Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Stiffed By Publishing Company  
User currently offlineGary2880 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1553 times:

Hello.

Regards to this thread http://www.airliners.net/discussions...on_photography/read.main/193594/4/

as it says I sold them my Concorde image, the guy was nice he did say could he have the image soon as the deadline was approaching, so fine I sent the image and in the same email I send the invoice/contact/terms and conditions whatever you want to call it. 27th of last month after sending a email to make sure he had received the file well enough he emailed back giving his thanks and that payment would take another week, fair enough. Emailed him a couple of days ago asking why I had not received payment yet I got an automated email back saying he was out of the office until the start of September and if it was urgent to contact so and so, wasn't that urgent I thought he will get the email when he gets back and it`ll be sorted. I get an email today from seamingly the owner of the company saying that they have decided they don't want to use my photograph anymore. 20+ days after I sent the file when the guy was so desperate to get it in the first place. I wouldn't care if they said they did not want it before they got my photograph, but bit convenient they only decided that after they had received my file.

is anyone else having problems with them?

Am not happy. What's my course of action

Regards

Gary  Angry

14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDendrobatid From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1664 posts, RR: 62
Reply 1, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1524 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting Gary2880 (Thread starter):
What's my course of action

That is dead simple.
If they didn't use it, there is no course of action !
A bit like window shopping, or looking a new camersa over at the shop and deciding not to buy really.

Mick Bajcar


User currently offlineChrisH From Sweden, joined Jul 2004, 1136 posts, RR: 16
Reply 2, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1518 times:

The windowshopping can be done right here on a.net, no need to ask for files and promise payment, you've taken the time to prepare and send the image, i.e labour-costs should be paid.

Doubt they'll agree though! I've had this happen to me too, hate it when it happens!



what seems to be the officer, problem?
User currently offlineTommy Mogren From Sweden, joined Dec 2000, 912 posts, RR: 21
Reply 3, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1512 times:

Gary,

I have never dealt with this company.

In Sweden, there's a rule that if they order an image, and you deliver it.
It doesn't matter if they use it or not, they still have to pay you.
That's from a photographer/newspapers/publishers agreement.

Wish it worked that way in the rest of the world too...


Too bad, keep an eye so it's not in there somewhere anyway...

Tommy Mogren



Flightdeck Action - Cockpit Videos on Blu-ray and DVD - Flights In The Cockpit- You're Invited!
User currently offlineGary2880 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1507 times:

Quoting Dendrobatid (Reply 1):
A bit like window shopping, or looking a new camersa over at the shop and deciding not to buy really.

yeah but you dont take the camera home then phone up the shop telling them you decided not to pay.

point is i gave them my photo along with a contract then after they got it they decide they dont want it. alegidly.

not going to be easy to keep tabs on a german publishing company from aberdeen  Sad


User currently offlineTin67 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 268 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks ago) and read 1451 times:

I too provided a photo to this publisher and have yet to receive payment. It's not usual for payment to take a while to come through, but having seen this thread I've dropped them a little reminder. It'll be interesting to see if the same reply comes from the top man.

I didn't accept their first offer when they requested to use my shot, but after a couple of weeks a message came saying they'd up the fee and wish to use the photograph.

If I receive the same message saying that they did not use the shot, I'll will reply with a statement basically stating that without payment, all previous permissions granted for the reproduction or publication of the image by Delius Producing Berlin are withdrawn.

Lets wait and see what happens

Martin


User currently offlinePhotopilot From Canada, joined Jul 2002, 2720 posts, RR: 18
Reply 6, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1450 times:

Well unfortunately this type of situation does happen, though sometimes they are more upfront about it.

When planning a book/magazine etc., they draw up a rough lay-out and then assemble the elements (text and photos) and start laying the pages out. Sometimes during the editing process stuff has to get cut out of the final product. Such is life.

Sounds like your image simply got cut during one of the editing stages and won't make the final product. Therefore no payment.

The same also holds true when dealing with advertising agencies. I've had an agency want an image so they can prepare a mock-up of an ad campaign for client approval. If the client approves, you're potentially in for a BIG payday, but no client approval and you get nothing. That's the way of life and you simply have to get used to it. Try not to become emotionally involved with the decision process. Think strictly from a business perspective. A whole lot easier on the ulcers that way.

Best of luck on the next deal.

Steve


User currently offlineKaddyuk From Wallis and Futuna, joined Nov 2001, 4126 posts, RR: 26
Reply 7, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1445 times:

Hmm, seems my reccomendations were premature as well, after being promised a payment, i have not recived a cheque yet.

