Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Extender EF 2X II Vs 100-400L  
User currently offlineFlighthelmets From Australia, joined Jul 2005, 2 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4246 times:

Thanks to all those people who have offered advice to me in relation to my new Canon 20D and operation. As previously mentioned I purchased the 20D and Canon EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM for Aviation (Air Show) photography. I'm off to NAS Oceana in Sept from home here in Australia. I want to maximize my opportunity to photograph the "Tomcat" before its withdrawal from service. I found that at the NAS Oceana 2004 show my Nikon 70-200 mm was just a little short on "legs" even given the 1.6 digital factor.

I have also purchased a Canon EF 2 X II Extender with the Canon kit mentioned above. My query is will I lose image quality if I go for the 70-200mm f/2.8 and 2 X Extender over say lashing out and purchasing a EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM. Which of the 2 scenarios will give me the best results given that I will be shooting some very fast military jets.

Thanks in advance to those who are going to offer advice  Smile


Alan Crane
Australia

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFiveholer From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1013 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 4214 times:

I do believe if you are going to get the 2x extender, I would stick to the 70-200 2.8. It's sharper, faster and you lose AF on the 100-400 with any TC on it I believe. It might lose AF only on certain bodies but if I remember, no matter the body, you lose AF on the 100-400 with any TC attached.

Danny



Bring back Bethune!
User currently offlineJderden777 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 1755 posts, RR: 29
Reply 2, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 4192 times:

Danny:
I don't think he's asking about using the extender with the 100-400, but rather which would be better?...70-200 & 2x OR 100-400. personally, i have the 70-200 with a 1.4x, and i'm likely going to pick up a 2x before oceana. of course, to maintain that L quality with the 2x on the 70-200, you will most likely need to stop it down to f9-11. when i have the 1.4x on i usually shoot in Av at f8. of course with the 20D, you can easily bump the iso up to 200 if you need to maintain a faster shutter speed (which, considering its oceana, you will need a fast shutter speed)

i would stick with the 70-200. that will be the set up i will be using at oceana in 2 months. plus, you will still have the 70-200 2.8 which would probably come in very handy at the night show

see you there!
jd

EDIT: edited to include this link here http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/400v400.shtml

[Edited 2005-07-19 18:37:07]


"my soul is in the sky" - shakespeare
User currently offlineFiveholer From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1013 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (9 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 4183 times:

Ah, duh! I had just woken up when I posted that. Head was still a little cloudy.  Smile

Danny



Bring back Bethune!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Canon EF 2x II Question posted Mon Dec 20 2004 13:07:17 by F70173
Canon 70-200L F/4 Vs. 100-400L: WOW! posted Mon Jun 28 2004 00:42:24 by Scooter
Canon EF 1.4x II Extender Or 2x? posted Fri Mar 26 2004 22:08:26 by Dazed767
Canon 70-200 F2.8 +2x Vs 100-400 posted Wed Nov 30 2005 23:42:06 by Donder10
Canon 20D + 100-400L + 1.4x Extender posted Sun Apr 3 2005 16:23:39 by Javibi
EF 75-300 Vs EF 75-300 USM posted Tue Aug 1 2006 06:08:47 by NicolasRubio
Sigma 50-500 Or Canon 100-400L Is posted Mon Jul 10 2006 07:52:38 by Franzloew
The Canon EF 50mm F/1.8 II Lens posted Fri Apr 21 2006 00:57:36 by Aero145
Canon 28-300 Is USM Vs. 100-400 Is USM posted Wed Sep 28 2005 19:16:27 by Stefan
Canon 100-400L Is Is Toasted posted Fri Aug 19 2005 06:41:41 by N317AS
1DMK3 AF Settings (100-400L) posted Sat Sep 11 2010 12:24:58 by samuel32