Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Sigma Lens 28-300mm Or Nikkor 70-300mm?  
User currently offlineAirline7322 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 107 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 10 months 4 days ago) and read 7830 times:

Hello all. I'm about to receive a paycheck for six hard weeks at my internship. I've had my eye on these two lens to mount on my D70, however I'm unsure which one to buy. Do you have any thoughts, suggestions, or first hand experience with any of these lenses? Are they suitable for aviation photography? Finally, for under $800, what other telephoto lenses would you recommend as well.

"Good ideas must be driven into practice with courageous patience."
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineSulman From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2041 posts, RR: 28
Reply 1, posted (10 years 10 months 4 days ago) and read 7830 times:

If you can stretch to USD900 have a look at the Sigma 100-300 F4 EX IF HSM Said to be an absolutely cracking lens. The other two you mention are alright but you certainly won't regret paying a little more for some really nice glass.

edit: Specifically a lens of this quality will have few vices. It's good throughout the range of focal length, and it's got a nice sturdy build.



[Edited 2005-07-31 20:02:49]

It takes a big man to admit they are wrong, and I am not a big man.
User currently offlineAlberto Riva From United States of America, joined May 2002, 124 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 10 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 7797 times:

I love the Nikkor 70-300. I have a $100 G, which is pretty much the same optics as the $250 ED but without an aperture ring, which is not an issue on the D70. Stopped down to f/8 or 11 it can give more expensive lenses a run for their money.

I would avoid a 28-300 zoom like the plague because a) optical quality with that zoom range is what it is, i.e. not top notch and b) it's not really a wide angle at the wide end because of the 1.5x factor of the D70. You'd effectively have a 42-450 lens and 42mm isn't wide enough, at least for me.

My 2 cents is: get a Nikkor 18-70DX and either 70-300, spend $500, and Bob's your uncle.

If you are bent on getting a good long lens, think about a Nikkor 300/4 -- it's $1,000 new, you can probably find one used for an approachable sum and you've got yourself a 450mm beast on your D70. And you can add teleconverters without much loss of quality.

User currently offlineLanpie From Canada, joined Aug 2000, 297 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 10 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 7792 times:

I bought the Nikkor ED lens 70-300mm. It cost me around $450.00 CAD plus tax.

The lens is giving me very good photos



Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Looking For A New Lens..28-300.. Or What? posted Wed Jun 8 2005 23:01:37 by GRZ-AIR
Canon 28-300mm Lens posted Mon Nov 28 2005 02:06:41 by Brettdespain
Sigma Or Canon 70-200 F2.8? posted Thu Feb 2 2006 18:25:30 by Morvious
How Does Sigma 70-300 Compare With Nikkor 70-300? posted Sun Jan 15 2006 14:26:45 by Aviationfreak
Nikkor 70-300mm For Sale posted Sun Dec 26 2004 19:45:37 by Cancidas
Sigma 28-200 Or Something Else? posted Thu Mar 25 2004 05:05:41 by AIRHEAD711
Canon EF 28-300mm F/3.5-5.6L Is USM And EF 70-300m posted Wed Mar 24 2004 12:24:35 by Joge
28-300 Or 28-80 + 70-300? posted Fri Dec 27 2002 13:58:47 by Amir
Canon L Lens 100-400mm Or Sigma 50-500mm? posted Thu Dec 12 2002 07:05:15 by Tsentsan
Canon EOS-300 Kit: 28-90 & 75-300mm. Good Start? posted Sat Jan 13 2001 14:52:22 by Mon330