Johndm1957 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 141 posts, RR: 0 Posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 1839 times:
Just had a couple of rejects for NOA_info
Looks like there's been a major overhaul to the rejection notices. Nice job!
However, I am puzzled that both my rejects were uploaded using 'autocomplete' for all aircraft details, and all I entered manually was the date and place from the dropdown menu. Then selected 'single engine' and 'warbird'
Fergulmcc From Ireland, joined Oct 2004, 1916 posts, RR: 52
Reply 1, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 1820 times:
Not sure John
I have had bad info rejections too when using the auto function. I found out that the info in the DB was wrong. I e-mailed the editiors and they corrected the info in the DB and then I was able to reload. What ever the outcome if the info in the DB is wrong be sure to tell the editors so that they can fix it and it won't catch others out.
Your first shot, have you used Neat Image or smart blur, the stab and tail looks very soft and blury.
TZ From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2003, 1085 posts, RR: 52
Reply 7, posted (10 years 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1747 times:
Quoting Johndm1957 (Thread starter): However, I am puzzled that both my rejects were uploaded using 'autocomplete' for all aircraft details,
I have been correcting all the Spitfires and Hurricanes over the past few months, and almost all of them are standarised now, despite the intentions of some uploaders to create their own entries.
For instance, one of the anomolies in the Auto Complete was created by John himself in August-2004 when he uploaded his shot of G-AWII as "UK - Air Force" instead of the (then) standard "Untitled" or "Untitled (The Shuttleworth Collection)".
By the time you've read this, hopefully I have corrected that too!
TZ Aviation - Aeropuerto de los Banditos Team Images