
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Rajesh Changela



Raj


User currently offlineBell407 From South Africa, joined Dec 2004, 32 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (9 years 1 week 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 8636 times:

Greetings All,

I purchased the Sigma 70-300mm F4 - 5.6 II APO Macro Super lens in April this year and have been pleasantly surprised by its capabilities.

It still takes quite a bit getting used to, but it has given me more options with a step up from my Sigma 55-200mm F4 - 5.6 DC. I still however, hold the 55-200mm lens in high regard.

Cheers,

Marc



"If the wings are moving faster than the fuselage, it's probably a helicopter"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Question For Canon 300/4 Is Users posted Tue Oct 18 2005 17:18:01 by Hisham
300 L Is USM F4.0 Modes/ Urgent Help Please posted Wed Jul 6 2005 00:30:41 by LHRSIMON
Poor Results Canon 300 Mm L Is USM F4.0 Help! posted Mon Feb 21 2005 10:48:42 by LHRSIMON
Anyone Using The Canon 75-300 Is USM Lens? posted Sun Feb 22 2004 12:02:30 by Soren-a
Canon 28-300 Is USM Vs. 100-400 Is USM posted Wed Sep 28 2005 19:16:27 by Stefan
Opinions On Canon 75-300 Is USM posted Tue May 11 2004 15:23:18 by Danny
Canon EOS 30 + EF 75-300 Is USM posted Tue Feb 5 2002 08:19:42 by Ndizani
Canon EOS (30) Elan7E & EF 75-300 F/4.0-5.6 Is USM posted Fri May 4 2001 23:40:22 by N907CL
Quantaray 28-200mm F3.8-5.6 Lens For Canon AF posted Tue Jan 10 2006 04:26:41 by Sokol
A Lens For Canon 350D posted Fri Jun 17 2005 16:12:28 by Ronenec