NonRevKing From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 7, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 2193 times:
From Johan in the other thread: "We are indeed very restrictive but the decision is mine and this photo is allowed on Airliners.net."
So I guess all the "pressure" your "ISP" was giving you to remove the Hooters photos doesn't matter when the photo is taken by a screener who is blindly loyal to you.
I'll be waiting for your "this is different" excuse. You'd be right, it is. This is actually an example of what you were so appalled by, whereas, the others were not.
Come on Johan, why don't you just come out an say the real reason?
Oh and after you do, don't forget to lock the thread, because you know I'm right! Maybe ban me as well. How about "fly to my country, punch me in the face, and crush my dog with a big rock"
"Airliners.net has always had a open attitude and allowed criticism of all kinds against the site, forum or moderators"
Pilot kaz From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 10, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 2164 times:
Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 8): Much like everything else in life, Anet needs to see naked women once in a while, If you can't deal with that then don't look at the pics.
Well your going to see it if you visit the home page ,
NIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 11, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 2159 times:
Quoting INNflight (Reply 9): Didn't get this threads real point?
Oh I got the point. Another pointless post about the policies of this site not being fair. It's tired and old. Can't you all learn and stop posting this crap? Liked the ass pic tho!
Pilot kaz From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 12, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 2151 times:
Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 11): Oh I got the point. Another pointless post about the policies of this site not being fair. It's tired and old. Can't you all learn and stop posting this crap? Liked the ass pic tho!
Oh I'm sorry, I wasn't under the impression that some of were not allowed an opinion and the right to stand for it either....
NIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 13, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 2126 times:
Quoting Pilot kaz (Reply 12): Oh I'm sorry, I wasn't under the impression that some of were not allowed an opinion and the right to stand for it either....
First of all this this is not a democracy and second if you are going to whine about the way things are done on the site post it in "Site related" This forum is for photogs and enjoying and improving aviation pics. Not crying about a pic of a girls ass that got accepted.
Pilot kaz From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 14, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2118 times:
Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 13): First of all this this is not a democracy and second if you are going to whine about the way things are done on the site post it in "Site related" This forum is for photogs and enjoying and improving aviation pics. Not crying about a pic of a girls ass that got accepted.
I think you have your facts wrong...
I posted in Site related earlier today saying if this is acceptable surely all the pics that were deleted a while back were acceptable.
I would post it in site related. Like I already did..
We will not censor the paitings on aircraft or reject photos of aircraft with color-scheme as rejection reason, no matter how they are painted. It is a HUGE difference compared to the photos I had removed.
I have nothing further to add and I know for a fact that people like NonRevKing won't listen whatever I say. So you just believe whatever you want.
Cheers,
Johan
Working on the site from morning 'till night that's livin' alright (1997-2007)