I have invoiced them but not received the cheque or pp payment. I have just called the company and the person i need to speak to is not in.

I'm going to keep calling till i get through.



Whoever said "laughter is the best medicine" never had Gonorrhea
User currently offlineGary2880 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1427 times:

Me no like the look of this.

Yes as I said kaddy I emailed and got an automatic email back saying he was out of the office until September time.

I always send the invoice in the same email as the photograph so it cant 'get lost' or they mystically don't receive it.

Quoting Tin67 (Reply 5):
I'll will reply with a statement basically stating that without payment, all previous permissions granted for the reproduction or publication of the image by Delius Producing Berlin are withdrawn.

thanks for the advice i wasn't sure what to write if push comes to shove.

This is the email, with reference to future aviation books I would have to withdraw the permissions

"Dear Gary,

Thanks for sending us your image. Disappointingly I must tell you that it has not been chosen for "Airline Design" or "Luxury Airline Design", both to be published by teNeues Verlag in October 2005.

As packagers we have taken an interest in books on airplanes and hope to create more titles soon. We will then be happy to contact you again.

Thanks again for your co-operation.
"

maybe they don't know that's not the done thing to acquire the highrez then decide not to use it but if they are a publishing company I highly doubt it.


User currently offlineMikephotos From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2923 posts, RR: 54
Reply 9, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1419 times:

It depends on what was agreed upon when the image was sent. I once had ad agency request usage for a jetblue shot. We settled on a nice price ($950) for a very small placement and I sent them the hi-res image. A week later was told the company they were doing the ad for changed their minds and went another direction. She also said payment will be made as in agreement to the initial contract. A week after that I received the $950 check. It's wonderful dealing with legitimate businesses. Wish they were all like that.

Mike


User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9609 posts, RR: 69
Reply 10, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1402 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Ad agencys are spending their client(s) money, and they usually do so more freely.

User currently offlineMikephotos From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2923 posts, RR: 54
Reply 11, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1391 times:

Quoting Clickhappy (Reply 10):
Ad agencys are spending their client(s) money, and they usually do so more freely.

sure, but the less money they spend = more money in their pockets. either way, they're making a much larger chunk of change then we do..thats for sure.

mike


User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9609 posts, RR: 69
Reply 12, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1385 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

nah, they bid jobs as cost + materials....and they pad each "material" so they make an extra 15%

User currently offlineMikephotos From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2923 posts, RR: 54
Reply 13, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1367 times:

some do some don't. either way $950 is nothing when they're making 50x times that.

mike


User currently offlineSaxdiva From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 2382 posts, RR: 42
Reply 14, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1366 times:

Maybe we just do business differently here, but I'd be wary. I use stock photos all the time, and most of them come from agencies. Any agency will provide a low-res version of an image for use in comps. HOWEVER, to get the hi-res version (or a slide, back in the days when we did our own scans), I pay up front, and I've never seen a contract that promises a refund if we change the layout and don't use it.

Now what I *have* done when a rights-managed photo gets cut is go back to the agency and see if I can negotiate for a future placement. Most of the time, this hasn't been a problem. If it's royalty-free, then I've paid the license and it doesn't matter what I use it for in the future. And I *do* keep this stuff in my files.

So... I think this is my long way of saying I'd be keeping an eye on what comes out of that department. And I don't think I'd be surprised if it pops up in another publication.

Just my $.02,
Leanne


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Perplexed By A Quality Reject posted Sat Dec 2 2006 23:53:32 by San747
Got Asked If I Was Cloning By Screener posted Sun Nov 26 2006 04:07:09 by Eksath
Killed By Reflection? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 05:50:23 by Fiveholer
London Fly-by 11/11. posted Thu Nov 9 2006 20:55:25 by Spencer
Ruined By Surroundings? HW posted Mon Oct 2 2006 04:57:54 by D L X
'By The Tail Into The Hangar'. Motive? posted Wed Sep 27 2006 02:11:09 by Chukcha
New CF Card Not Recognized By Card Reader. posted Sun Sep 3 2006 19:01:04 by Cpn360
Baffled By My Recent NOA_Motiv Rejections! posted Wed Aug 30 2006 21:20:14 by Speedbird2025
Do Not Cheat By Changing The Date On Your Uploads! posted Mon Aug 28 2006 00:58:53 by AndyHunt
Possible Photo Theft By Volga-Dnepr posted Sat Aug 26 2006 20:18:24 by Futterman